Talk:Wolverton A.F.C.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject on Football The article on Wolverton A.F.C. is supported by the WikiProject on Football, which is an attempt to improve the quality and coverage of Association football related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page; if you have any questions about the project or the article ratings below, please consult the FAQ.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
This article is supported by the WikiProject on non-League football.
This article is supported by the England task force.
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Buckinghamshire. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.
??? This page has not yet been assigned a rating on the importance scale.
This article is supported by WikiProject England, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to articles relating to England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article associated with this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.

[edit] Wolverton Town F.C.

Hi. The article Wolverton Town F.C. has been prodded as non-notable due to not satisfying the relevant guidelines. It is proposed that the bare essentials of that article be merged with this article, Wolverton A.F.C., as being an amateur club reformed from the now defunct subject of this article, and a redirect set, in order to show the link between the two. Please refer to the talk page for the other article for more information. Thanks. Ref (chew)(do) 23:30, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Done. This article already mentions the new club in arguably sufficient detail if it doesn't meet the notability guidelines, but if any more detail needs to be added it can be retrieved from the old article which has not been deleted but is now a redirect. --kingboyk (talk) 12:15, 29 December 2007 (UTC)