Wikipedia:WikiProject Webcomics/Peer review/Questionable Content/Archive1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Questionable Content
The kind of comments I want (and/or contributions if possible) are what the article needs to be bumped up in quality. Probably to at least A-class. At this point, the article is very good (in my opinion), but it still could use some work regardless. This is one of the better articles in Project Webcomics, but I still think that maybe it could get to GA status at one point. :) ~ EdBoy[c] 00:24, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- Too many external links
- References aren't formatted properly, see {{cite web}}
- References go after a full stop with no space.
- Article is filled with external links, change them to references or remove.
- Another paragraph for the lead will be required for GA or A status
- Whole article is too listy, with characters and the blackboard thing.
- make it so the website in the infobox doesn't show the http://
A lot of work to be done, goodluck M3tal H3ad 10:22, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
The one thing you absolutely need is a well-referenced reception section a la Megatokyo or other FAs. That means doing research, finding out what others have said about QC, and generally turning your attention away from simply describing the comic towards giving it its due worth. Nifboy 07:37, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- I don't know what I could do about that, but maybe others could help. ~ EdBoy[c] 02:33, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
- "Comedy webcomic" is redundant, or at least it sounds redundant.
- Delete the Comments on the blackboard list, keep the prose. The list is trivia, not encyclopedic.
- Delete the Jeph Jacques' Guest Comics list or move it to the Jeph Jacques article.
- Try to make the intro a little longer.
Kaldari 06:21, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
