User talk:Williamc68

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] License tagging for Image:FuManchu1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:FuManchu1.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:05, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] License tagging for Image:N503701224 33711 16.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:N503701224 33711 16.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:09, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Fu Manchu1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Fu Manchu1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 02:08, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Dtrejo345.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Dtrejo345.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:07, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Grindhouse-20070404045805223.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Grindhouse-20070404045805223.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:07, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:43672595ul1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:43672595ul1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 00:05, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Deathproof Plot Description

Hi, I saw you recently erased edits I made to Deathproof. I was wondering why you decided to revert back to incorrect details. I added information that I felt was important to describing the plot and corrected some wrong details. For instance the current plot description includes:

  • Zoë plays a dangerous game which she calls "Ship's Mast", strapped to the front windshield
  • The girls decide to take revenge, chasing him on the country road and crashing into him before violently beating him in the face with a metal pipe.
  • Mike's car flips over, breaking his arm,

If you saw the movie, you'd know these are incorrect because:

  • Zoë is holding onto leather straps, and not strapped in. It is why her falling was a danger.
  • They crashed into a his car while it was standing still, not chasing him. Zoë had stepped out of the car to beat him and drives off.
  • He says that his leg was broken, and not his arm.

In addition, I added important facts that were repeatedly mentioned in the film such as:

  • The importance of the Dodge Challenger being the model from Vanishing Point. Vanishing Point and other car-chase movies are a part of the exploitation film-style that Taratino is employing. It says so in the introductory part of the article.

I can understand editing what I wrote because it wasn't clear, but edit back inaccuracies isn't productive. If you feel the details I added were wrong and inaccurate, please let me know and explain. If you feel that there it is too much information, please talk about it in the current discussion regarding that rather than just removing the edit without even an edit description. I'd appreciate that! Also removing that much out of the body of an edit isn't "minor". Thanks! --SquatGoblin 19:49, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Replaceable fair use Image:N503701224_33711_16.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:N503701224_33711_16.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk 02:05, 14 July 2007 (UTC)