Talk:Witchaven
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | |
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the assessment scale. | |
|
VG To-do:
|
||
[edit] Artwork
I notice the boxart is stolen from MobyGames. Can anyone obtain a copyright-free image? Cpc464 12:20, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
- "Stolen"? The picture is added to wiki as "Fair Use" and MobyGames is credited as the source of the picture. Is there any particular reason I'm not aware of that is against the use of pictures from MobyGames? Besides, I don't think there are any copyright-free cover art pictures for the game: the copyright would always be owned by the game publisher/creator/etc... Berserker79 14:46, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Old article deletion discussion
from VfD:
non-notable, there are hundreds of first-person-rpg-shooter-games. nothing makes this one special. requesting removal. --Timecop 23:47, 3 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Delete GaryNigel 00:00, 4 Oct 2004 (UTC)
GNAA trolling all the way around -- the creator of the article and the lister here. Keep the article. RickK 00:14, Oct 4, 2004 (UTC)
I say keep. WhisperToMe 06:49, 4 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Weak keep. — Gwalla | Talk 18:14, 4 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Not notable. We are not Freshmeat. --Improv 21:52, 4 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. -Sean Curtin 23:35, Oct 4, 2004 (UTC)
- Keep valid topic. Passes the "Would an unabridged encyclopedia on X topic include this?" question if the "X" is for "video games." [[User:Davodd|DAVODD «TALK»]] 00:05, Oct 5, 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. I wanted to know what Witchaven was! This page helped! -TOGoS
- Keep. Computer games are a valid topic. Just don't allow any fan-cruft substubs proliferate from this. jni 09:22, 5 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Keep, I see no reason at all for deletion —siroχo 05:57, Oct 6, 2004 (UTC)
- Keep although it needs serious editing and wikification. BTW, shouldn't it be spelled Witchhaven? [[User:MacGyverMagic|Mgm|(talk)]] 08:30, Oct 6, 2004 (UTC)
- Keep Perfectly valid article.--Tomheaton 12:40, 6 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Keep Someone does need to keep track of it. Jsut make sure it's under the proper list --Asmodai 10:50, Oct 7, 2004 (UTC)
- Keep, but clean up some. —tregoweth 17:40, Oct 7, 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. Nothing wrong with having articles about games. Factitious 06:19, Oct 8, 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. Intrigue 18:13, 8 Oct 2004 (UTC)
end moved discussion
