User talk:Williamnilly
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Welcome! to Wikipedia!
Hello Williamnilly, this is Exir Kamalabadi, and I hope that you are having fun with Wikipedia. First of all, welcome to Wikipedia! Find something that can be improved, either in content, grammar or formatting, then fix it. Don't be afraid. Be bold! If you do something wrong, there is always someone who will clean up the mess.
Here are some links that you may find helpful:
- How to edit a page
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- Manual of Style
- Community Portal. You can get some work over there.
- The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
- What Wikipedia is not
- Wikiquette, the Wikipedian etiquette
Here are also some tips that you might find useful:
- Sign your posts on talk pages using four tildes
- Create a User page so that others can know you
- Go to the Village Pump or the Help Desk if you need Wikipedia related help, or the Reference Desk for general questions.
Finally, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page when you need help!
Exir KamalabadiJoin Esperanza! 01:30, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] T'rima kasih
Thank you for adding id:Allah Anak to God the Son.
Tuhan memberkati Alastair Haines (talk) 11:02, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Woodstock Opera House
Are you from Woodstock? I was just there recently. It's a pretty nice little town. --LV (Dark Mark) 04:35, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks. Yes, I've lived here all my life. I'm actually in the process of doing a show at the Opera House right now. Williamnilly 05:02, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
- I saw those bird house things and almost bought some raffle tickets. But then I thought about hauling that thing around. The Square when lit is beautiful. Go Marian Central Hurricanes, right? Oh well, cheers. --LV (Dark Mark) 05:08, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] The Office episodes
Hey thanks for doing what you're doing! When creating those articles we should probably be adding a link to List of The Office (U.S. TV series) episodes under the See also heading, right? Just a reminder :) Mrtea (talk) 01:33, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
- Good thinking! Williamnilly 01:34, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
- Just so you know, I moved Diversity Day to Diversity Day (The Office episode) to keep with your pattern. Jfingers88 22:05, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
- Okay, but I was only doing that for episodes that had names that were shared with other entries. I appreciate the help, but at least start a message thread *before* just doing something like that. Williamnilly 22:09, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
- How about your Hot Girl article? Should that be moved too, if just to keep the pattern? Jfingers88 22:27, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
- I suppose, but all the second season articles have already been established, so this should be the last one. Thanks. Williamnilly 22:29, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
- How about your Hot Girl article? Should that be moved too, if just to keep the pattern? Jfingers88 22:27, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
- Okay, but I was only doing that for episodes that had names that were shared with other entries. I appreciate the help, but at least start a message thread *before* just doing something like that. Williamnilly 22:09, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] The Office
Just wanted to drop you a quick note of thanks for all your excellent work on all The Office related pages. Excellent work on adding all that trivia, and all impeccably referenced. Good work! Qutezuce 07:36, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks. I'm working towards maybe one day getting a page featured, hence all that proper citation jazz. :) Williamnilly 19:47, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Edit summaries
Wow, you're really doing a great job with the related office templates and article edits. Just something to keep in mind: Your edit summary usage is 88% for major edits and 7% for minor edits. Based on the last 150 major and 150 minor edits in the article namespace. [1]
Edit summaries let other users easily tell what changes you've made, and let them easily decide if it's worth looking at the article's diff. Obivously none of your edits are malicious, but everyone loves an edit summary. Thanks again for your good work, Mrtea (talk) 21:31, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah, I tend to get sloppy when it's a minor edit and honestly, most of the minor edits (spelling, grammar, adding a capital or a period, etc.) aren't worth a look. But I'll try to remember that everyone's curious at new edits, big or small. Thanks for the kudos! Williamnilly 22:30, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Archiving talk pages
Hi there. I just wanted to let you know that you should archive old discussions rather then just deleting them. Qutezuce 02:32, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
- Sorry. I actually moved most of them to their appropriate pages, mainly Characters from The Office (US). Actually, I don't think I moved any to List of The Office (U.S. TV series) episodes. When I went to put in the FAC notation, I got the message at the top that said the page was getting too long. I didn't realize I could archive the old articles. Again, my apologies. Williamnilly 02:36, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
- No problem. I realized that you probably didn't know about archiving so I left this note for you. Cheers. Qutezuce 02:41, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Danecookretaliation.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Danecookretaliation.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:03, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Chinese restaurant seinfeld.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Chinese restaurant seinfeld.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:48, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] The Office (U.S. TV series) FAR
The Office (U.S. TV series) has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 03:31, 22 February 2008 (UTC)