Talk:Wong Kiew Kit

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Wong Kiew Kit article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
	This article is supported by the Sports and games work group.

[edit] 'Claims' vs 'is'

Before an edit war starts this can be resolved by citing sources for the claims. Have fact tagged for now if no sources turn up then it's just a claim.

The problem is that Wong Kiew Kit is a notorius fraud and his students will be on here claiming that because he says he is the grandmaster, then any source with his claim establishes it as a "fact." (RookZERO 21:04, 28 March 2007 (UTC))

I agree but if you add the fact tags wait a week then change it, it's a lot harder for some one to argue it should be the other way. If you have a newspaper article or something showing him as a fraud you can use that to cite the other version. it might also be good to add a 'criticisms' section listing why he's a fraud however best to read WP:LIVING 1st to check what you can say, or to phrase it carefully. --Nate 08:35, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Will do. (RookZERO 15:13, 29 March 2007 (UTC))

It is true!!! He is one but not the only one. I know that it is not the right section but What about the supposed Huang Chien-Liang Grandmaster of "Tien Shan Pai". I really think that he is the most biggest fraud in Chinese Martial Arts. Imagine 64th Grandmaster of Tien Shan Pai. People call him now "Grandmaster Liar"

At least the Stub connection on Chinese Spiritual writer is delinked.202.82.204.158 01:26, 16 October 2007 (UTC)