Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK geography/Announcements
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Would it be appropriate to set a time limit for announcements eg anything older than 3 months gets deleted?— Rod talk 09:25, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- Sounds good to me. Epbr123 15:07, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
Also, how about giving candidates priority over successes? i.e. peer review and featured article candidates remain on this page for as long as they remain open, and if the page gets too long, we delete the "news" items before we delete the actionable items. My original thinking behind this page was that it would alert us to articles that need attention, e.g. because they're on peer review or FAC, rather than being news. Of course, I admit to not being very good at following and working on the PRs and FACs myself. Joe D (t) 20:13, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
- I would agree that candidates are important - perhaps the box could be split into 2 - one half giving recent annoncements & the other giving 5 recent candidacies? Or we could rename it from announcements to current exemplars (or a better name). If it was done now WP:GAC includes: Bath Abbey, Skye, Kingston upon Hull, Lealholm, Flat Holm, Channel Tunnel, Glasgow, Paisley, Kilmarnock and Ayr Railway, Severn Beach Line and Anglesey Central Railway. At WP:FAC is Charing Cross, Euston & Hampstead Railway. If these all qualify (? the railways) it would mean removal of almost all the current announcements of promotions etc which might seem a bit harsh on the people who worked hard on them, as the max list of 10 items seems to include less than 3 months proposed above.— Rod talk 19:26, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia:Peer review/Brownhills
Please stop by and take a look :-) ChrisTheDude 11:16, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
