Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Scouting/MOS

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Scouting Wiki Project Wikipedia WikiProject Scouting/MOS is part of the Scouting WikiProject, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Scouting and Guiding on the Wikipedia. This includes but is not limited to boy and girl organizations, WAGGGS and WOSM organizations as well as those not so affiliated, country and region-specific topics, and anything else related to Scouting. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
NA This page is not an article and does not require a rating on the quality scale.

[edit] References vs external links

I like the references, or footnotes at the bottom of the page. I disagree with the way we've laid out the article format here. --evrik (talk) 13:55, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

Could you be more specific? Per Wikipedia:Guide to layout, Footnotes go before External links.
The redirect from merge is listed in Wikipedia:WikiProject Scouting/Article maintenance, as this is not a style guide issue.

--Gadget850 ( Ed) 14:05, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Guide to layout is a guideline and not a policy. If your read the talk portion of the page you will see that there is disagreement on the point. Also, WP:CITE#Footnotes says,

A footnote is a note placed at the bottom of a page of a document to comment on a part of the main text, or to provide a reference for it, or both. The connection between the relevant text and its footnote is indicated by a number or symbol which appears both after the relevant text and before the footnote.

  1. Place a <ref> ... </ref> where you want a footnote reference number to appear in an article—type the text of the note between the ref tags.
  2. Place the <references/> tag in a "Notes" or "References" section near the end of the article—the list of notes will be generated here.
So, there is no real consensus. If you want to add a line saying that it is optional where the references go, i'm okay with that. --evrik (talk) 15:09, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
Like "The given order of sections is also encouraged but may be varied"? --Gadget850 ( Ed) 15:11, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
  • sure. --evrik (talk) 16:22, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Non-national articles