Wikipedia:WikiProject Update Watch
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
WikiProject Update Watch dedicates to verify and assist Wikipedia's articles in:
Many editors and WikiProjects are consistently looking after the good quality and suitable content of the many articles existing in Wikipedia, making a wonderful work. However, once an article has been edited to its best, time, new facts and discoveries may turn the content inaccurate and in some few cases totally obsolete. New articles may as well show lack of information regarding important updates or be plainly based in outdated knowledge. A good encyclopedic article should be updated and relying on the latest information available, this is what WikiProject Update Watch editors are trying to help with. |
||
|
We encourage all editors to:
|
||
|
All articles may fall under the scope WikiProject Update Watch. At all times is endorsed understanding, support and cooperation with an open attitude. Participants of more than one Project may find useful to obtain a recognition of cooperation between projects shown by inclusion in the {{Cooperation Shell Banner}} at the project's page. The cooperation banner of WikiProject Update Watch is {{WikiProject Update Watch CoopBanner}} Updated information sometimes may create debate, at all times NPOV must be reminded and kept. When finding situations in which an article is supported by a WikiProject or editors who seem to be acting with lack of neutrality or actively promoting interests, avoid unnecessary debate, request the opinion of other participants of WP:UPDATE. You may also follow available Wikipedia:Mediation policies. See also Accuracy dispute. While Wikipedia already has a category for articles in need of updating, it basically refers and deals with articles chronologically outdated, see Updating Information. The category of articles with obsolete information refers to articles in dispute following an editor's report of factual inaccuracy based on outdated references. Editors acting on behalf of WikiProject Update Watch, may of course tag articles for any of the above reasons, but what we are trying to identify, are articles not covered by other categories, articles which are missing newly available information for adding content and accuracy i.e. and article about vaccination methods which fails to include "pressure powder injections". Also we identify articles which have an outdated content because of historical or other facts which have turned that subject obsolete, i.e. "Rhodesian economy" or articles which contain information or sources outdated at the light of new discoveries or newly accepted knowledge which can be adequately sourced i.e. an article describing hydrogen-cell driven engines referencing the dangers of manipulation (which are outdated by new procedures). The occasional overlapping of categories, if any, do not constitute redundancy but complementation and if so occurs it will only help Wikipedia 's reliability. |
||
|
Once you have located an article with outdated content or sources, or missing newly available information, please follow these steps: 1. Place the tag {{Update}} at the top of the article or at the outdated section. These will yield :
{{Out of date}} 2. Tag the outdated content inline with {{Updateneed}} which will show: [update needed] 3. At the article's talk page place {{UpdateWatch}} , it will yield:
|
||||
|
|
||||
WikiProject Council would like to inform all Wikipedians that it may be advantageous to:
|