Talk:William Charles Wells

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This article is supported by the Science and academia work group.
This article is part of the History of Science WikiProject, an attempt to improve and organize the history of science content on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You can also help with the History of Science Collaboration of the Month.
??? This article has not yet been assigned a rating on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet been assigned a rating on the importance scale.
Charles Darwin This article is part of WikiProject Evolutionary biology, an attempt at building a useful set of articles on evolutionary biology and its associated subfields such as population genetics, quantitative genetics, molecular evolution, phylogenetics, evolutionary developmental biology. It is distinct from the WikiProject Tree of Life in that it attempts to cover patterns, process and theory rather than systematics and taxonomy. If you would like to participate, there are some suggestions on this page (see also Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ for more information) or visit WikiProject Evolutionary biology.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the assessment scale.
??? This article has not yet received an importance rating on the assessment scale.


[edit] Two essays

Re: recent edits. I moved the bit about two essays because it doesn't make grammatical sense and I couldn't work out what was being said. If the text is to be reverted, could it also be made to make sense? It just says "Two essays <blah> and <blah>", with no text to clarify. And then in the next paragraph it starts "In this paper ...", but which paper? Before the "Two essays" bit there is mention of a paper - is it this one? And if not, it needs to be made clear what it's referring to. Cheers, --Plumbago 13:09, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

Cheers Duncharris - much better! Thanks, --Plumbago 15:27, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Ophthalmology

There's an opportunity here for someone to do a section on Wells' research into ophthalmology. Macdonald-ross (talk) 10:08, 17 January 2008 (UTC)