Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Chess/Assessment
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
Shortcut: WP:CHESS |
||||||||||||||||||||||
| Navigation Menu | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
| Chess Portal | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Contents |
[edit] Assessment chart/diagram update
How does the assessment info get updated? Is there some tool or thing to run to get it updated? ChessCreator (talk) 00:32, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
- I think it's run every few days automatically, although the intervals are somewhat irregular. (Or rather by some batch process that updates the assessments for all the participating wikiprojects.) You can find the log of past runs at Wikipedia:Version_1.0_Editorial_Team/Chess_articles_by_quality_log. BTW, if you can think of any pages or categories that would belong in Category:WikiProject Chess, feel free to add them. Quale (talk) 21:28, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Track of numbers
Seems the number of chess articles is growing fast recently. Something like 200 within the last two month. According to a note in WP:CHESS on Friday 5 October 2007, the WikiProject Chess reached 2,000 articles. Keeping a record here as might be interesting to look back at in the future.
Chess articles Importance
Top High Mid Low Total
Quality
FA 1 1 2
A 1 1
GA 1 1 1 3
B 23 29 46 30 128
Start 21 129 380 528 1058
Stub 2 56 250 872 1180
Assessed48 215 678 1431 2372
Total 48 215 678 1431 2372
ChessCreator (talk) 12:55, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
Update below:14 March 2008. 48 new articles in last 7 days.
Chess articles Importance
Top High Mid Low Total
Quality
FA 1 1 2
A 1 1
GA 1 1 2
B 24 29 46 30 129
Start 20 130 382 533 1065
Stub 2 56 253 910 1221
Assessed47 216 683 1474 2420
Total 47 216 683 1474 2420
ChessCreator (talk) 11:38, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
Update below:23 March 2008. 27 new articles in last 9 days.
Chess articles Importance
Top High Mid Low Total
Quality
FA 1 1 2
A 1 1
GA 1 1 2
B 24 31 46 30 131
Start 20 129 384 536 1069
Stub 2 55 253 932 1242
Assessed47 216 685 1499 2447
Total 47 216 685 1499 2447
Update below:2 April 2008. 6 new articles in last 10 days.
Chess articles Importance
Top High Mid Low Total
Quality
FA 1 1 2
A 1 1
GA 1 1 2
B 25 31 47 25 128
Start 21 129 385 536 1071
Stub 47 260 942 1249
Assessed47 208 694 1504 2453
Total 47 208 694 1504 2453
ChessCreator (talk) 11:33, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Update below:7 April 2008. 13 new articles in last 5 days.
Chess articles Importance
Top High Mid Low Total
Quality
FA 1 1 2
A 1 1
GA 1 1 2
B 25 31 48 25 129
Start 21 125 393 538 1077
Stub 43 266 946 1255
Assessed47 200 709 1510 2466
Total 47 200 709 1510 2466
ChessCreator (talk) 13:56, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
Update below:18 April 2008. 40 new articles in last 11 days.
Chess articles Importance
Top High Mid Low None Total
Quality
FA 1 1 2
A 1 1
GA 1 1 2
B 26 30 44 26 126
Start 20 124 385 539 1 1069
Stub 44 266 969 1 1280
List 4 9 13 26
Assessed47 203 706 1548 2 2506
Total 47 203 706 1548 2 2506
SunCreator (talk) 00:38, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
Update below:20 April 2008. 12 new articles in 2 days.
Chess articles Importance
Top High Mid Low Total
Quality
FA 1 1 2
A 1 1
GA 1 1 2
B 27 33 46 26 132
Start 19 119 386 540 1064
Stub 43 267 981 1291
List 1 3 8 14 26
Assessed48 199 709 1562 2518
Total 48 199 709 1562 2518
SunCreator (talk) 01:43, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
Update below:23 April 2008. 9 new articles and many re-assessments.
Chess articles Importance
Top High Mid Low Total
Quality
FA 1 1 2
A 1 1
GA 1 1 2
B 42 59 57 14 172
Start 3 111 429 551 1094
Stub 25 214 991 1230
List 1 3 8 14 26
Assessed47 199 710 1571 2527
Total 47 199 710 1571 2527
SunCreator (talk) 00:43, 23 April 2008 (UTC) Update below:4 May 2008. 14 new articles and many re-assessments.
Chess articles Importance
Top High Mid Low Total
Quality
FA 1 1 2
A 2 2
GA 1 1 2
B 40 97 69 14 220
Start 4 81 435 560 1080
Stub 3 216 989 1208
List 2 3 9 12 26
Assessed 47 185 732 1576 2540
Unassessed 1 1
Total 47 185 732 1577 2541
SunCreator (talk) 12:20, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Top Importance?
The Top importance of these articles seem questionable to me. Looking at conversion to other languages it appears some others agree.
Suggested Top articles that are currently High
ChessCreator (talk) 14:36, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
Most adjustments above made. Aron Nimzowitsch left as high. Much cross checking to similar topics and page views (see below) Stalemate and En passant changed to Top. Pending cross-checking High and Mid. Adjournment, Chess prodigy, Knight's tour, Comparing top chess players throughout history to High. ChessCreator (talk) 19:35, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Pages views
Using http://stats.grok.se List contains all Top importance, most Highs and a many mids. Number is approx. average per day.
Note, if the page is arrived at via a re-direct then that redirect view is not counted.
Page views moved to column Daily Traffic in Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Chess/Assessment/20080427
[edit] Chess Openings by page views
Added obvious re-direct names to total, i.e Sicilian Defense + Sicilian Defence added together.
Rank, Page views(average per day), Opening name, Assessment Class
- 1000 Chess opening Top
- 560 Sicilian Defence/se High
- 330 Ruy Lopez High
- 275 List of chess openings High
- 184 King/'s Gambit High
- 170 French Defence/se High
- 160 Open Game High
- 150 Scholar's mate High
- 137 Fool's mate High
- 135 Caro-Kann Defence High
- 128 English Opening High
- 125 Queen's Gambit Declined High
- 120 King's Indian Attack Mid
- 115 King's Indian Defence High
- 101 Alekhine/'s Defence/se Mid
- 100 Nimzo-Indian Defence High
- 95 Réti Opening High
- 82 Indian Defence High
- 80 Dutch Defence Mid
- 79 Queen's Gambit Accepted Mid
- 77 Two Knights Defense High
- 73 Scandinavian Defense Mid
- 73 Slav Defense High
- 71 Latvian Gambit Mid
- 70 Scotch Game Mid
- 70 Queen's Gambit Accepted Mid
- 70 Pirc Defence High
- 66 Sicilian Defence, Najdorf Variation Mid
- 66 Benoni Defense Mid
- 65 Closed Game High
- 62 Grünfeld Defence High
- 60 Irregular chess opening Low
- 60 King's Pawn Game High
- 55 Petrov's Defence Mid
- 53 Stonewall Attack Low
- 51 Grob's Attack Mid
- 50 Bird's Opening Mid
- 50 Giuoco Piano High
- 50 Evans Gambit High
- 48 Modern Defense Mid
- 48 Queen's Pawn Game High
- 48 Queen's Indian Defense High
- 46 Budapest Defence Mid
- 45 Danish Gambit Mid
- 40 Vienna Game Mid
- 40 Sokolsky Opening Mid
- 40 Four Knights Game Mid
- 40 Albin Countergambit Mid
- 40 Fried Liver Attack Low
- 39 Philidor Defence Mid
- 39 Parham Attack Low
- 38 Italian Game Mid
- 38 Colle System Mid
- 35 List of chess gambits Mid
- 35 Catalan Opening Mid
- 35 Benko Gambit Mid
- 35 Hippopotamus Defence Low
- 34 Semi-Open Game High
- 32 Semi-Slav Defense Mid
- 32 Hedgehog_(chess) Low
- 31 Anderssen's Opening Low
- 30 Bishop's Opening Mid
- 30 Blackmar-Diemer Gambit Low
- 30 Benko's Opening Low
- 29 Larsen's Opening Low
- 28 Smith-Morra Gambit Mid
- 28 Van 't Kruijs Opening Low
- 28 Napoleon Opening Low
- 28 List of chess openings named after places Low
- 26 Lasker Trap Low
- 26 Elephant Trap Low
- 25 Barnes Opening Low
- 25 Flank opening High
- 24 Sicilian Defence, Dragon Variation Mid
- 24 Ponziani Opening Mid
- 23 Elephant Gambit Low
- 23 Dunst Opening Low
- 22 Center Game Mid
- 22 Mieses Opening Low
- 21 Poisoned Pawn Variation Low
- 21 Amar Opening Low
- 20 Sicilian Defence, Scheveningen Variation Mid
- 20 Nimzowitsch Defence Mid
- 20 Maróczy Bind Mid
- 20 Chigorin Defense Mid
- 20 Bogo-Indian Defence Mid
- 20 Symmetrical Defense Low
- 20 Blackburne Shilling Gambit Low
- 20 Semi-Closed Game High
- 19 Noah's Ark Trap Low
- 19 Marshall Defense Low
- 19 Desprez Opening Low
- 19 Modern Chess Openings High
- 18 Ware Opening Low
- 18 Saragossa Opening Low
- 17 Tarrasch Defense Mid
- 17 Torre Attack Low
- 16 St. George Defence Low
- 16 Sicilian Defence, Alapin Variation Low
- 15 Richter-Veresov Attack Low
- 15 Fischer Defense Low
- 15 Clemenz Opening Low
- 15 Légal Trap High
- 14 Sicilian Defence, Accelerated Dragon Low
- 14 Monkey's Bum Low
- 14 London System Low
- 14 Durkin Opening Low
- 14 Baltic Defense Low
- 13 Ruy Lopez, Exchange Variation Mid
- 13 Wing Gambit Low
- 13 Englund Gambit Low
- 12 King's Indian Defence, Four Pawns Attack Mid
- 12 Staunton Gambit Low
- 12 Sicilian, Dragon, Yugoslav attack, 9.Bc4 Low
- 12 Portuguese Opening Low
- 12 Corn Stalk Defense Low
- 12 Cambridge Springs Defense Low
- 11 Owen's Defense Low
- 10 Opening book Mid
- 10 Monticelli Trap Low
- 10 Magnus Smith Trap Low
- 10 Lopez Opening Low
- 10 East Indian Defence Low
- 10 Boungcloud Attack Low
- 10 Black Knights' Tango Low
- 9 Old Indian Defense Mid
- 9 Damiano Defence Mid
- 9 Kingston Defence Low
- 9 Alapin's Opening Low
- 8 Siberian Trap Low
- 8 Rousseau Gambit Low
- 8 Lemming Defense Low
- 8 Italian Gambit Low
- 8 Halosar Trap Low
- 8 Greco Defence Low
- 8 Fred Defence Low
- 8 Frankenstein-Dracula Variation Low
- 8 English Defense Low
- 8 Adams Defense Low
- 7 Polish Defense Low
- 6 Trompowsky Attack Low
- 6 Tortoise Opening Low
- 6 Rubinstein Trap Low
- 6 Queen's Knight Defense Low
- 6 Neo-Indian Attack Low
- 6 Mortimer Trap Low
- 6 Falkbeer Countergambit Low
- 5 Würzburger Trap Low
- 5 Steinitz Variation Low
- 5 Marshall Trap Low
- 5 Marshall Gambit Low
- 5 Konstantinopolsky Opening Low
- 5 King's Knight Opening Low
- 5 Keres Defence Low
- 5 Carr Defense Low
- 5 Câmara Defense Low
- 4 Wade Defence Low
- 4 Rice Gambit Low
- 4 Müller-Schulze Gambit Low
- 4 Irish Gambit Low
- 4 Inverted Hungarian Opening Low
- 4 Hungarian Defense Low
- 3 Three Knights Opening Mid
- 3 Four Pawns Attack Low
- 3 Exchange variation Low
- 3 Chekhover Sicilian Low
- 3 Balogh Defense Low
ChessCreator (talk) 11:34, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
- I changed Sicilian Defense to Sician Defence in the articles using AWB, so that should cut out the redirects. Bubba73 (talk), 03:52, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Project tag
I just saw the project tag for the Military History project. For instance, go to Talk:Battle of Bloody Marsh, down to the Military Project box, and click on "show". It gives five criteria for being a B class article, and whether or not they have been met. I'm not asking anyone to do this for our project, since a few people have put in such a large amount of work already. But it is nice! Bubba73 (talk), 15:40, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
- If you go here you can find all articles according to number of references, so you can find those with no references or few references according to the amount of content. I don't think adding extra info in the assessment template would be productive. It would take a quite a bit of time to assess articles for something like grammar and it would soon get out of date. I think any sort of specific cleanup type work is best written about on the talk page. What way others see the issue and it can be commented on or marked accordingly when done. SunCreator (talk) 23:24, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
-
- I know it would take a lot of time, I just think it would be nice. But I do like the way they rate them on five criteria rather than counting paragraphs, etc. BTW, I used AWB to change several redirects so some of the traffic figures on that page will be more accurate now. Bubba73 (talk), 23:59, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
- I'm not sure the AWB changes where correct it seems to have changed the displayed words on some articles from America to English or vise versa spelling. I don't think that was the intention of the change and might be worth checking over. SunCreator (talk) 21:31, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
- I know it would take a lot of time, I just think it would be nice. But I do like the way they rate them on five criteria rather than counting paragraphs, etc. BTW, I used AWB to change several redirects so some of the traffic figures on that page will be more accurate now. Bubba73 (talk), 23:59, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
