User talk:Winston365

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

All right, but I felt that the Yeti article was basically saying that the yeti was not real. If most of the mainstream scientific community dismisses the yeti as a myth, then we can basically say that the animal does not exist, because those are the experts who are all smarter than us and know the truth. There are still many people who believe in the yeti, and sightings and footprints continue to come in, so the article is being highly dismissive towards the animal's existence, yet there is legitimate evidence, so the article should keep a neutral point of view instead of simply saying "Most people dismiss the yeti as legend." "Most" basically means 95%. Elasmosaurus (talk) 23:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Well currently I have not been paying much attention to the Yeti articloe at the moment. I'm going to let other people edit it and then see how it's going in a few days. Elasmosaurus (talk) 00:22, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] WARNING

No prob Dlohcierekim 04:39, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] June 2008

I see from your profile that you seem to be from the Northern US. As such, you may not be aware of the many uses of gravy. That's fine, but I would suggest you yourself get off your high horse before you undo obviously factual changes. Have you ever had ice cream and gravy? No? Perhaps gravy on duck or goose? I hear the Blue-footed Booby tastes quite similar. In fact, everything I contributed has been eaten with gravy, and I hope you and your northern aggression types can get over yourselves. And for the record, your contributions are retarded.

Yes, we Yankees are well known for our underutilization of gravy. Personally I prefer my blue-footed booby with a nice pesto sauce, but that's just me. :) Winston365 (talk) 20:22, 12 June 2008 (UTC)