Wireless electronic devices and health

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

For mobile phones, see Mobile phone radiation and health

The World Health Organization has acknowledged that electromagnetic fields (EMFs) are influencing the environment (but not people), and that some people are worried about possible effects.[1] In response to public concern, the World Health Organization established the International EMF Project in 1996 to assess the scientific evidence of possible health effects of EMF in the frequency range from 0 to 300 GHz. They have stated that although extensive research has been conducted into possible health effects of exposure to many parts of the frequency spectrum, all reviews conducted so far have indicated that exposures are below the limits recommended in the ICNIRP (1998) EMF guidelines, covering the full frequency range from 0-300 GHz, and do not produce any known adverse health effect.

International guidelines on exposure levels to microwave frequency EMFs such as ICNIRP limit the power levels of wireless devices and it is uncommon for wireless devices to exceed the guidelines. However, these guidelines only take into account thermal effects, while nonthermal effects are still a subject of controversy[2]. The chairman of the UK Health Protection Agency, Sir William Stewart, has said that evidence of potentially harmful effects of microwave radiation has become more persuasive over the past five years.[3] His report said that while there was a lack of hard information of damage to health, the approach should be precautionary.[4] The HPA, however, disagrees with his assessment. Its official position is that “[T]here is no consistent evidence to date that WiFi and WLANs adversely affect the health of the general population.” And also that “...it is a sensible precautionary approach...to keep the situation under ongoing review...”.[5] Sir William has resisted any calls to further explain his comments.[6]

Contents

[edit] Exposure difference to mobile phones

While users of wireless devices are typically exposed for much longer periods than for mobile phones, the range of wireless devices (and hence their strength) is significantly less. As well, the devices are located significantly farther away from users' heads, resulting in far less exposure overall: The Health Protection Agency claims that if a person spends one year in a Wi-Fi hotspot, they will receive the same dose of radio waves as if they had made a 20-minute call on a mobile phone.[7] Researcher Henry Lai suggested that long-term lower dosages may cause damage similar to short-term higher dosages, based on behavioral studies on rats and other sources. [8]

[edit] Wireless LAN

EMF levels for Wi-Fi devices are lower than mobile phones (the transmission power of a typical wireless access point is around 35 mW, a lot less than 600 mW of cellular networks[citation needed]), and there is less public concern about the possible, suggested, health issues for wireless LAN devices, than there is for mobile phones. Most wireless LAN equipment is designed to work within predefined standards. The wireless access points are also often in close proximity to humans.

There have been more than 30 provocation studies on the effect of low power electromagnetic fields on people who claim electrosensitivity, and none have shown a causal link between EMF and the symptoms reported. It has been suggested[who?] that the symptoms of sufferers are caused by other, more likely, factors, or are the result of stress or psychosomatic illness.

The HPA's position is that “...radio frequency (RF) exposures from WiFi are likely to be lower than those from mobile phones.” It also saw “...no reason why schools and others should not use WiFi equipment.” [5] In October 2007, the HPA launched a new “systematic” study into the effects of wi-fi networks on behalf of the UK government, in order to calm fears that had appeared in the media in a recent period up to that time. The HPA said it expected the results of the research to be “reassuring,” and Professor Pat Troop, chief executive of the agency, said there was “No scientific evidence to date” that wireless networks could have an adverse effect on the health of the general population.[9] Further, Dr Michael Clark, of the HPA, says published research on mobile phones and masts does not add up to an indictment of Wi-Fi:

All the expert reviews done here and abroad indicate that there is unlikely to be a health risk from wireless networks. … When we have conducted measurements in schools, typical exposures from Wi-Fi are around 20 millionths of the international guideline levels of exposure to radiation. As a comparison, a child on a mobile phone receives up to 50 per cent of guideline levels. So a year sitting in a classroom near a wireless network is roughly equivalent to 20 minutes on a mobile. If Wi-Fi should be taken out of schools, then the mobile phone network should be shut down, too—and FM radio and TV, as the strength of their signals is similar to that from Wi-Fi in classrooms.[10]

[edit] Bluetooth

Bluetooth also uses the microwave frequency spectrum in the range of 2.4 GHz to 2.4835 GHz. The radiated output power of Bluetooth devices varies between 1 and 100 mW, and can operate continuously or sporadically (on demand), so total exposure to EMF radiation is quite variable. Bluetooth devices have not been linked with any health issues.

[edit] Other devices

Radio frequency in the microwave and radio spectrum is used in a number of practical devices for professional and home use, such as:

In addition, electrical and electronic devices of all kinds emit EM fields around their working circuits, generated by oscillating currents. Humans are in daily contact with computers, video display monitors, TV screens, microwave ovens, fluorescent lamps, electric motors of several kinds (such as washing machines, water pumps, etc.) and many others. The typical background power of electromagnetic fields in the home can vary from zero to 5 milliwatts per meter squared.[citation needed] Long-time effects of these electromagnetic fields on human and animal health are still unknown, and most of the studies available have shown no effect. However, the powerful fields produced by radio (and then TV) transmitters have been present for more than 100 years now with no known effects on people's health.

[edit] See also

[edit] References

  1. ^ Electromagnetic fields (EMF). World Health Organization. Retrieved on 2008-01-22. “Electromagnetic fields of all frequencies represent one of the most common and fastest growing environmental influences, about which anxiety and speculation are spreading. All populations are now exposed to varying degrees of EMF, and the levels will continue to increase as technology advances.”
  2. ^ Levitt, B. Blake (1995). Electromagnetic Fields. San Diego: Harcourt Brace & Company, 29-38. 
  3. ^ Health fears lead schools to dismantle wireless networks. Times Newspapers (2006-11-20). Retrieved on 2008-01-22.
  4. ^ Stewart, WDP (2000-04-28), Mobile Phones and Health, Didcot, UK: Independent Expert Group on Mobile Phones, National Radiological Protection Board, ISBN 0859514501, OCLC 48835812, <http://www.iegmp.org.uk/report/text.htm>. Retrieved on 22 January 2008 
  5. ^ a b WiFi Summary. Health Protection Agency. Retrieved on 2008-01-22.
  6. ^ Kewney, Guy (2006-11-25). Mast debaters strike again, ban Wi-Fi in UK schools. The Register. Retrieved on 2008-01-23.
  7. ^ "Wi-fi health fears are 'unproven'", BBC News, BBC, 2007-05-21. Retrieved on 2008-01-22. 
  8. ^ Levitt, B. Blake; + (2001-11-01 +). Cell Towers: Wireless Convenience? or Environmental Hazard?. Safe Goods Publishing, chapter 3. 
  9. ^ Wi-fi health study gets go ahead. BBC (2007-10-12). Retrieved on 2008-01-22.
  10. ^ "Wi-fi: should we be worried?", The Times. Retrieved on 2007-09-16. 

[edit] External links

Languages