User talk:Wisco
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] My (blank, generic, unimaginative) talk page
[edit] thanks for the OSH pic
thank you for posting that Oshkosh picture! A nice one. --BACbKA 09:26, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks. Despite the typo/filename, I took it last summer. First time I'd ever gone - pretty cool... Wisco 21:09, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Revert
Just in case: this revert was slightly incorrect. In case you are using some tools to automate reversion of vandalism, you may want to check what happens if someone else reverts vandalism just before you do ;-) - Liberatore(T) 20:06, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Evolution
I really don't think "Alternatives to xxxxx" belong in an article (at least in general; perhaps a specific case could be found). I actually think it would more biased, not less, to have it (and incidentally, it was I, not Igilli, who removed the section. Perhaps you'd consider removing it and discussing it on the talk page? — Knowledge Seeker দ 02:54, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
- Never mind; it's already been removed. — Knowledge Seeker দ 02:55, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Copyediting practice
Hi there, as stated in Wikipedia:Manual of Style (trademarks) Wikipedians must use the name instead of the trademark of a product, magazine, or company wherever possible. -- Simonides 05:20, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] List of interesting or unusual place names
Following a deletion review, the page was relisted on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of interesting or unusual place names (2nd nomination). -- User:Docu
[edit] Darla Crane
Your article Darla Crane has appeared in the Dead End Pages list because it is not wikified. Please consult the Wikipedia Guide to Layout for more information on how to write a good, wikified article. I would encourage you to revisit your submissions and {{wikify}} them. Thanks and happy editing! James084 03:51, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia_talk:Censorship
A watered-down version of the proposed policy against censorship is now open for voting. Will you kindly review the policy and make your opinions known? Thank you very much. Loom91 12:23, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:Bondage Parade n8.jpg)
 |
|
Thanks for uploading Image:Bondage Parade n8.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image can be used under a fair use license. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Abu Badali 03:14, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:Bondage Life -74.jpg)
|
|
Thanks for uploading Image:Bondage Life -74.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image can be used under a fair use license. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Abu Badali 03:17, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion notification
A tag has been placed on Sabrina Bliss, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. James086Talk 14:28, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Glamour9.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Glamour9.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk 01:32, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Catalina L'Amour
Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Catalina L'Amour, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 17:15, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Artemis Antone
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Artemis Antone, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Artemis Antone. SilkTork *What's YOUR point? 00:06, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of Artemis Antone
A tag has been placed on Artemis Antone, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Beeblbrox (talk) 21:13, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
