Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2007-07-09/Bureaucrat nominations

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Cecropia only started doing them as I left them for a week. It's "interesting" that he is seen as the person doing them all. I left them for a week as I was sick to death of spending hours doing vanity renaming. They go in fashions - people want to be renamed to single letter names as it's cool, then someone decided that non-latin alphabet names are cool.. Does this benefit the encylopedia? It's a total waste of someone's time - we are far too liberal with renaming. No-one suffers from not being renamed to something they've decided is cleverer. I've refused to do the non Latin renaming as I can see no benefit to the encylopedia and serious drawbacks. I suspect the vain are looking for more compliant 'crats. Secretlondon 10:16, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Secretlondon, I don't think your comment here is going to get much attention. Very few people, if any, are going to have this page watchlisted (the only reason I saw your note is because I had fixed a couple of typos in the article, and I have the "automatically watchlist any page you edit" setting checked). If this is a concern of yours, I think you need to raise it in a different venue (and my apologies for saying so because I am sure you already have). Regards, Newyorkbrad 14:10, 10 July 2007 (UTC)