Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Nudity
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Nudity, which collaborates on articles related to nudity and naturism topics. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| NA | This page is not an article and does not require a rating on the quality scale. |
| NA | This page is not an article and does not require a rating on the importance scale. |
[edit] Project started
OK, I've got the main project pages setup. I'll be filling out the sub-pages as time permits. Next up is a big batch of article tagging for those willing to help. --StuffOfInterest (talk) 17:52, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Gotta say it
- "The template header needs an image!"
- Okay, someone had to say it... but really, some detail from a rennaissance painting or something wouldn't be too bad. Something tasteful but not necessarily even genital/chest nude. Just a thought.
- Either way, someone had to say it...! :-D • VigilancePrime • • • 01:29 (UTC) 2 Apr '08
- That's why I put an item in the ToDo list specifically for a template image. A link to any existing image which you think would be appropriate would be most welcome. --StuffOfInterest (talk) 12:04, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
- I stuck in an art/statue picture for now. If you see something better plesae go ahead and replace the image, or bring it here for consideration if you want. --StuffOfInterest (talk) 14:47, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
- That's why I put an item in the ToDo list specifically for a template image. A link to any existing image which you think would be appropriate would be most welcome. --StuffOfInterest (talk) 12:04, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Public nudity in the United States
I think we should consider putting Public nudity in the United States out of its misery. The article makes dubious claims in the first two sentences and the first reference is actually being taken out of context. On top of that, there isn't a single article out there linking to this one. --StuffOfInterest (talk) 14:53, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
- Well, a prod ended up being good enough. Good ridance to a lousy article. --StuffOfInterest (talk) 11:49, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
