Talk:Williamson diamond mine

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Diamond Williamson diamond mine is part of WikiProject Gemology and Jewelry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Gemstones, Jewelry, and related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
B This article has been rated as b-class on the quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale.

Article Grading:
The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

This article is supported by WikiProject Gemology and Jewelry, business subpage.

Williamson diamond mine was a good article, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these are addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Delisted version: No date specified. To provide a date use: {{DelistedGA|insert date in any format here}}

[edit] Delisted GA

There are no images. slambo 16:47, 23 October 2005 (UTC)

Re: The date Tanzania achieved independence -- it's 1961, not 1971

The line in the "History" section reading "equal partnership between De Beers and the colonial government of Tanganyika on August 13, 1958. In 1971, upon Tanzania's independence, the government nationalized the mine." Tanzania actually became independent in 1961 -- that is, not 1971-- and federated with Zanzibar in, I think, 1964.

While the date of independence is clear, I didn't change the text because I wasn't sure of the date the mine was initially nationalized.

Incidentally, I was speaking today to the son of someone who knew Dr. Williamson, and they told me the key factor about him -- though it often goes unmentioned -- was that he was a hopeless alcoholic. A lot of his behavior is more comprehensible if this is understood, though so far it is only an oral source.FurnaldHall 05:11, 16 September 2007 (UTC)