From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
In my defense, I would like to say that I have not used any other account to make edits for months. This page (an old check user) shows I used to use the Wikilama account as well, but I stopped that completely months ago. I am not any other user and the check user on that page does not show that I am. It says it is likely that I am the other users, but this is incorrect. I hope a Wiki admin will run a recent check user on me and all these other identities to see that I am not them. Thank you. Wisdombuddha (talk) 19:11, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.
Request reason: " I have not used the Wikilama account for months. I stopped after I learned about sockpuppeting. [1]This page says that is is likely I am the other users, but a check user was never run that says I am. If you run a check user on me and all of these (Geoffduggan, Helen37, Helen38, Trudy21, Wikilama, Wisdomsword) you will see that I am not any of them. Please run the check user for fairness. Thank you Wisdombuddha (talk) 14:20, 13 June 2008 (UTC) "
Decline reason: "Unfortunately, a checkuser was run at Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Wisdombuddha, and the findings confirmed that the accounts were sockpuppets. UltraExactZZ Claims ~ Evidence 15:09, 13 June 2008 (UTC)"
Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.
This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.
Request reason: "
The reason I was given for being blocked is abusing multiple accounts: Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Wisdombuddha; using socks to push POV.
I have only used 1 user account to edit the articles I work on.
Where is the check user on me that shows I use any other account??"
Decline reason: "This checkuser case proves that you used sock puppets abusively, which is prohibited. I see no reasons to believe that there is any kind of mistake. MaxSem(Han shot first!) 20:50, 12 June 2008 (UTC)"
Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.
- Relevant threads/pages include Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Wisdombuddha, Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive140#POV edits from a group of users on Dorje Shugden, and Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive413#Dorje Shugden and other Buddhism articles. – Luna Santin (talk) 20:27, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
- None of these pages listed show that I am using a sock puppet! I was in these lists because I had editing during the editing storms by the user who was sock puppeting (Helen38, Geoffduggan, Wisdomsword and Helen37). This is a mistake. No check user proves this! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Wikipedia_sockpuppets_of_Wisdombuddha
- No, it says "Confirmed that Wisdombuddha and Wikilama (talk · contribs) are the same person", which means that you violated WP:SOCK. Who of you is whose sockpuppet is completely irrelevant. MaxSem(Han shot first!) 18:31, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
