Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Sociology/Portal
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Portal:Sociology has been proposed from Wikipedia:WikiProject_Community and Wikipedia:WikiProject_Sociology.
[edit] Support
- I second that --T.S.Boncompte 22:35, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
- I think this portal is needed and I would be pleased to help work on it. - CQ 13:59, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
- Yar. Lucidish 19:02, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
- Of course - but unfortunately we have too few people interested in sociology to pull it off, I am afraid.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk 20:50, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
- Support, as in I would really like to see one. Doesn't bode well that there it has taken five months to get four votes. --Delta Tango | Talk 00:37, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
- Support. There are tons of articles related to sociology which could need some proper teamwork, coordination and classification out there. Why this hasn't been made yet? --Ludvig 16:50, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- Support. Per Ludvig. Start small and simple. Let it grow over time. --Reswik 23:36, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- I think that it may be slow going but there are a great deal of articles on sociology and I think that it deserves a portal. Perhaps slow going is better than not going at all.Canticle 07:35, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- Strong Support Sociology is one of the most complicated sciences. Also I think we should merg Portal:Society with this new Portal:Sociology. -- Walter Humala Godsave him! (wanna Talk?) 15:13, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
- Support. The more, the merrier - if enough people are interested. Smokizzy 02:55, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
- Support I would be willing to do a little. Jvbishop 20:16, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
- Support. --JorisvS 19:39, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
- Support A sociology portal is a good idea. It could cover other topics associated with sociology as well. --Grrrlriot (talk) 21:35, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Ok lets do it.
Ok we have 11 people signed their names. I started the proposed portal so lets get to work on it. Jvbishop 19:42, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] article on Role
So, after following a trail of unrelated copyright violations, I found Role and my heart sank... I was finding that the test of the article duplicated other wikipedia articles in large segments with no links... the best way i can describe it is if you took all the article for topics related to Role and pasted them together into the same document. It looks like the article was part of some class project... so probably made in good faith, but attempting to reintegrate it into Wikipedia is going to be a lot of work. Looking to pull in some interest from here...--Marcinjeske (talk) 13:05, 29 April 2008 (UTC)