User talk:Winterspell

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Home Talk E-mail Watchlist Contribs Sandbox Userboxes Scripts Menu Archivebox Quicklinks Notices

Welcome!

Hello, Winterspell, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!  Regards, Accurizer 11:21, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Wikipedia:WikiProject Kylie Minogue

Hello! I have created a Kylie Minogue WikiProject to help expanded and create articles concerning Minogue. Please feel free to join up. :) -- Underneath-it-All 19:30, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free image (Image:GirlsAloud.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:GirlsAloud.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:50, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use disputed for Image:Shadow Of The Day.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Shadow Of The Day.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 18:28, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:SimpsonsGreenDay.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:SimpsonsGreenDay.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:49, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:SexyNoNoNo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:SexyNoNoNo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:40, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ebttrt.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ebttrt.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:21, 27 October 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:IrresistibleKylie.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:IrresistibleKylie.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:12, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] ITunes Originals - New Order

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of ITunes Originals - New Order, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.discogs.com/release/1085736. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:28, 20 December 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:New Order Originals.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:New Order Originals.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:45, 22 December 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Duran Duran Essential.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Duran Duran Essential.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:18, 13 February 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Duran Duran Essential.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Duran Duran Essential.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it may be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 13:08, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Helpful tip

Regarding your addition of review ratings to various articles: please keep in mind that the stars template should only be used for publications that actually use star ratings. Please see Template:Rating and WP:ALBUM#Professional reviews for more information. Just64helpin (talk) 00:17, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Doctor Who continuity (Partners In Crime)

Hi there. I can't speak for how the other Who articles are treated by their regular caretakers, but in removing the information I was attempting to make the article fall more in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Trivia sections and continuity sections (what others might term fancruft), are generally frowned upon in Wikipedia articles. To my mind, in an article about a film or television programme, the text should focus more on the production, reaction, themes and analysis, and should always have real-world context. While articles in the early stages of development may contain information which does not easily fit elsewhere, this material should either be moved to the relevant section or removed entirely as the article matures. The information added to the article was also original research, as it was based upon editor observation and interpretation, rather than any independent secondary sources. This is also considered a no-no. While other Who articles might indeed contain this stuff, the Partners in Crime article is one which has been nominated for featured status, meaning it should reflect the best that Wikipedia has to offer. Stricter standards must therefore apply. I hope this explanation has been of some use to you, and I hope there are no hard feelings. All the best, Steve T • C 08:11, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Oh, don't take my word for it; I'm nobody :). Feel free to make a compelling case for the inclusion of the information on the article's talk page, with no hard feelings from this end. We can all be civil about this kind of thing and you might even change someone's mind. I'll only add that, where it has been accepted that the continuity sections are perfectly OK, they must still be cited to secondary sources. See Voyage of the Damned (Doctor_Who)#Continuity for an example where every item in the list has an appropriate citation. All the best, Steve T • C 08:25, 14 April 2008 (UTC)