User talk:Wilhelmina Will/Archive 2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archive
Archives

First archive (One hundred messages)



Contents

[edit] Delivered message from my userpage:

If you'll permit me to edit your page (I dunno what the rules are there, but delete this anytime), what is good speculation and what is bad, and who decides? If I speculate that Cartman is French, for example, why shouldn't my speculation go in the article? Where does it stop? It would be chaos. It's basically original research. That's why we have to base things on reliable sources, not on our own opinions. Hopefully a newspaper or DVD commentary will note as you have that Kevin and Esther may be twins, then it can go in wikipedia. 86.44.6.14 (talk) 02:22, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
It is the encylopedia that matters. And I think over time people have noticed that the encylopedia works best when people focus on the content submitted, not on the editor submitting it. :) You're completely right about how people shouldn't remove personal attacks from your talk page, btw (and wikipedia policy agrees: wp:rpa), even if they're probably just trying to be nice. 86.44.6.14 (talk) 02:22, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] re: Happy Valentine's Day!

Thanks, hope you have a great day too! --Farosdaughter (talk) 02:39, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Hello, Wilhelmina Will. You have new messages at jazzeur's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} template.

Thanks! Have a great day yourself! - Rjd0060 (talk) 03:54, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks! The Chronic 06:02, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
Yup, thanks! ;) --LAX 09:49, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
Lol, thanks, same to you. :)  Paul  730 14:05, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
This is a little late, but I'd just like to add my thanks for the cute Valentine too. :) Keep smiling! - Sestet (talk) 21:08, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks

It did lighten up my day! I hope you're having a good one too! seresin | wasn't he just...? 03:59, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] RE: Valentines

Thanks for the pic, Will! I appreciate your thoughtful gesture. Bluecatcinema (talk) 12:05, 14 February 2008 (UTC)


Well, surprisingly, it did make my day! :D - Mtmelendez (Talk) 15:07, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks!

also for the image. Happy day to you too. -- Myke Cuthbert (talk) 19:44, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

What all the others said. Thanks a lot! 96T (talk) 21:05, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] My second attack, received (Lucky me!!!)=

YOU AINT GNA GET NO PuSSY IF YOU@RE ON FUCKIN WIKIPEDIA ALL DAY GAYLORD - IM GOING TO OXFORD NOW YEAHHHHHHHHHHH IM THE BEST (The preceding unsigned comment was added by User:81.109.22.41 (Talk) at 23:49, 14 February, 2008.)

[edit] ...

Here's a Valentine's Day Kiss on the cheek for you, Madam
Here's a Valentine's Day Kiss on the cheek for you, Madam

Thanks! I always wanted a Wiki-Valentine ;u) Anyhow, I hope your <3's Day went swell, too. --Is this fact...? 06:02, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Your recent edit at User talk:Negropoppa

Was this directed at me or at User:Negropoppa? Just wondering, Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 21:13, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Well, then that settles that. Thanks for the clarification. One thing I'll add though, as a perfectly non-prejudicial, non-"anti-religious" editor, is be careful not to let your mind open to far. Open mindedness is a good thing, and far less stressful than closemindedness. However, if you let your mind open too far, it is possible that your brain could fall out. Cheers! Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 22:39, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] WIGGIN/TATE

Judy Tate is an American television writer and playwright. She has written for ATWT (Breakdown Writer: 2000-March 26, 2007; Script Writer: March 27, 2007 - October 15, 2007) and Days of Our Lives (Breakdown Writer: November 12, 2007 - January 2008). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.69.105.145 (talk) 04:56, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Maria Arena Bell

[edit] Rothenberg

[edit] D.M. Stanley

[edit] ADER

[edit] == Why would a discussion allow unofficial material? ==

This is not my decision to have this in the intro either. If you look at the discussion page the consensus was to leave it as is.
I also don't see what you mean by 'official', is the ft not a good enough reference?FFMG (talk) 20:04, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Randy Robbins/Frank Pacelli

[edit] 5 Writers

Please help us out. Thanks.

Patti Dizanzo is an American television writer who worked on Guiding Light (1978-1984) and As The World Turns (1984-1996).

Meredith Post is an American television writer who wrote for ATWT (1983-1997) and DOOL (1997-2001). She received 6 Daytime Emmy nominations and a single WGA Award nod.

[edit] Shelly Moore

[edit] CORLEY

[edit] Parker/Burdette

[edit] BRAXTON/PINSKER

[edit] KUNTZ

[edit] Klein

Kathleen Klein is an American television writer who has worked on All My Children (1986-1993, 1995-2001), Another World (1993-1994), and Guiding Light (1994-1995). She has been nominated for 10 Daytime Emmys and 5 WGA Awards. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.69.105.145 (talk) 00:47, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] JACK WOOD

[edit] Wells

[edit] Kirshenbaum

Susan Kirshenbaum is an American television writer who worked on All My Children (1983-1994) and As The World Turns (1995-2000). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.69.105.145 (talk) 01:47, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Adolph

No, my name is not Adolph. Thanks for asking, Gwernol 06:15, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] BcBot

Good heavens! How unusual, and what a pleasant surprise. Somebody posted something polite, pleasant and (wait for it) helpful & useful on a BcBot-related page!!
That deserves a Barnstar!!! What can I find? I know, I can do better than a Barnstar. Here's one of Phaedriel's flowers.

Thank you!


Pdfpdf (talk) 09:27, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Hey you!

google sez ur special so i luv u lulz —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.136.156.3 (talk) 08:00, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Thx

just wanted to say thax for the nice sex 15 minutes ago ciao 69.136.156.3 (talk) 09:38, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Ancestry boxes

Hello Wilhelmina Will! I see that you say you don't know how to put in the boxes for your Dutch, Danish, Prussian, Russian and Portuguese ancestry. Here they are, except for Prussian:

This user is of Dutch ancestry.
This user is of Danish ancestry.
This user is of Russian ancestry.
This user is of Portuguese ancestry.

Cheers! The Ogre (talk) 23:55, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Found the Prussian one!
This user is of Prussian ancestry.
Bye! The Ogre (talk) 23:58, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] IP block

Hi WWill,

We don't do permanent blocks of anonymous IP accounts, because it is possible that they could be in use by more than one user. We can, however, give longer and longer blocks if the IP continues vandalizing -- I've seen them up to 6 months. Thanks for your help with this one! NawlinWiki (talk) 04:32, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Nicole Burdette

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Nicole Burdette, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.newschool.edu/drama_cms/faculty.aspx?id=9392. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 00:50, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] RE: Challenge

Responding to your challenge. There are many pgs in the soap opera categories and WP:AFC that need to be created. They are mostly about notable writers/producers/directors/executives. Try: Ron Lagomarsino —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.69.43.206 (talk) 05:32, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] re: Well I like that!

I've replied on my talk page. --Captain Infinity (talk) 18:39, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Why did you delete these images?

The images could be used in separate articles on the DVDs or if there was significant commentary on the DVDs in Dante's Cove but they were just decorative, failing WP:NFCC #8 -Nv8200p talk 04:15, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

No commentary. Grouping into a list would not help. -Nv8200p talk 04:50, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:VeronicaStar.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:VeronicaStar.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:35, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Happy Saint Patrick's Day!

I hope yours is a blessing this year! --Is this fact...? 22:51, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Re:WhatYouSaid

Well, I always try to be kind. :u) Anyhow, Happy Good Friday/Easter, too, and good luck with that sock puppet case. --Is this fact...? 22:02, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:BabyPoof.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:BabyPoof.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Polly (Parrot) 01:48, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:TimmyTurner.gif

Why are you defending an inferior image of Timmy Turner in the wrong format (GIF, vs. PNG)? According to Wikipedia's fair use policy, we cannot keep duplicate images if one of the images is unused. Also, images on Wikipedia should never be saved as GIF unless animated. On my version, I also removed the interlacing artifacts from the image. ANDROS1337 01:14, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Signpost updated for March 13th and 17th, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery


Volume 4, Issue 11 13 March 2008 About the Signpost
From the editor 
Accusations of financial impropriety receive more coverage Best of WikiWorld: "Five-second rule" 
News and notes: New bureaucrat, Wikimania bids narrowed, milestones Wikipedia in the News 
Dispatches: Vintage image restoration WikiProject Report: Professional wrestling 
Tutorial: Summary of policies Features and admins 
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation 
Volume 4, Issue 12 17 March 2008 About the Signpost
Best of WikiWorld: "The Rutles" News and notes: Single-user login, election commission, milestones 
Wikipedia in the News Dispatches: Changes at peer review 
WikiProject Report: Tropical cyclones Tutorial: Editing Monobook, installing scripts 
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 
The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 02:43, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] RE: APK's talk page

Look, he can't be forced to listen to you. He has acknowledged your point, and continues to disagree with you. If you proceed in belaboring the point, you are going to be blocked for harassment and disruption. You are taking what was a small issue that did not concern you, and turning it into a bigger problem for yourself which may get you sanctioned. No one wants this, so please stop... --Jayron32.talk.contribs 04:17, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

For real... let it drop. All of it... Just forget it ever happened, make no further contact with APK, and make no further attempt to make comments ABOUT APK... This all goes away when you stop... --Jayron32.talk.contribs 04:27, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
I try. In the future, please try to de-escalate problems rather than escalate them. Getting to the point were admins are involved is always a bad course of action. Sometimes, the best thing to do is to be the "bigger person" and just walk away. Lets consider the whole matter closed. --Jayron32.talk.contribs 04:33, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Attack page deleted

You may not maintain a subpage that is a list of Wiki-enemies, and I have deleted the page as such. Please read WP:ATP, especially the line that reads: a "list of enemies" or "list of everything bad that some user ever did" is not constructive or appropriate. . Please stop this. --Jayron32.talk.contribs 04:24, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

And I've redeleted it as Users I don't see eye to eye with. Let the matter go. Theresa Knott | The otter sank 08:36, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Notification

[edit] Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Wilhelmina Will for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. AgnosticPreachersKid (talk) 07:16, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Land Before Time Wiki

Hello! I am Aabicus on the Land Before Time Wiki. Thank you for all the work you've done cleaning up and improving the wiki! Would you like to be made an admin over there?--Ye Olde Luke (talk) 17:04, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] News from Grieferhate

I noticed that u seem 2 be a South Park fan. I'm looking 4 da episode in which Stan loses his virginity, because I wud rather be the "person dumb enough to look deserving to lose that much of their life." (Quoting Matt Stone's statement in the interview). I couldn't stand the idea of any other fan, especially u, looking dumb and deserving 2 lose as much of their life as Stan did. I don't think that it would be a very flattering mark, and I'm perfectly willing to save people that embarrassment and find them the episode. Do u think I'm doing da right thing or shud I let someone else find it? Thanks for the kindness you've shown me and your support in helping me with my slightly strong "campaign" to stop Kyle Broflovski's age being changed to 8, by da way! U have been a gud wikipedia friend! Grieferhate (talk) 23:10, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Sorry About That

No doubt you will see that I apparently reverted you and then undid my revert. My apologies that happened. I was going through television articles, saw you, checked your contribs, whereupon I accidentally clicked the rollback. Sorry once again, just wanted to let you know there's no problem: just a stupid twitch of my thumb. :P Happy editing! -WarthogDemon 01:36, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Weird messages from User:72.200.177.49

Of which he/she replaced my entire page content here with these notes:

Colective. What Can You Lose? preceding unsigned comment added by User:72.200.177.49, at 01:20, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Colective. "What Can You Lose?" It's a message to treelo, elaich and dietlimecola.Bitch. preceding unsigned comment added by User:72.200.177.49, at 17:03, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

Because you are obviouslly his girlfriend. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.200.177.49 (talk) 20:01, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Signpost updated for March 24th, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery


Volume 4, Issue 13 24 March 2008 About the Signpost
Single User Login enabled for administrators Best of WikiWorld: "Clabbers" 
News and notes: $3,000,000 grant, milestones Wikipedia in the News 
Dispatches: Banner shells tame talk page clutter WikiProject Report: Video games 
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 
The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:33, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] User talk:Wilhelmina Will/Is Keira Knightley an Ichthyosaur?

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article User talk:Wilhelmina Will/Is Keira Knightley an Ichthyosaur?, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of User talk:Wilhelmina Will/Is Keira Knightley an Ichthyosaur?. Black Falcon (Talk) 17:34, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] More news from Grieferhate

Oh, hey. Hope ur well. Still looking for that mystery episode. Hoping I can look for it without losing my sanity. Progress is slow and arduous and I'm tiring, but still going strong. U cul? 86.162.29.210 (talk) 23:51, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Sockpuppet

Wow. You really are a sockpuppet. When someone accuses you of sockpuppetry, you went all out on them. Also, don't expect God to zap everyone that pisses you off. That doesn't make you religious. If your having such a hard time on Wikipedia, then get off and get a life. dumbass.72.200.177.49 (talk) 20:06, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Weird messages from User:Colective Fighter Jason

Whom I personally believe may be associated with that other strange user (who is an IP) from further up.

Colective owns this page preceding unsigned comment added by User:Colective Fighter Jason, at 22:50, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Signpost updated for March 31st, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery


Volume 4, Issue 14 31 March 2008 About the Signpost
Wikimania 2009 to be held in Buenos Aires Sister Projects Interview: Wikisource 
WikiWorld: "Hammerspace" News and notes: 10M articles, $500k donation, milestones 
Dispatches: Featured content overview WikiProject Report: Australia 
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 
The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 22:24, 2 April 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Cosmo and Wanda.PNG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Cosmo and Wanda.PNG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 02:30, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:BabyPoof.jpg

Stop removing tags that still apply. --Geniac (talk) 04:26, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

"It'll get deleted if it's not a redirect." - Yes, that's the point. A better version is now available and so this version of the same image needs to be deleted. If you continue being disruptive in this way, or any other, you will be blocked. You should also know that comments like "Have mercy, damn it! Mercy!!!" and "For shame!" sound childish and are not constructive. You need to give actual, valid reasons for things and use appropriate edit summaries that reflect the edit being made. --Geniac (talk) 20:10, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for disruption. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Geniac (talk) 04:31, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

{{unblock|I have work to do elsewhere in Wikipedia, and I cannot get it done with this delay. Furthermore, I have not caused disruption. After your final message to me, Geniac, did I revert you again? No, I did not. I merely attempted to close the discussion by saying why I did what I did, as I do with every discussion. I do not like images being deleted when they could be redirected instead. I do not like anything being deleted when it could be redirected instead. In proposed deletions of articles, the first thing I ever suggest is merely redirecting them. If those with the proper authority choose not to follow this advice, that's their business, not mine. Now I am off, thinking that this whole issue is over, gathering references for an article I am trying to improve, and I come back and find this has happened. Undo this act, please. To add to what I have to say: I'm sorry if I upset you in all this, Geniac, I truly am. But you must understand that I am quick-tempered, and I often lash out before I can stop myself. You might be amazed at how much worse my reaction would have been in January. And it took this sort of house arrest to make me realise where I was going wrong. Even now I've not got a perfect savoir faire, but I'm trying to stay on the road to it. But I should have been calmer, and explained myself more clearly and gently, I know. Especially when you and I have discussed things with each other two or three times before, and actually seemed to get along pretty well. I just don't understand why you won't leave the JPG images as redirects to the PNG images, or why you seem to show no emotion towards them. I hate it when people seem stone cold towards something I am passionate about; especially when I've previously known them to be very nice people, and excellent Wikipedians.}}

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

You appear to have learned that you should ask questions instead of being disruptive by repeatedly reverting with inappropriate edit summaries.

Request handled by: Geniac (talk) 14:44, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Actually, you have not yet unblocked me, Geniac, or there was a malfunction somewhere. I still cannot edit pages. But thank you very much, anyway! Wilhelmina Will (talk) 02:00, 7 April 2008 (UTC) Nevermind, I am back now. Wilhelmina Will (talk) 02:28, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Weird messages received from User:72.200.176.36

This one here has got to be, by far, the strangest of these messages yet. But I'll betcha ten to one that it's connected to that previous IP user and that account user before... Anyway, I have removed a lot of the spacing so as not to bloat out the talk page too much.

U r startin to piss me off. The Colectives wont stop vandalizing. We can vandalize anywhere and anytime. If you protect your page, we will wait until you un-protect it. You will half to. Fucker.

Colective own this page and this user

Colective.

Colective

Colective.preceding unsigned comment added by User:72.200.176.36, at 21:57, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free image (Image:TimmyTurner.gif)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:TimmyTurner.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- lucasbfr talk 14:29, 6 April 2008 (UTC)


[edit] that's a wierd question

Well comparing to my american friends I'd say it's the same really. Matthieu (talk) 13:40, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

If you say that to a Frenchman he's going to think you love him, I doubt it is the purpose here is it? If you want to show how much you like the French language it's better to say "J'adore la langue française" or something like that so you can avoid ambiguities. Don't hesitate if you have other questions. Matthieu (talk) 20:50, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
The very few (I can think of only one time) I used another wikipedia article as a source (to back something I knew and I had other sources on the topic, just wanted to diversify the sources) I didn't quote the other article but re-used the academic source is used, in this precise case it was Duffy's Mediaval Ireland (I was tired of using Gillingham, Hallam, Aurel and Carpenter as contant sources). In all case, it won't give a lot of weight to the point if you just quote another wiki article, use a recognised source rather (can't say wiki is one) Matthieu (talk) 17:45, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
alright, here you go, it's not a litteral translation but is largely acceptable: "Quel est la meilleure façon de faire? Citer une source via un article ou se contenter de la laisser comme un lien en bas de page?" Matthieu (talk) 13:09, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia articles as a source

Where did you read that other Wikipedia articles can be cited in an article? "[...] open wikis [...] are largely not acceptable." (WP:SPS) and Wikipedia is not a "third-party published source with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy" (WP:SOURCES). You said, "in Chris Griffin's article, there was a statement, which another user removed, asking that they (who put it in) please cite the episode in which it occured". Yes, an episode can be cited, but not an episode's article. --Geniac (talk) 12:51, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Yes, when an episode is cited, a link to that episode's article would be appropriate. The refs I removed from Randy and Sharon Marsh didn't make it obvious what was being cited; the article or the episode. Using {{cite web}} or {{cite episode}} would make it clearer. BTW, no; see WP:NFCC#1. --Geniac (talk) 04:16, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] I must repaint my house

Correct translation would be: "Je dois repeindre ma maison". Cheers. Matthieu (talk) 08:21, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] HolywoodChicago.com

I see that you rejected the new article creation for HollywoodChicago.com. How does it not have reliable sources? It has a huge list of reliable sources.

[edit] Second attempt at article for HollywoodChicago.com

Per your guidance, I have created a new article. Is this new article better?

Probably the best place to further explain to the author (it took me a second to realize this was via the Articles for Creation process) why that article had problems... I went through those sources... none of them are about HollywoodChicago.com - they are stories about other things that link to stories about those things that happen to be published by HollywoodChicago.com - I am glad the site is seeing success in syndicating its content... but again, no one is talking about the site itself... only Batman and film screening. (And Wilhelmina Will, thanks for taking care of it.)--Marcinjeske (talk) 09:31, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
On my talk page it said the article is live, but I just checked and the new article for HollywoodChicago.com is all gone and only appears to redirect to the Chicago Film Critics Association. Why is it a redirect and why is the whole article gone? Are you looking for stories that instead write about the publication (like this and this?) --68.72.135.94 (talk) 20:42, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
Wilhelmina Will said in edit summary: You were all for redirecting on the other user's talk page.

No, I was not all for redirecting on User_talk:68.72.135.94. I said there were three paths which could be taken, one of them being keeping the redirect that you created as a way to wait until things cool over. The one I preferred was restoring the article and leaving it Proposed for deletion so that the opinion of another editor would be solicited. However, given that it was obvious that the HC.com people objected to deletion and I presume you object to deletion, I had to follow my third option, which was to bring the article up for a discussion... in going through the prescribed process, the Wikipedia software informed me that this exact article had already been discussed a few month ago, and deleted with overwhelming consensus. the relevant discussions are:

He has been wasting all of our time and the time of editors before us... by repeatedly submitting the same promotional content. I read the third party article cited, I listened to the whole darn radio interview... there is nothing there except to substantiate that HC.com exists. What he says in an interview are his own words... you cannot be a third-party source for yourself. I hope you understand I am not drawing this line because of some spite... but Wikipedia is so awash in self-promotion that every piece we can keep out is vital. --Marcinjeske (talk) 21:32, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

I see that you have removed my speedy deletion and restored the redirect. If I interpret WP:CSD correctly, you are the creator of the page:
Any editor who is not the creator of a page may remove a speedy tag from it.
The creator may not do this. A creator who disagrees with the speedy deletion
should instead add hangon to the page, and explain the rationale on the page's discussion page.
Assuming your redirect was intended to disagrees with my speedy deletion request, I am restoring the page, placing the hangon on your behalf, and copying the substance of discussion from User_talk:68.72.135.94 on the HC.com discussion page. --Marcinjeske (talk) 21:39, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Inga Liepa and reliable sources

www.integracija.gov.lv You have declined creating article about Inga Liepa - the most senior civil servant in the Republic of Latvia. There is only sixteen (16) so high top officials in Latvia. She is secretary of State. Article was provided with the source - official government home page of ministry, with her official curriculum vitae (http://www.integracija.gov.lv/?id=308&top=46&sa=62&doc=1248). Can you, please, explain me - what can be more reputable source than government offical information on top official - Secretary of State? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.199.125.107 (talk) 23:07, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] HollywoodChicago.com

A tag has been placed on HollywoodChicago.com, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to a user page from the main/article space.

If you can fix the redirect to point to a regular Wikipedia article rather than a user page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you are fixing the redirect. If you think the redirect should be retained as is for some reason, you can request that administrators wait a while before deleting it. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your reasoning on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --Geniac (talk) 02:13, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Wilhelmina_Will, I am really disappointed that after three admins have deleted HollywoodChicago.com and at least two other editors (not to mention all the editors in the previous debates and all the editors who have to delete the link spam pointing to HC.com to the various film pages) have objected to the creation of the article, you insist on recreating it. I think it is a good thing that you help out new users create articles, but in this case you are not following the spirit or the letter of Wikipedia's guidelines. I do not understand your belief that an inappropriate article can somehow be ok if you redirect it somewhere else for a while. The people who run HC.com have been repeatedly to spam Wikipedia every few months, and you are only letting them use you to continue the blatant promotion of this commercial website. --Marcinjeske (talk) 10:03, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
None of my business and all of that, and I have no idea regarding the notability of the website, but.. regarding HC spamming us, that really shouldn't impact our creation or deletion of an article for them. Like WP:SELF says, when it comes to those things, we should approach the situation as if we were not Wikipedia. -- Ned Scott 10:07, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Please, do make it your business... because although I am pretty sure about my stance... I have done all I can in terms of editing the actual page... I should have been more clear... when I say spam... I mean trying to create that article... HollywoodChicago.com has been created and subsequently deleted every few months. (see the article's talk page for more details). So no, I am not suggesting that spam in other parts of Wikipedia is grounds for an article to be included... but repeatedly trying to create the same self-promotional article when nothing about it's notability has changed and no reliable third-party sources have appeared is spam.
There is the separate issue of links to HC.com being placed in other articles in a clearly self-promotional way... but that is not the issue I complained about above. Sorry to not have been clearer. --Marcinjeske (talk) 10:45, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Ah, ok, that does make more sense then. -- Ned Scott 10:46, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Signpost updated for April 7th and 14th, 2008.

Sorry, it seems that the bot quit before completing its run last week. Here is the last two weeks' worth of Signpost. Ralbot (talk) 09:33, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery


Volume 4, Issue 15 7 April 2008 About the Signpost
April Fools' pranks result in temporary blocks for six admins WikiWorld: "Apples and oranges" 
News and notes: 100 x 5,000, milestones Wikipedia in the News 
Dispatches: Reviewers achieving excellence Features and admins 
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation 
Volume 4, Issue 16 14 April 2008 About the Signpost
From the editor 
Interview with the team behind one of the 2,000th featured articles Image placeholders debated 
WikiWorld: "Pet skunk" News and notes: Board meeting, milestones 
Wikipedia in the News Dispatches: Featured article milestone 
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 
The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 09:33, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] He's back

Thought I'd let you know TTN is back, since you were seeking his help.Fairfieldfencer FFF 18:53, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Signpost updated for April 21st, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery


Volume 4, Issue 17 21 April 2008 About the Signpost
BLP deletion rules discussed amidst controversial AFD Threat made against high school on Wikipedia, student arrested 
Global login, blocking features developed WikiWorld: "Disruptive technology" 
News and notes: Wikimania security, German print Wikipedia, milestones Wikipedia in the News 
Dispatches: Monthly updates of styleguide and policy changes WikiProject Report: The Simpsons 
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 
The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 16:57, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Message from 72.200.176.36

Note: Product ride time can be reduced any where from 10-20 minutes, on a fully charged battery, depending on riders weight; various riding conditions and/or if product has been properly maintained. Battery shows fully charged, but goes low after 10-15 minutes of use and/or unit run (very) slow. Try the following:

Check riders weight & riding conditions, do not exceed the weight limit, go up a steep hill or attempt to tow objects. It is best to avoid these conditions at all times. Check air pressure in front and rear tires, if pressure is low, inflate tires to recommended PSI (located on tire sidewall) Check chain tension. If chain is too tight, refer to pg 6 in owner's manual. Check front brake pads for signs that they are rubbing against the front tire (rim). If the brake pads are rubbing, readjust the brakes (Refer to pg 4 in Owner's Manual) Make sure charger is plugged into charger port correctly & indicator lights are working properly. If the charger is not plugged into the charger port correctly, then make sure to plug charger into charger port correctly and charger for 8 hours (refer to page 3 in the Owner's Manual.) Secure unit; turn power on & with NO weight on the unit, lift back end up & apply the throttle, if the rear wheel spins freely, then replace the battery.


Rear wheel barely moves. Try the following:

Lift rear end up and manually spin rear wheel forward. Should spin 3-4 times with no resistance. If the wheel does not spin freely, replace rear wheel.



Details +/− ProductsElectric

E300/300s
E200/200s
 Users who viewed this answer have also viewed

Battery won't take a charge Battery maintenance & storage Short ride time, runs slow, NOT holding a charge - E100/125/150 Short ride time, runs slow, NOT holding a charge - MX350/500/650 Short ride time, runs slow, NOT holding a charge - Pocket Mod/Sport Mod Previously Viewed Answers Short ride time, runs slow, NOT holding a charge - E100/125/150 Print Answer Email Answer


Close Window About Razor® the Colective is back USA | Razor® Products | Replacement Parts | Service & Repair | Help & Support | Contact | RipStik® Caster Board Copyright © 2003-2007 Razor USA LLC. All rights reserved. Razor®, RipStik®, Scream Machine®, Ground Force®, the A Logo Design and the Razor Logo Design are registered trademarks of Razor USA LLC and/or its affiliated companies in the United States and/or select foreign countries. Pocket Mod™, Sport Mod™, Dirt Rocket™, Rebellion™, Punk Rail™, Kiddie Kick™, Cruiser™, Bumper Buggie™, Pocket Rocket™, and Scuttle Bug™ are trademarks of Razor USA LLC.

Privacy

[edit] You're welcome, WW!

I'm honestly flattered by all your thanks :u) I appreciate you gratitude. I felt it was only right, seeing the obvious holes in the case against you. Congrats on making it out, alive! --Is this fact...? 22:24, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] By the Way

I'm not going to be editing any Wikipedia articles from now on -- I'm cutting the addiction. I'm still going to check my talk page messages, though, so feel free to keep writing me if you land in another pickle. I'll be glad to help :u)

Is this fact...? has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend and remember :"All men are created equal, but ambition, or lack of it, soon separates them." Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Is this fact...? has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

--Is this fact...? 09:08, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Re: A Pistol for Ringo

Please read the entire decline reason. It clearly says the article was declined out of a concern for the internal footnotes having absolutely no relevance to the items they cite. Redfarmer (talk) 20:40, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks

Hey, thanks for the cookies! Funny what can happen to your user pages when you're not even around ... That particular vandal has been making sockpuppets to add goofy stuff to the Liberace article. I don't quite get his point, but then there may not be one. Happy editing!  :) Antandrus (talk) 16:45, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Block for 48 hours

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 48 hours as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. You appear to have vandalized France. If this has been done in error, please contact me, or another admin at WP:AN. Bearian (talk) 00:56, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Lol, this is incorrect for two reasons. One, France hasn't even been edited since the fifth of May, at this point. 2. I would never vandalize a Wikipedia page; I always edit in good faith. And actually three: I love France, and any article relating to it is especially dear to me. So, using logic, this must be an incorrect accusation. But everyone makes mistakes. Have a good day!!! Winnifred-Ian-Leonard-Harry-Ellen-Lucy-Marilyn-Ingrid-Nora-Amanda Walter-Ira-Lauren-Lalla (talk) 01:07, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
There is also a fourth reason: I myself haven't edited the article since the seventh of April: [19], and this edit was in compliance with a discussion that the gallery section be abandoned. Winnifred-Ian-Leonard-Harry-Ellen-Lucy-Marilyn-Ingrid-Nora-Amanda Walter-Ira-Lauren-Lalla (talk) 01:12, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Crossposted from the blocking admins talk page: I am not sure I understand the reason for the block. Whatever else I could say, there does not appear to be any vandalism from looking at her contrib log to France or any other articles. The user actually reverted vandalism here and a not useful edit here. Earlier fix was for Nice. Is there a chance you confused this user with the vandals WW was reverting. --Marcinjeske (talk) 04:04, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

His? Tsk tsk. No, this user is a she. Winnifred-Ian-Leonard-Harry-Ellen-Lucy-Marilyn-Ingrid-Nora-Amanda Walter-Ira-Lauren-Lalla (talk) 04:10, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
Bearian undid himself right away He musta screwed up something. Not sure what, but everyone makes innocent mistakes, and he self corrected it. --Jayron32.talk.contribs 04:12, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
Yes, it was an innocent mistake, a royal screw-up, and I corrected it myself immediately, erasing what I thought would be embarrassing for all. I am very sorry for the mistake. Bearian (talk) 15:10, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
Regarding His?' - I actually was aware you were female... and after catching myself using the wrong pronoun towards the end of the message... I went through to double-check.. and fixed one or two places... somehow I missed that last one (probably because it was in a link). What always throws me off is the "Will"... desolé. As for why I even brought this up... I saw that in the log Bearian had unblocked, but the reason given was "Insufficient warning" ... which made it sound like WW had vandalized but hadn't been warned about it. Since past blocks reflect badly on an editor, I just wanted to make sure that the record was clear. Of course it was an innocent mistake.. and Bearian corrected it quickly. --Marcinjeske (talk) 02:26, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
Image:Antiflame-barnstar.png The Anti-Flame Barnstar
Thanks for being cool about this. Bearian (talk) 15:29, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] 5/8 DYK

Updated DYK query On 8 May 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article George Davenport, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Bedford 01:47, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] The first of three messages from that "Toofy" guy

The Toofy Mcjack Yum Yum cookies Award
Eh heh heh he heh Fanks for dee coookies dey were deewishish eh heh heh heh. Toofy Mcjack 16:42, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Toofy sez fanks:

The Toofy Mcjack Yum Yum cookies Award
Eh heh heh he heh Fanks for dee coookies dey were deewishish eh heh heh heh. Toofy Mcjack 16:42, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Yoo no can bwock toofy

Eh heh heh heh heh Yoo can nopt stop toofy.... toofy es unbwockable eh heh heh fanks again for dee koocies eh heh heh

You're absolutely right, in that I cannot block you. For one thing, I am not yet an administrator, and I daresay it'll be some time before I have enough time to go and nominate myself. As for those cookies, I know how you got them, and I did not give them to you, you stole them from Antandrus's talk page. I can prove it right here.: [20] [21] Luckily, User:Tiggerjay very kindly reverted your vandalism right afterwards: [22] Anyway, whether you keep coming back or not, the admins are always hot on vandalizer's trails, so you will be caught each time. Have a nice day!!! Winnifred-Ian-Leonard-Harry-Ellen-Lucy-Marilyn-Ingrid-Nora-Amanda Walter-Ira-Lauren-Lalla (talk) 04:48, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] For all your wonderful work

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
I award Wilhelmina Will this star for her tireless, exceptional, well-researched, well-referenced, and much-needed contributions to the project, particularly by working from Articles for Creation: very fine work indeed! Antandrus (talk) 02:56, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit]  !

Is this fact...? has hugged you! Hugs promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better (and hopefully wasn't meant as an invasion of personal space). Spread the WikiLove by hugging at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Hug others by adding {{subst:Hug}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

[edit] Signpost updated for May 2nd and 9th, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery


Volume 4, Issue 18 2 May 2008 About the Signpost
From the editor 
Wikimedia Board to expand, restructure Arbitrator leaves Wikipedia 
Bot approvals group, checkuser nominations briefly held on RfA WikiWorld: "World domination" 
News and notes: Board elections, milestones Wikipedia in the News 
Dispatches: Did You Know ... Features and admins 
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation 
Volume 4, Issue 19 9 May 2008 About the Signpost
Sister Projects Interview: Wikiversity WikiWorld: "They Might Be Giants" 
News and notes: Board elections, milestones Wikipedia in the News 
Dispatches: Featured content from schools and universities Features and admins 
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation 
Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:03, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks for creating War of the Rats

Thanks for creating this article. It is a really good book. =] WinterSpw (talk) 04:49, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Short articles

Hi. To answer the question you left in your last edit summary, you need to add a lot more content to an article than just a single sentence and an external link. In other words, someone researching the subject already knows they're researching an extinct sea turtle. If you're planning to expand these, please do so before they're either redirected again or nominated for speedy deletion. Hope this helps. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 04:03, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

  • Wow, looks as if you've done quite a few of these. My suggestion would be to flesh out the ones you have before creating any more. It'll save you the hassle of having to answer speedy deletions and redirects. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 04:05, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

With all due respect, it's up to the creator to create something suitable for an end user of the site and not other editors. If you're collaborating with other editors in creating these, please accept my apologies. Otherwise, you might want to take a peek at WP:STUB. That will give yo a good idea of what needs to go into a new stub. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 04:10, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

You're truly one of the good ones.  :) Good luck and have fun! --PMDrive1061 (talk) 14:51, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

PMDrive1061 (talk) has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

[edit] Could you please?

Could you please help me out with television writers, producers and directors? Do you want my email address? Or you could give me yours. Susan Wald, award winning writer on GH but no page for her. Much appreciated. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.68.101.105 (talk) 18:58, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] possible pg creations

Are These Notable To You?
Steven Williford ([23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31]), Angela Tessinari [32], B.M. Simmons [33], Robert Bella [34], James Bosley [35], Richard Polonetsky, Barry Brodsky [36], P. D'Andrea [37], S. Kirshenbaum [38], J. Barker ([39] [40], [41], [42],[43], [44], [45], [46], [47], [48], [49], [50], [51], [52], [53]), David Barr III [54]

[edit] AfC

Hi there, I see you're helping out at Afc, so thanks for that, any help is welcome to avoid the ghost of the backlog ever returning :) Anyway, I'd just like to give you a little pointer, when you create an article from an Afc submission you have to add a little disclaimer in the edit summary explaining that the article was created thru Afc and giving credit to the IP that submitted it. This is required by the GFDL so we really have to follow it. This is what I use: This article was created as part of the Wikipedia:Articles for creation backlong effort, submitted by IP: though of course any variation is fine. Thanks for helping out! Acer (talk) 21:48, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

No problem, and thanks again for lending a hand :) Acer (talk) 22:11, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi again! Thanks for heeding my suggestion above, but theres an importating detail missing from you edit summaries (it was my fault though for not making it clear): The actual IP number. You have to say who it was that submitted the article to give proper credit per the GFDL, so saying it was submitted by an IP is not enought, you have to list the number. Sorry for the confusion Acer (talk) 23:37, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] what about Switzer?

Michael Switzer is a prolific American television and movie director. His credits include Prison Break, Lincoln Heights, Vanished, Ordinary Miracles, Annie's Point, Fallen Angel, Peacemakers, NYPD Blue, JAG, That's Life, Three Days, Philly, The Moving of Sophia Myles, Miracle On The Mountain: The Kincaid Family Story, Miracle On The 17th Green, God's New Plan, Forever Love, Best Friends for Life, Holiday in Your Heart, Unwed Father, Unlikely Angel, What Love Sees, The Making of A Hollywood Madam, Mary Higgins Clark's Remember Me, Past The Bleachers, Cries From The Heart, Children of The Dark, Fergie & Andrew: Behind The Palace Doors, Pros and Cons, Gabriel's Fire, Quantum Leap, Revealing Evidence: Stalking The Honolulu Strangler, Summer Dreams: The Story of The Beach Boys, Island Son, Police Story: Burnout, Frank Nitti: The Enforcer, Beauty and The Beast, Rags to Riches, Fame, Misfits of Science, Riptide, M*A*S*H, and Hill Street Blues.

IMDB: Switzer —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.66.36.140 (talk) 04:21, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Signpost updated for May 12th, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery


Volume 4, Issue 20 12 May 2008 About the Signpost
Explicit sexual content draws fire Sighted revisions introduced on the German Wikipedia 
Foundation receives copyright claim from church Board to update privacy policy, adopts data retention policy 
Update on Citizendium Board candidacies open through May 22 
Two wiki events held in San Francisco Bay Area New feature enables users to bypass IP blocks 
WikiWorld: "Tony Clifton" News and notes: Autoconfirmed level, milestones 
Wikipedia in the News Dispatches: Changes at Featured lists 
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 
The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 10:07, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Plagiarism

Would you care to explain why you plagiarized my work here? It's apparent you read the to-do list on my user page by creating Equality North Carolina and City Market in Raleigh, but how about doing your own research and not copying my work. Also, the Equality NC article is a mess and you need to fix it. APK yada yada 08:45, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

There are a number of pointers here:
  1. You seemed to be taking a while, so I decided to make things easier.
  2. You did say "Feel free to create them as well"
  3. In the editing boxes of any page, it says "If you don't want your writing to be edited mercilessly or redistributed for profit by others, do not submit it."
  4. If you want to work on them, no one is stopping you. This is a free encyclopedia, which anyone can edit.

Have a good day! Winnifred-Ian-Leonard-Harry-Ellen-Lucy-Marilyn-Ingrid-Nora-Amanda Walter-Ira-Lauren-Lalla (talk) 08:59, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

FYI, there is now a topic on ANI related to this. APK yada yada 09:07, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
No need to reply. The article has been deleted. From now on, I'd appreciate if you would do your own homework instead of copying from others. APK yada yada 11:21, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi Wilhemina, you can of course create any article that needs to be created. However, you can't copy and paste material from one place on Wikipedia to another because that violates the GFDL. When you copied and pasted the Moore Square article, material that AgnosticPreachersKid wrote looked like it was written by you, and that is not acceptable. That is why SeraphimWhipp deleted it. Aleta Sing 15:11, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
Whether you delete a child of mine or not, APK, you still have no right to edit any of my usersubpages. Do not do so again. Winnifred-Ian-Leonard-Harry-Ellen-Lucy-Marilyn-Ingrid-Nora-Amanda Walter-Ira-Lauren-Lalla (talk) 19:54, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
Anyway, Mr. APK, you don't have to worry about me doing that again. I got what I wanted to get done done, now it's back to creating missing extinct creatures and what's suggested in AFC. Winnifred-Ian-Leonard-Harry-Ellen-Lucy-Marilyn-Ingrid-Nora-Amanda Walter-Ira-Lauren-Lalla (talk) 20:03, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

A child? You have so many issues it's not even funny. What you did was dishonest and claiming that you "mothered" it on your creation page is dishonest. From now on I'm watching your "creation" page to see what else you might be stealing. Stick to creating your own work and everything will be find and dandy in WP land. Oh yeah, nice try with pointing the finger at me in regards to editing your subpage where you lied about writing the article. You had no problems with going into my subpages and stealing my work, now did you? We now know you're a thief and a liar. APK yada yada 06:16, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Did I at any time make a change to your page? Look in the history of your sandbox. Do you see my name anywhere? And I have a distinct system for how my userpages are edited, and what you did disrupted that system. You've gotten what you wanted; mine was executed and yours was born. That's enough. Stop defending yourself and please do not come back here again. Thank you. The ''Gorgeous Girl''!!! (talk) 06:19, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] barker

Jeff Barker is an American writer and playwright. [55], [56], [57], [58],[59], [60], [61], [62], [63], [64], [65], [66], [67], [68], [69] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.66.36.140 (talk) 02:50, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Jackie Mitchell (baseball player)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Jackie Mitchell (baseball player), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.jeanpatrick.com/jackielife.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 01:09, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] 5/20 DYK

Updated DYK query On 20 May 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Equality North Carolina, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Bedford Pray 00:20, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Thank you

For cleaning my page.  :) I posted on ANI a few minutes ago about this, and now I'm leaving town for a few days. Happy editing! Antandrus (talk) 22:31, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Antandrus problem

You keep on playing like you did and you will have problems, let go of antandrus comments you idiot

You keep on playing like you did and you will have problems, let go of antandrus comments you idiot, the posting is not breaking any rules, i will report you for this

You keep on playing like you did and you will have problems with your administratorship, let go of antandrus comments, the posting is not breaking any rules, i will report you for this.

You keep on playing like you did and you will have problems with your administratorship, let go of antandrus comments, the posting is not breaking any rules. Antandrus posted other names I am not, so its against rules to provoke people, he always does that knowing I will react. And you do not have to be his slave!

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:64.107.220.174&diff=214495646&oldid=214495072 But you cant break rules!

Ok, so now we cool ? I did not mean to offend at first you but if i tell you what antandrus did to me, you would never believe me, after all he is your 'friend'... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.107.220.174 (talk) 20:40, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Mystriosuchus

I'll have a look and see what I can do over the next couple of days. J. Spencer (talk) 04:55, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] And again...

...Thank you for watching over my talk page while I was away. It's very much in the spirit of this exceptionally important little page; and it's like having a neighbor watch over your house and water your plants while you are gone on vacation. I appreciate it a lot. Happy editing! Antandrus (talk) 05:20, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Toliver Craig, Sr.

Updated DYK query On 26 May 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Toliver Craig, Sr., which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 07:03, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Premier Reserve League 2008-09

Earlier today you rejected my article on this subject due to it had no sources. I understand that all proposed articles should have them, however some sujects like this one are hard to find sources for them. The information given in this article has followed on from the previous season and doesn’t really need a source. I would like you to read Premier Reserve League 2007-08 and then reconsider my article for creation. Thank You.

92.12.193.58 27 May 2008 23:19

[edit] May 2008

Please do not create hoaxes, such as you did in the article Golden Gate Highway. Cease and desist from introducing misinformation into Wikipedia if you are attempting to test our ability to detect and remove it. This has been done before, with universally negative results. Hoaxes are marked for deletion shortly after they are created. Kindly — do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method is to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia, and then to check to see how long they have been in place and, if possible, correct them. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia policy to learn more about this project and how you can make a positive impact. Thanks, --75.47.158.106 (talk) 22:31, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Here's the deal with the IP

The guy in Wikipedia:Requests for comment/75.47.x.x requested a bunch of redirects at AFC. As is par for his course, several were fine but the majority were nonsense. You innocently created them; I tagged them for deletion and the IP is going after you (again something he's done before with other AFC workers). --NE2 00:11, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] 5/28 DYK

Updated DYK query On 28 May 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Rachel Wall, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Bedford Pray 02:08, 28 May 2008 (UTC)