Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Redirect
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archives |
1 |
This is the talk page for WikiProject Redirect. Please feel free to create a sub-page in order to branch out from this page if you wish to create a new proposal. If you do so, please leave a comment here so that other editors know of its existence!
[edit] New proposals
I have made two new proposals and will put them on the following sub-page: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Redirect/Format and categorization proposals. Please drop a line there and let me know what you think! Lenoxus " * " 17:00, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] New meta-template(s) idea
Lately, I've become involved with the notion of a "standard" redirect template. The latest mix of ideas I've hit upon, while possibly workable, are just a little beyond my proficiency with wikicode.
Basically, here's what I've got in mind: Imagine two templates, hypothetically called {{R reasons}} and {{R also}}, into which other R templates, plus user-input text, can be included as parameters. (If it's possible for those templates to contain "alternate versions", then this could remove the redundancy of seeing "This is a redirect" over and over, and reduce the number of typed braces.) I'm imagining that such templates would be collapsible, like {{WikiProjectBanners}} and {{WikiProjectBannerShell}}. They would be used in addition to a header template perhaps called RDR.
A hypothetical example of what I'm talking about: typing {{rdr}} {{r reasons|(target title)|abbreviation|tense|also='''Custom reason''': Custom.}} {{r also|disambiguation|also='''Custom''': Custom.}}
would produce something like:
Does anyone feel up to the task of producing such a template? Are there any suggestions to tweak what I've put forth? Feel free to display any potential versions of this template here… thanks! Lenoxus " * " 19:41, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
- Looks to be an excellent idea, although the first template [rdr] seems unnecessary on the main redirect page, as the arrow already there makes it obvious that it is a redirect. The second & third templates look excellent, however, and would certainly help [standardisation = Good ThingTM]. The current set of redirect templates is growing out of control, and this would also allow multiple reasons to be appended to one redirect. I think this deserves more eyeballs, so I'll put it on the Proposals pump [hope you don't mind] to gain wider consensus. Oh, and I will make that template as an example for the proposal, and I am also willing to add them to redirects using my
slaveAWB account if this gains momentum. RichardΩ612 Ɣ ɸ 19:56, May 18, 2008 (UTC)
I have created a prototype template here. It contains options for the three reasons here [abbrev, tense & other] using {{ambox}} [as all mainspace templates should, really]. It can easily be expanded to fit other reasons but has only these three for testing purposes. RichardΩ612 Ɣ ɸ 21:02, May 18, 2008 (UTC)