Talk:Wolverine: The End

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	comics Portal This article is in the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! Help with current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project talk page.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. Please explain the rating here.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
More information: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: <!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. --> |B-Class-1=yes/no <!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. --> |B-Class-2=yes/no <!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |B-Class-3=yes/no <!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |B-Class-4=yes/no <!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |B-Class-5=yes/no This article has been marked as requiring an image. Please add one in accordance with guidance. Related task forces (publisher): Marvel Comics work group

This article was nominated for deletion on 8 February 2008. The result of the discussion was keep.

[edit] Canon

Is it possible this was supposed to be canon prior to the events of M-Day? A future that was eliminated because Wolverine learned of his past after the events of House of M?

Also Wolverine has just killed Sabretooth in Wolverine vol. 3 #55 ilovemrdoe 00:02, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Merge

Re-direct I propose a redirect of this page to Alternate versions of Wolverine#Wolverine: The End. This article is simply about an alternative version of Wolverine in the future. There is no reason to have an article describing this series here and also at the Alternative versions of Wolverine page. If we'd rather move the description of this series found at Alternative versions of Wolverine back to here and put a redirect notice at the Alternative versions of Wolverine, that'd be fine too. But I do not see the point of having two places that describe the same series. Faults of both descriptions aside, there just shouldn't be two attempted write-ups of the same series, both of which have problems. Combine the two either here or at the Alternative versions of Wolverine page. --RossF18 (talk) 17:43, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

• I'll oppose for the minute. I think there are one or two possible places other than this for any merge, and at the minute I think it's quite acceptable to keep this article as it is. I think the issues the version at Alternate versions of Wolverine#Wolverine: The End have with our manual of style, plot summary policy and original research policy are better discussed in that article. They should not be re-introduced into this article. Hiding T 11:47, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

• Oppose This topic does warrant its own article, if it focuses on the conception of the series, critical reception, and sales figures (which I know exist). WesleyDodds (talk) 00:19, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Sources

[1] [2] [3] [4] [5]. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) 17:51, 15 February 2008 (UTC)