User talk:WinCamXP

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Leebo, why was I blocked? I'm not trying to be mean. Could you please unblock me? I do not know why I was blocked. Please!

Hi! have you tried using the {{unblock}} template? You were blocked for disruption, and refactoring other's comments beyond warnings. I hope this helps. :-) Stwalkerster talk 21:43, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Blocked for 3 hours

Due to your disruption, rude comments on my talk page, editing of my comments on your talk page, and ignoring of my warning, you are blocked for 3 hours. Use this time to decide why you registered an account here. If the reason is not to write an online encyclopedia consider what that means. Leebo T/C 21:39, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

Furthermore, please do not refer people to me at the help desk. Many editors review the help desk and can respond to the questions there. What you are doing here borders on trolling. I am happy to help you if you have questions, but I am not a source to be referred to at the helpdesk. If you have constructive additions to make to this project, I am happy to assist. Into The Fray T/C 22:32, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

Hey, Into The Fray, how do I put the hyperlinks in with the little arrow? I want them badly.

[edit] Sorry

I'm sorry, you can delete that comment.

Image:Green_check.pngThanks, I was going to remove it anyway.

[edit]  :-(

unblock|Sorry. I had no idea trolling was bad. I was going to delete the comment on the talk page, too. Sorry.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Sorry. I had no idea trolling was bad. I was going to delete the comment on the talk page, too. Sorry."

Decline reason: "Block was justified, but in any event, has now expired by time. Please make only productive edits to Wikipedia. — Newyorkbrad 00:53, 21 September 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

[edit] Hyperlinks

Your question was already answered verbatim here: [1]. Remember not to edit the comments of others, please and I'd seriously caution you not to blank this talk page any more, because two administrators have told you not to. Thanks. Into The Fray T/C 00:08, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

http://www.yahoo.com/


Thanks, Into The Fray!!!!

[edit] My problem

Image:School.svgBecause of school, I can only get on Wikipedia around 4pm Texas Time.


[edit] Speedy deletion of Pokémon Cheating Encyclopedia

A tag has been placed on Pokémon Cheating Encyclopedia, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD a7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Blair - Speak to me 01:30, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Pokémon Action Replay Encyclopedia

Welcome to Wikipedia. An article you recently created, Pokémon Action Replay Encyclopedia, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new articles, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do and please read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Woodym555 02:18, 22 September 2007 (UTC) (Your question on the help desk has also been answered by the way. Best,) Woodym555 02:18, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia is an encyclopedia...

...not a free webhost where you can post anything you like. Unless you plan on contributing content to the encyclopedia, you should really think about finding another place to play around with your Pokemon stuff, such as Wikia. Further submission of inappropriate content will get you blocked. android79 02:37, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Policies and guidelines

Please give that page and the core policies a read. It seems like you don't understand what Wikipedia is or what is expected of encyclopedia material. If, after reading that, you don't think this is the right place for you, we can help you find a site better suited to your needs. Leebo T/C 04:57, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your recent edits

Hi, there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button Image:Wikisigbutton.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 13:44, 22 September 2007 (UTC)


[edit] About my new Space Encyclopedia

Hello, and I'm making an encyclopedia with facts from 2 science books and pictures from the internet and stuff I know. So go visit SpaceWorld Original Site anytime!

--WinCamXP 13:48, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of SpaceWorld Original Site

A tag has been placed on SpaceWorld Original Site, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD a1.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Melsaran (talk) 14:01, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Space topics

There already are hundreds of articles related to space. Planet, star, solar system, natural satellite, outer space, etc. Find things to add to existing articles, don't create a page for "space facts" as that would have no context within the rest of the encyclopedia. Leebo T/C 14:16, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

Also, in the future, why don't you tell me or someone else who knows Wikipedia policy what you are planning before you spend time creating more pages like this. Leebo T/C 14:20, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
You don't need to "get an encyclopedia running." Wikipedia is the encyclopedia. You're not creating another one, you're simply adding information to the existing encyclopedia. Read that policy page I linked you to. Leebo T/C 17:25, 22 September 2007 (UTC)