Wikipedia:WikiProject UK Waterways/Assessment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the assessment page for WikiProject UK Waterways.

UK Waterways
articles
Importance
Top High Mid Low Total
Quality
Featured article FA 1 1
Good article GA 1 2 1 4
B 11 18 50 9 88
Start 6 24 101 94 225
Stub 1 10 66 138 215
Assessed 18 53 220 242 533
Total 18 53 220 242 533

Contents

[edit] Quality scale

Article progress grading scheme [  v  d  e  ]
Label Criteria Reader's experience Editor's experience Example
Featured article FA
{{FA-Class}}
Reserved exclusively for articles that have received "Featured article" status, and meet the current criteria for featured articles. Definitive. Outstanding, thorough article; a great source for encyclopedic information. No further additions are necessary unless new published information has come to light, but further improvements to the text are often possible. Tourette Syndrome (as of July 2007)
Featured list FL
{{FL-Class}}
Reserved exclusively for articles that have received "Featured lists" status, and meet the current criteria for featured lists. Definitive. Outstanding, thorough list; a great source for encyclopedic information. No further additions are necessary unless new published information has come to light, but further improvements to the text are often possible. FBI Ten Most Wanted Fugitives (as of January 2008)
A
{{A-Class}}
Provides a well-written, reasonably clear and complete description of the topic, as described in How to write a great article. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, with a well-written introduction and an appropriate series of headings to break up the content. It should have sufficient external literature references, preferably from reliable, third-party published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy (peer-reviewed where appropriate). Should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. At the stage where it could at least be considered for featured article status, corresponds to the "Wikipedia 1.0" standard. Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject matter would typically find nothing wanting. May miss a few relevant points. Minor edits and adjustments would improve the article, particularly if brought to bear by a subject-matter expert. In particular, issues of breadth, completeness, and balance may need work. Peer-review would be helpful at this stage. Durian (as of March 2007)
Good article GA
{{GA-Class}}
The article has passed through the Good article nomination process and been granted GA status, meeting the good article standards. This should be used for articles that still need some work to reach featured article standards, but that are otherwise acceptable. Good articles that may succeed in FAC should be considered A-Class articles, but having completed the Good article designation process is not a requirement for A-Class. Useful to nearly all readers. A good treatment of the subject. No obvious problems, gaps, or excessive information. Adequate for most purposes, but other encyclopedias could do a better job. Some editing will clearly be helpful, but not necessary for a good reader experience. If the article is not already fully wikified, now is the time. International Space Station (as of February 2007)
B
{{B-Class}}
Commonly the highest article grade that is assigned outside a more formal review process. Has several of the elements described in "start", usually a majority of the material needed for a comprehensive article. Nonetheless, it has some gaps or missing elements or references, needs editing for language usage or clarity, balance of content, or contains other policy problems such as copyright, Neutral Point Of View (NPOV) or No Original Research (NOR). With NPOV a well written B-class may correspond to the "Wikipedia 0.5" or "usable" standard. Articles that are close to GA status but don't meet the Good article criteria should be B- or Start-class articles. Useful to many, but not all, readers. A casual reader flipping through articles would feel that they generally understood the topic, but a serious student or researcher trying to use the material would have trouble doing so, or would risk error in derivative work. Considerable editing is still needed, including filling in some important gaps or correcting significant policy errors. Articles for which cleanup is needed will typically have this designation to start with. Jammu and Kashmir (as of October 2007) has a lot of helpful material but needs more prose content and references.
Start
{{Start-Class}}
The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas, and may lack a key element. For example an article on Africa might cover the geography well, but be weak on history and culture. Has at least one serious element of gathered materials, including any one of the following:
  • a particularly useful picture or graphic
  • multiple links that help explain or illustrate the topic
  • a subheading that fully treats an element of the topic
  • multiple subheadings that indicate material that could be added to complete the article
Useful to some, provides a moderate amount of information, but many readers will need to find additional sources of information. The article clearly needs to be expanded. Substantial/major editing is needed, most material for a complete article needs to be added. This article still needs to be completed, so an article cleanup tag is inappropriate at this stage. Real analysis (as of November 2006)
Stub
{{Stub-Class}}
The article is either a very short article or a rough collection of information that will need much work to bring it to A-Class level. It is usually very short, but can be of any length if the material is irrelevant or incomprehensible. Possibly useful to someone who has no idea what the term meant. May be useless to a reader only passingly familiar with the term. At best a brief, informed dictionary definition. Any editing or additional material can be helpful. Coffee table book (as of July 2005)


[edit] Importance scale

For now, this will use the Wikipedia version 0.5 importance scale.

Need: The article's priority or importance, regardless of its quality

Top Subject is a must-have for a print encyclopaedia
High Subject contributes a depth of knowledge
Mid Subject fills in more minor details
Low The subject is mainly of specialist interest
None Unassessed, importance still to be determined

Within the UKW project, this equates to;

Importance chart for waterways articles
Canals/Rivers Tunnels/Aqueducts Locks/Lifts Other Structures Organisations People Terminology
Top
  • Heavily used "backbone" parts of the canal network (T+M, SU, GU)
  • Principal Rivers (Thames, Severn)

 

  • Major Navigation Authorities (BW, EA)
  • National, broad based organisations (IWA)
  • Terms relating to very basic and well known items (narrowboat, lock)
High
  • Major canalside developments (Gas St)
  • Significant cruising destinations (Little Venice, Bugsworth)
  • Very well known junctions (Old Turn, Autherley)
  • Lesser known engineers with significant achievement (Edwin Clark)
  • More technical terms that are less likely to be of interest to the casual reader (winding, gongoozler)
Mid
  • Other navigable and connected waterways
  • Longer (>5 miles) disconnected and navigable waterways
  • Very short (under 5 miles) navigable but disconnected canals which see appreciable traffic
  • Less popular cruising rings (South, North Pennine)
  • Disused canals that are likely to re-open within 10 years
  • Disused canals that are historically significant or pioneering
  • New waterways that are being actively pursued (Higher Avon, Bedford-MK link)
  • Most other tunnels and aqueducts
  • Particularly noteworthy locks (Richmond)
  • Reservoirs that are of some particular note (Rudyard because it was once mooted that navigation would be routed that way)
  • Noteworthy canalside buildings (Smethwick coal chutes)
  • Most junctions
  • Navigation authorities responsible for a single canal (Basingstoke Canal Authority)
  • Organisations of more than just very local but less than broad significance (FM&C, RBOA)
  • People of more than just very local significance (Outram)
  • Technical terms (sluice, bed valve)
Low
  • Derelict canals that will still be derelict in 10 years, and are not of special historical significance
  • Very short (under 5 miles) navigable but disconnected canals which see very little traffic
  • Rings that are named, but rarely form part of people's cruising plans (Outer Pennine)
  • Structures on waterways that are rated as low importance
  • Underbridge
  • Most articles about individual locks
  • Most reservoirs
  • Obscure or little known canal junctions
  • Defunct minor navigation authorities
  • Organisations of minor or local significance (local canal society)
  • People of minor or local significance
  • Terms that are highly specialised
  • Terms that are of limited geographical application

[edit] Log

Archive This is a log of operations by a bot. The contents of this page are unlikely to need human editing. In particular, links should not be disambiguated as this is a historical record.


[edit] June 11, 2008

(No changes today)

[edit] June 8, 2008

(No changes today)

[edit] June 4, 2008

  • River Severn reassessed from A-Class (Top-Class) to B-Class (Top-Class)

[edit] June 1, 2008

[edit] May 28, 2008

[edit] May 25, 2008

[edit] May 21, 2008

(No changes today)

[edit] May 18, 2008

(No changes today)

[edit] May 14, 2008

(No changes today)

[edit] May 11, 2008

[edit] May 5, 2008

[edit] April 22, 2008

(No changes today)

[edit] April 15, 2008

(No changes today)

[edit] April 6, 2008

[edit] April 2, 2008

[edit] March 31, 2008

(No changes today)

[edit] March 27, 2008

(No changes today)

[edit] March 22, 2008

(No changes today)

[edit] March 19, 2008

(No changes today)

[edit] March 16, 2008

(No changes today)

[edit] March 11, 2008

  • Aberdare Canal reassessed from Stub-Class (Low-Class) to Start-Class (Low-Class)

[edit] March 4, 2008

(No changes today)

[edit] February 27, 2008

(No changes today)

[edit] February 25, 2008

(No changes today)

[edit] February 24, 2008

[edit] February 19, 2008

[edit] February 15, 2008

[edit] February 10, 2008

[edit] February 6, 2008

[edit] February 5, 2008

[edit] February 1, 2008

[edit] January 27, 2008

(No changes today)