Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Slipknot/AoF

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject Slipknot
This box: view • talk • edit
Information

Before nominating and voting, please read and understand the How To page.

Contents

[edit] Nominations

Please put the name of the article on this list and your username and timestamp beside it. An example can be found on the How To page.

Nominations are now open for the fourth AoF, please post nominations directly below this.

  1. Vol. 3: (The Subliminal Verses) - Blackngold29 (talk) 22:19, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
    1. —Burningclean [Speak the truth!] 18:43, 16 March 2008 (UTC) I'd say get the albums out of the way first.
    2. Yeah, that makes sense now. I will help out on Vol.3 with sourcing and styles. Dark Executioner (talk) 01:46, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
    3. Good idea. Thanks for reading. Thundermaster (talk · contribs) 13:41, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

# Corey Taylor - Dark Executioner (talk) 16:47, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Votes

Please put your username and timestamp beside the article you are voting for. Example: ##~~~~, more information can be found on the How To page.

Votes will be open for the fourth AoF as soon as the third AoF is removed from focus.

[edit] Templates

Hey, I made templates. Check them out: {{CurrentWPSlipAoF}} and {{PastWPSlipAoF}} —Burningclean [Speak the truth!] 03:50, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

I like them. Sweet man! Blackngold29 (talk) 04:18, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
I didn't design them myself, I just transformed the Wikiproject Alternative Music templates. But thank you! —Burningclean [Speak the truth!] 04:20, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Promoting

I just have a quick question, before we start a new AoF, shouldn't we try promoting the past articles to a better status? Slipknot needs a copyedit, bigtime. Slipknot needs a copyedit, and Slipknot discography should go to FLC. —Burningclean [Speak the truth!] 22:32, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, promotion should be dealt with before we start working on another AoF. Thanks for reading, ThunderMaster UTC 08:42, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
So do you guys think that after the discography is removed from focus we should have a "Promotion Period" in which the project focuses it's attention on attaining higher status for articles within the project's scope? For example, in this one we could focus on Slipknot (album) and Slipknot discography and maybe Slipknot (band). Rezter TALK 10:45, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
Yes. I think that would be a good idea. If we keep going on with new AoF projects, we will have a backlog of terrific articles that are not at a better status. I think we should definatly start off with getting Slipknot (band) to FA. —Burningclean [Speak the truth!] 21:45, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
We should try to spend longer on articles to get them to their best before we let them leave AoF (or get them some sort of promotion). Thanks for reading, ThunderMaster UTC 09:50, 18 February 2008 (UTC)