Talk:William Wesley

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the William Wesley article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Start	This article has been rated as start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]

This article was nominated for deletion on 1st May 2007. The result of the discussion was Keep.

Contents 1 Pro shoe? 2 References 3 Category: Mysterious people 4 a mysterious figure

[edit] Pro shoe?

Rolando 21:29, 4 January 2006 (UTC) : This information on ProShoe is interesting but what is the source? Please contact me by clicking on my name at left and then clicking "email this user" on my user page. Thanks.

[edit] References

I took a first crack at adding notes and references. I have not seen the GQ article on Wesley and D. Wagner.

[edit] Category: Mysterious people

I added this article to the category "Mysterious people." The rules for inclusion in that category are pretty hazy, but Wesley seems mysterious enough to me! Rolando 16:34, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] a mysterious figure

putting William Wesley is a mysterious figure in the first sentence/paragraph just doesn't make sense. This is an enclopedia, the first paragraph should be clear on what he does that made him significant enough to have a page on wikipedia. I've never heard of this person before. And after reading the entire article, i still don't know know what he does? The only fact i read was that he knows some big name players. How does that make him mysterious? Z3u2 17:43, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

You're right. There nothing in the article that makers this man "mysterious." He sounds like he knows a lot of people and that's about it. There's certainly value in knowing people, especially certain people, but there's nothing "mysterious" about the fact. That he knows folks is right there for all to admire.

But the question is how he knows people. Nobody has been able to find out how he came to be the most connected man in American basketball, or how he made enough money that he's not seen working. He was completely off the radar and then all of a sudden he's in the corner of every picture. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.149.98.36 (talk) 03:53, 23 May 2008 (UTC)