User talk:WJH3664

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

An editor has expressed a concern that this user may be a sock puppet of WJH1992.
Please refer to editing habits and/or contributions; this policy subsection may also be helpful.

Account information: block log – current autoblocks – edits – logs

[edit] February 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Luciano Pavarotti, are considered vandalism and immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Dekisugi (talk) 20:27, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Tanya Branning. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -Trampikey(talk)(contribs) 21:08, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Tanya Branning, you will be blocked from editing. -Trampikey(talk)(contribs) 21:17, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for sockpuppetry. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

anemone│projectors 21:18, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

You got that a bit wrong, all you have to do is type {{unblock|reason}} literally as you see it on this page, only you must replace "reason" with the reason you think you should be unblocked. anemone│projectors 21:33, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "reason Is because yes I am User:WJH1992 and all the other names i.e. User:Babybubler92 etc.. I admit that Yes I know that I should <<NOT>> have done Sockpuppetry but you people nevr gave my an oppurtunity if you could please give me 1 more chance I promise NEVER to edit stuff that I probably should not for e.g. it was me that vandilised Reg Varney and the others I should NOT have done it but I promise from the bottom of my heart that I will never ever do anything like that again I do promise and if I ever do it again you people at Wikipedia BAN ME FOR LIFE my email address is blackdogbridgnorth@yahoo.co.uk if you would like to speak to me yours sincereley and Thank you WJH3664 (talk) 22:40, 21 February 2008 (UTC)"

Decline reason: "Your continued abuse shows quite clearly that you have no intention of abiding by Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Yamla (talk) 22:48, 21 February 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.