Talk:Wobulation

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

If this isn't just a front for the Hewlett-Packard puiblicity release posing as an external link, perhaps it's a redirect. --Wetman 04:04, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] entry is not just publicity

I wrote the main body of this entry about a month ago when I was unable to find a reliable entry for wobulation on Wiki or anywhere else really. Some of the information is from the HP website, but most of it is compilated from other articles. I'm a wikipedia rookie so I don't know how to add some of the more helpful features like photos, but I just wanted to have a good basic layout of what wobulation is. The original entry was high up on the google hit list but was inaacurate and worthless so I changed it. And no I'm not a marketing plant, I'm just a tech guy who wanted to add something valuable to the wiki. I tailored the entry to those doing research for a TV purchase since that seemed to be the people wo would be most interested in wobulation. There is a lot of misinformation out there, and the tech is complicated so if anyone can shine a better light on it then I certainly welcome that. But I am watching this page to make sure that it does not become a love/hate fest of competeing display technologies. -- FlashGordon

So what is the difference between wobulation and interlaced video? --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 21:09, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

What would be a typical frequency? Do pixels wobulate in sync? Does it produce similar artifacts as interlacing?

I'd just like to note that as of 25th March 2008, none of the links work. Elvum (talk) 17:16, 25 March 2008 (UTC)