Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court Cases/to do

Some articles need expansion more than others. These articles can be listed below. These articles should be listed even if the contributor who adds the article to the list is going to work on that article themselves; Wikipedia is all about collaboration and many Wikipedians involved with the Project working on an article at once is how great articles will be born. Anyone can add an article to this list (including users not involved with the project) and the person who adds it need not leave their name.

De-stub

• Sony Corp. v. Universal City Studios - The article is very relevant to fair use and copyright laws. It was started off very well, but has not received any attention since July, 2004 and is not looking great. This would be a good article for any contributors familiar with the Digital Millennium Copyright Act.
• Regents of the University of California v. Bakke - Quota system in college admissions.
• Boy Scouts of America v. Dale - Freedom of association.
• Feist v. Rural - There is a good amount of information currently. It just needs the proper organization.
• United States v. Shabani - Currently a very small stub.
• Connecticut General Life Insurance Company v. Johnson- Very, very small stub.
• Republican Party of Minnesota v. White - Basic stub of what case was about, needs information on the arguments, how each justice ruled, and a US Reports cite

Improve/Peer review

• Batson v. Kentucky - A very important case, especially in the Southern states. In its current state, an average reader probably would not understand what most of it means, especially with references to the term prima facie without giving its meaning. In much better shape now, but still needs work. See Talk:Batson v. Kentucky for details.
• Miller v. California - This is a landmark First Amendment case that is currently a simple stub without real substance. It needs work on just about every section except for "The Bench". Looks great after some generous contributions. All that's left is the "subsequent history" section.
• Texas v. Johnson - Flag burning, freedom of speech. Only a very brief description of a very important case. In much better shape now, but needs some other info and could use tweaking. See Talk:Texas v. Johnson for details.
• Wheaton v. Peters - PedanticallySpeaking created a great foundation for this article. Now it's time for the community to work together to make this article perfect and conform it to the standards set forth by this project.
• Hammer v. Dagenhart- This article is currently listed for cleanup. Please cleanup the article and removed the tag.

Intensive Care

• Roe v. Wade - This article is very POV, needs work on grammar, structure, Wikification corrections and a laundry list of other problems. Any work on it would be appreciated.

Merge

Create

• Commonwealth v. Dillon
• Diamond v. Chakrabarty
• Printz v. United States - (Formerly mistakenly at United States v. Printz). Case on the constitutionality of the Brady Act. The “article” right now is simply the text of the case, including syllabus. An actual article needs to be written (and the case needs to be moved to Wikisource).
• Stewart v. Abend