Talk:William Henry Leonard Poe

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

William Henry Leonard Poe is currently a good article nominee. An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the good article criteria. Further reviews are welcome from any editor who has not contributed significantly to this article, and can be added to the review page, but the decision whether or not to to list the article as a good article should be left to the first reviewer. Date: 03:13, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

This article was nominated for deletion on 13 May 2008. The result of the discussion was keep.

	William Henry Leonard Poe is part of WikiProject Poetry, a WikiProject related to Poetry.
B	This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale.
Low	This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
B	This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]

It is requested that a picture or pictures of this person be included in this article to improve its quality.

A fact from William Henry Leonard Poe appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on 18 May 2008.

[edit] Deletion discussion

I AM SORRY BUT I HAVE TO DISAGREE WITH YOU. YES I DID USE THAT CITE AS A SOURCE BUT NOT AS COPYRIGHTING. DO YOU SEE THAT EXACT SENTENCE ANYWHERE? ALSO, PEOPLE CAN ADD ON TO THIS CITE AS NEEDED THIS IS JUST A START. I AM ALSO SORRY ABOUT DELETING THE SECURITY THING ON EDGAR ALLAN POE...

I belive now this might be a more useful cite. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Corpus1 (talk • contribs) 00:44, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

I would support the speedy deletion of this article. Though I could probably prove the notability of W. H. L. Poe, it would take some work... and this current article is incredibly inaccurate and poorly written. --Midnightdreary (talk) 01:11, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Addendum: In regards to the above comment by the article's creator... I haven't seen any copyright concerns. That's not what we're talking about. --Midnightdreary (talk) 01:13, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

I've cleaned this up a bit but am not knowledgeable on the topic. There do seem to be sufficient sources though to establish the notability of this person, and hopefully it will survive the deletion debate.--Bigtimepeace | talk | contribs 07:32, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Their was a copywright problem at first, but I fixed that...besides this was my first page. In the future there will be better starts for the pages. Thank everyone for their participation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Corpus1 (talk • contribs) 20:44, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Photo?

Umm... a request for a photo has been issued from WP:BIOGRAPHY. As far as I know, there are no known images of William Henry Leonard Poe. I guess I could draw one right now but I can't imagine how accurate it would be. I may remove the request in a few days as it seems odd. Thoughts? --Midnightdreary (talk) 21:20, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Then the article needs to include this fact.--Cazo3788 (talk) 21:28, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

You'll have to show me the policy that says that. As I understood it, images are not a requirement in articles. Additionally, I'd have to do some serious searching to find a source that makes the obvious statement that no images of WHL exist, then find a logical place to put it so that it doesn't disrupt the flow of text. --Midnightdreary (talk) 21:34, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

I have to agree that this is a strange request. The earliest Daguerreotype seems to have been around 1837, 6 years after WHL Poe died (interestingly we have a daguerreotype of Edgar displayed on that article). I don't understand why we need to explain there is no photograph for someone who was not alive when early photography was perfected (apparently the first photo was 1826, but it took eight hours to do and the technique needed improvement). WHL Poe died young and was not prominent or wealthy so it's very unlikely there are any surviving portraits of him either. The article has a couple of images which is probably just about the best we can do. I can't think of a good way to say "by the way there's no pictures of this guy" in the article and I don't know that we can even prove that definitively (maybe there's a rough sketch of him somewhere, who knows). I don't see a problem removing this request and I would hope that the lack of a photo or portrait does not effect the GA review of this article. It's rare that we'll have images of not-so-prominent people who died before the mid-19th century and there's really nothing we can do about that.--Bigtimepeace | talk | contribs 19:53, 6 June 2008 (UTC)