User talk:Wizzard

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

sk:Diskusia s redaktorom:Wizzard

The infobox must contain correct yearly data, but the lead was correct with stating 1000 to 1946

interrupted several times by periods of anarchy or changes in form of government.

The one year period in 1918 was just a change in the form of government. Squash Racket (talk) 07:13, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Okay, but in 1918, the country was changed the republic, so I think that we should write the life span in two intervals, maybe without

interrupted several times by periods of anarchy or changes in form of government.

and it is also more correct, that is what we want, isn't it? --Wizzard (talk) 07:27, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
Only for a year (or less), so I still think the original version was more correct. The official name of Hungary was Kingdom of Hungary after a temporary change of government. Squash Racket (talk) 09:38, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
It sure is a point of view. Almost all other language versions of Wikipedia claim that the end of the Kingdom was in 1918. Some of them even in 1526 or so. It seems that it is the next problem that Hungary and other countries has the different view. I am sure that English language Wikipedia should also differentiate those 2 countries, before 1918 and after 1919. Maybe we should just a little restructure that sentence. --Wizzard (talk) 09:45, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
That's why other Wikipedias are not accepted, reliable sources. Squash Racket (talk) 09:52, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
Hungarian version either? :) --Wizzard (talk) 09:54, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
Why would the Hungarian version be perfect? Well, we have to look up some reliable sources, but both the Hungarian and the English article have their own sections about the post-Trianon Kingdom of Hungary. That's it for now. Squash Racket (talk) 10:11, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
I just think that the Hungarian version should be quite accurate and reflect the Hungarian point of view. Well, I tried to search for the sources on the net yesterday, and everywhere I found the date 1000(1001)-1918 or 1000(1001)-1918 and 1919-1946, no source with the narrow dates 1000-1946 or 1001-1946. So I think that present version of quite accurate. --Wizzard (talk) 10:17, 11 April 2008 (UTC)