Wikipedia:WikipediaWeekly/Episode43

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Episode 43: The Future of Wikipedia
Released: March 27, 2008


Downloads

All episodes, including options to automatically subscribe via RSS or iTunes, are at wikipedia weekly.com.

MP3 and OGG versions are available for all episodes and comments can be left at the episode's page


Participants:


This is Wikipedia Weekly... episode 43 for the week of March 10, 2008.

[edit] News

  • Call for new voices on the podcast
  • NotTheWikipediaWeekly
  • To our listeners Wikipedia Weekly is an independent, community audiocast, and is not affiliated with the Wikimedia Foundation. The contents of this page are that of their authors alone.
  • Wikipedia Review tests our independence
    • Liam replies to criticism of the show with Angela Beesley
  • Latest with Jimmy, Valleywag, Danny, board, but discussed in a professional/balanced way, and not a scandalsheet
    • Valleywag publishes chat from Marsden and Wales
    • Wales comes out with on-wiki User page statement
    • Marsden puts attire on eBay for sale
    • More Valleywag stories related to leaked chat
    • Bloggers (namely Danny) blog about WMF finances and Jimmy's expenditures
    • Sue Gardner responds on blog of Danny's blog (allswool.blogspot.com)
    • Canadian Press picks up on this story, Australian shortly after
    • Associated Press picks up
    • CNET Live appearance by Sue Gardner [1]
  • Debate from last week about 20 million articles. Lots of juicy discussion on that, and most ppl siding with Liam and not me. :) But the numbers don't lie. Let's talk about stats we have now, and hopefully stats to come from Erik Zachte now that we finally have Feb 2008 dumps (yeah!)
  • Wiki industry -- Wikileaks, forgot to talk about that. Kaltura, which came out when we were on hiatus, and as brought up by Brianna's good blog post about this.
  • Alexandria update
    • The board has asked me to review the Wikimania security issues. I've asked Mike to commission a routine conference site assessment from a professional firm, with a special focus on issues facing LGBT participants, and within the context of us being an organization that's highly-visible and not uncontroversial (e.g., Muhammad pictures, etc.). We'll ask for an overall threat assessment, as well as a set of recommendations on how to best reduce risk. I'll report progress to the board in April. - Sue Gardner
  • Rfb and 90%

[edit] Top 100

Preceded by
Episode 42 The Question of Muhammad, the Wiki,and Everything		 Episode 43 The Future of Wikipedia Succeeded by
Episode 44 Stable Perversions