Wikipedia talk:WikiProject LGBT studies/Coordinator

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Previous Elections

The following discussion is archived. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

[edit] February 2007

There is only one candidate for the role of the first LGBT Coordinator. The nomination is reproduced below. Please support below or make any other comments or ask questions. Voting will last last 7 days.

[edit] Dev920 (talk · contribs)

Vote count: 32

OK. I'll start the ball rolling. A few months ago this project had very much lost momentum and was virtually dead in the water. Dev920 resurrected it and has kick-started a number of brilliant initiatives. Over 80 people have joined the project since then. The project pages have been updated and the portal is looking pretty good. Dev920 has started a vast number of initiatives to keep people involved and focus efforts. Notable examples include Jumpaclass and Peer review. I cannot even guess how many articles have been tagged since she joined (though someone is bound to tell me shortly). Her enthousiasm for new ideas appears boundless and her guidance has been inspirational. In my opinion she already acts as this project's coordinator and deserves to be recognised as such. WJBscribe 02:37, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Seconded. Jeffpw 09:48, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Support

  1. Naturally as nom. WjBscribe 17:24, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
  2. Obviously. Raystorm 17:55, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
  3. Enthusiastic support for the person who has already demonstrated the ability to do the job of coordinator, and needs only to be recognized for it. -FisherQueen (Talk) 18:05, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
  4. Wholehearted support. Glad we're finally making it official. Jeffpw 18:59, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
  5. Support. Has done outstanding work with the project already. It would certainly be in good hands. AgneCheese/Wine 19:04, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
  6. What could I possibly say but support? She's done so much excellent work. She's definitely the one for the post. — Emiellaiendiay 19:59, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
  7. Of course. Per nom. --AliceJMarkham 21:50, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
  8. Duh. —Mira 23:52, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
  9. Support. Per nom. -Hornandsoccer ContribsTalk 01:56, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
  10. [places pawprint] Haiduc 02:18, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
  11. So that she can keep up the good work :) CaveatLectorTalk 03:24, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
  12. Support. Thank you for all your work! --Allyn 03:28, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
  13. Support. At last, were becomeing a stronger group with in Wiki. --Kylehamilton 04:19, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
  14. Support. Of course. Excellent work! ParAmmon (cheers thanks a lot!) 06:24, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
  15. Support -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 06:49, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
  16. Support. I have no reason to object. --Clay 07:25, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
  17. Support. Of course. Burnley 07:48, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
  18. Support. nield 07:55, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
  19. Support. Ashley VH 09:22, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
  20. Support. Boyau 11:34, 12 February 2007 (UTC) go girl!!:)
  21. Support. Psicorps 13:36, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
  22. Full, unfettered support!. *Exeunt* Ganymead | Dialogue? 14:37, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
  23. Support as per nomination. Xdenizen 00:29, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
  24. Support!!! Ikasawak 08:49, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
  25. Support, as per nom. And what Davodd said. — OwenBlacker 21:18, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
  26. Support. Of course. GLGerman 03:13, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
  27. Absolutely. You've done an excellent job. PeaceNT 13:00, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
  28. Support Number301 23:50, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
  29. Support. thanks for stepping up and taking the lead Lisapollison 15:28, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
  30. Support WereWolf 02:45, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
  31. Support --Antanta 18:59, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
  32. Support wholeheartedly! Aleta 02:38, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Comments and questions

  1. Clarification The nomination implies that this project was started but lost momentum. As you can tell from its edit history, this project NEVER had momentum until recently. A handful of Wikipedia veterans who were too busy with other obligations created the bare bones of this project and the LGBT portal as stubs (or listed our names in support) in hope that someone (or a group of someones) would step up and take them over. They have. Great job all. Davodd 20:07, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.