User talk:Wolfrider

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Re: Vonnegut

Don't worry about it, his death struck me as quite a shock too. BTW, I see you haven't gotten one of these yet, so...

Welcome!

Hello, Wolfrider, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!  ˉˉanetode╦╩ 04:26, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Order of Nine Angles

Please check the third party sources at the bottom of the article, e.g. by going to Google Books. The concern you have was dealt with in a previous AfD and Deletion Review - the group itself is notable because it is actually mentioned in third-party sources (some excerpts at google books were brought into the discussion at the drv), which then allows the first-party sources to be bootstrapped in when discussing what they "condone". Though you could just write that off as ONA being "merry pranksters" (um... or, as documented in third-party sources, white supremacist merry pranksters).

"Practice", however, was certainly an inappropriate word without third party sources, and I have deleted it.

This article used to be quite long before Tunnels of Set took the delete button to it before he AfDed the article, but to tell you the truth I've not felt like fixing the article up since it came back. Using their own social darwinist logic, if nobody sympathetic to ONA is interested in this article's continued existence, it may as well be deleted, so I won't contest your prod (though you can feel free to remove it yourself if you want). AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 16:37, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

PS - Actually, I'm taking the afternoon off work, so maybe I should clean up the article a bit and put some sourcing in. Then again, there's other things I wanted to do.... AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 16:44, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

K, I'll try and do a bit. The original article of a year ago was way better than this one, which got edited down heavily. Dunno if I'll contribute much, but I'll try to get it attributed. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 22:33, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
Wow. I've never done a proper article here before, it's pretty easy, eh? This is hilarious - I might be able to write a 30-page article on a radical Satanist group. I've only done a bit so far. I think I'll get back to this over the long weekend, but please take a look, and if you feel it's getting better, I'll leave it to you to remove your "truthiness" tag at the top of the article. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 00:05, 1 June 2007 (UTC)