Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Fawlty Towers
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hello, a couple things need to be done to improve this project. First of all the userbox that people can put if they are members needs to be categorized at WP:Userbox. Find the correct subcategory and add it, that way more people can join. Some categories need to have the <includeonly> </includeonly> and the templates should have one sperate page. There is no such category as WP:FAWLTY or wahtever it was so I have removed it. Please do not add such shortcut again in less one is created. Otherwise the project page looks good. It's the longest I've ever seen. ForestH2 t/c 19:56, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
- Please create subpages for a number of things. This project page is still a bit to long and it would better categorizing things. As for the steps from my previous note, I'm going to do them as nobody wants to do them. ForestH2 t/c
Contents |
[edit] NEW WIKIPROJECT
I just created WikiProject Monty Python. Please join and help me out! -PhattyFatt 03:22, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] TfD nomination of Template:Infobox Fawlty Towers
Template:Infobox Fawlty Towers has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. The JPStalk to me 16:28, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use images
It is against policy to use fair use images outside of article space. They cannot be used on project pages, in templates, or in userboxes. Each fair use image should have a detailed fair use rationale. The JPStalk to me 16:28, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] stub deletion notification
This is a notification to let you know that {{FawltyTowers-tv-stub}} and Cat:Fawlty Towers stubs are being proposed for deletion. Please voice your opinion in the discussion here. ~ Amalas rawr =^_^= 18:11, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Project Directory
Hello. The WikiProject Council is currently in the process of developing a master directory of the existing WikiProjects to replace and update the existing Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory. These WikiProjects are of vital importance in helping wikipedia achieve its goal of becoming truly encyclopedic. Please review the following pages:
- User:Badbilltucker/Culture Directory,
- User:Badbilltucker/Culture Directory 2,
- User:Badbilltucker/Philosophy and religion Directory,
- User:Badbilltucker/Sports Directory,
- User:Badbilltucker/Geographical Directory,
- User:Badbilltucker/Geographical Directory/United States, (note: This page will be retitled to more accurately reflect its contents)
- User:Badbilltucker/History and society directory, and
- User:Badbilltucker/Science directory
and make any changes to the entries for your project that you see fit. There is also a directory of portals, at User:B2T2/Portal, listing all the existing portals. Feel free to add any of them to the portals or comments section of your entries in the directory. The three columns regarding assessment, peer review, and collaboration are included in the directory for both the use of the projects themselves and for that of others. Having such departments will allow a project to more quickly and easily identify its most important articles and its articles in greatest need of improvement. If you have not already done so, please consider whether your project would benefit from having departments which deal in these matters. It is my hope to have the existing directory replaced by the updated and corrected version of the directory above by November 1. Please feel free to make any changes you see fit to the entries for your project before then. If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you. B2T2 21:55, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
- Sorry if you tried to update it before, and the corrections were gone. I have now put the new draft in the old directory pages, so the links should work better. My apologies for any confusion this may have caused you. B2T2 00:40, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia Day Awards
Hello, all. It was initially my hope to try to have this done as part of Esperanza's proposal for an appreciation week to end on Wikipedia Day, January 15. However, several people have once again proposed the entirety of Esperanza for deletion, so that might not work. It was the intention of the Appreciation Week proposal to set aside a given time when the various individuals who have made significant, valuable contributions to the encyclopedia would be recognized and honored. I believe that, with some effort, this could still be done. My proposal is to, with luck, try to organize the various WikiProjects and other entities of wikipedia to take part in a larger celebrartion of its contributors to take place in January, probably beginning January 15, 2007. I have created yet another new subpage for myself (a weakness of mine, I'm afraid) at User talk:Badbilltucker/Appreciation Week where I would greatly appreciate any indications from the members of this project as to whether and how they might be willing and/or able to assist in recognizing the contributions of our editors. Thank you for your attention. Badbilltucker 16:16, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] CFD notice
Removed cfdnotice, cfd has completed. --Kbdank71 15:15, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
-
- Please also note Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2007 February 20 for a review of the decision regarding Category:Actors by series. Tim! 08:06, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Episode coverage
The WikiProject Television episode coverage taskforce have recently been working on a review process for episode articles. There are a rash of articles about individual episodes which fail notability, and are unlikely to ever reach such requirements. Many contributors are unaware of the specific guidelines to assess notability in episode pages: Wikipedia:Television episodes. We have expanded these guidelines to make them more helpful and explanatory, and we invite you to read the guidelines, and make any comments on its talk page. After much discussion, we have created a proposed review process for dealing with problem articles. See: Wikipedia:Television article review process. We invite discussion of this process on its talk page. General comments about this whole process are welcome at the episode coverage taskforce talkpage. Thanks! Gwinva 10:13, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Centralized TV Episode Discussion
Over the past months, TV episodes have been redirected by (to name a couple) TTN, Eusebeus and others. No centralized discussion has taken place, so I'm asking everyone who has been involved in this issue to voice their opinions here in this centralized spot, be they pro or anti. Discussion is here [1]. --Maniwar (talk) 01:18, 16 January 2008 (UTC)