From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

(Information gleaned from the RS Talk on a current discussion.) Below is presented a definition of "published" for wikipedians, seperate from the idea of "accessible" and "reliable" which are covered elsewhere. Please note, this definition is the result of prolonged discussion and is not identical with the Wikipedia article on published.

Contents 1 Published 1.1 Definition 1.2 Discussion 1.3 Examples 2 Accessible 2.1 Definition 2.2 Discussion 2.3 Examples

[edit] Published

[edit] Definition

"Information created for distribution, and actually distributed to a public"

[edit] Discussion

• Each of the items listed under examples below, must have been actually distributed to a public. An item that is or was never distributed to a public, is not considered "published" by the wikipedian defintion. Your memory of source information is not published, you must have the source in your physical possession in order to cite the information correctly.

[edit] Examples

• A book distributed to a public;
• A newspaper, magazine, journal, phamplet or flyer distributed to a public;
• A film distributed to theatres or video stores; a radio program including its contents actually broadcast; a television broadcast; a streaming video or audio source on the Internet; a song recording distributed to a public;
• A transcript or recording of a live event, including: plays, television programs, documentaries, court trials, speeches or lectures, demonstrations, panel discussions, or meetings, a song sheet;
• A webpage on the Internet, including public web forums, a billboard or poster;
• A computer program;
• A broadcast email, including email-lists if they are archived and public.

[edit] Accessible

[edit] Definition

"The source is available to the public to review in some manner."

[edit] Discussion

The idea behind requiring a source to be 'accessible', is to allow a third-party, unaffiliated, person to review the source. This goes to the heart of WP:V. A third-party, unaffiliated with the editor, publisher or source of information, must have some possibility of being able to verify that a source exists, and contains the information purported. However the mere fact that an item is no longer availabe at-retail is insufficient to nullify it's "accessible" status. If the item is available online or at a library, it is still "accessible".

[edit] Examples

• An item that is available, in any publicly-accessible library (without fee), is considered "accessible";
• A live event, that was neither recorded nor transcribed is not "accessible";
• A web list or forum must be both public and achived in a public location to be considered "accessible";
• Any item which becomes inaccessible, due to the last known public copy no longer being public, becomes at that point not "accessible";