Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Sailor Moon/References
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Request for clean up
Since this is a references page, I'd like to clean it up to delete signatures and make it look like a real wikipedia page. Yes, I know it's not really for public consumption, but call it pride... Is that alright? --Hitsuji Kinno 18:36, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
- Sounds great. Good idea. --Masamage ♫ 21:33, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
- I just had a thought... we are missing the anime books. Muhahaha. Now to find the ISBNs... anyone volunteer, or should I add them. Why add them, because there is a reference to the elusive Serenity Palace which shows briefly in the Chibiusa flashback and in the beginning credits which I've taken the liberty of screen shotting. In addition to direct references for Seiyuu, their pictures, and other stuff that might be better to have the original reference with the translation than the translation itself. I cleared out the signatures and did a bit of clean up for "I" and personal opinions, etc. Ian Miller section has to be cleaned up too since it was not meant for article space. --Hitsuji Kinno 01:26, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Two Items Removed
I have removed two items from this list. No matter what guidelines you'd like to think you can set, advocating the use of sites as references that do not meet WP:RS is totally inappropriate. Of even greater concern, both sites violates Wikipedia's stick guidelines regarding copyrights, and as such should not be linked to. Collectonian (talk) 20:43, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
- I've also been bold and rewrote some parts so they actually follow Wikipedia guidelines and policies. We emphasize secondary reliable sources, not primary sources for details apart from plot and basic character information. This inappropriate emphasis on primary sources is why many of the Sailor Moon articles fail WP:FICT. I also clarified what should and should not be used as a reference, again using WP:RS and WP:V as a starting point. Neither the guideline nor the policy should be so easily dismissed or ignored, as the original text was doing. Collectonian (talk) 21:14, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
