Wikipedia:WikiProject Turkey/Assessment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject Turkey
General information (edit · changes)
Departments
  • Assessment
Infoboxes
Other templates
Turkey work groups
Things you can do (edit)
Project's statistics

This list is generated automatically every night around 10 PM EST; view full worklist

Turkey
articles		 Importance
Top High Mid Low None Total
Quality
Featured article FA 4 3 4 1 12
Good article GA 2 12 1 15
B 9 52 224 58 6 349
Start 1 53 869 704 44 1671
Stub 54 564 2399 114 3131
List 3 46 60 47 156
Assessed 14 167 1719 3221 213 5334
Unassessed 2 174 176
Total 14 167 1719 3223 387 5510

Welcome to the assessment department of the WikiProject Turkey! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's articles related to Turkey. The article ratings are used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.

The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WPTR}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Turkey articles by quality and Category:Turkey articles by importance.

Contents

[edit] Frequently asked questions

How can I get my article rated? 
As a member of the WikiProject Turkey, you can do it yourself. If you're unsure, list it in the section for assessment requests below.
Who can assess articles? 
Any member of the WikiProject Turkey is free to add—or change—the rating of an article.
Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments? 
Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning.
Where can I get more comments about my article? 
Contact (to be determined) who will handle it or assign the issue to someone.
What if I don't agree with a rating? 
Relist it as a request or contact (to be determined) who will handle it or assign the issue to someone.
Aren't the ratings subjective? 
Yes, they are (see, in particular, the disclaimers on the importance scale), but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!

If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department, or to contact (to be determined) directly.

[edit] Instructions

[edit] Quality assessments

An article's assessment is generated from the class and importance parameters in the {{WPTR}} project banner on its talk page (see the project banner instructions for more details on the exact syntax):

{{WPTR| ... | class=??? | ...}}
Featured article FA
A
Good article GA
B
Start
Stub
Needed
???

The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article:


Template
Disambig
Category
Image
List
NA

For pages that are not articles, the following values can also be used for the class parameter:

Articles for which a valid class is not provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Turkey articles. The class should be assigned according to the quality scale below.

[edit] Importance assessments

The following values may be used for the importance parameter:


Top
High
Mid
Low

The parameter is not used if an article's class is set to NA, and may be omitted in those cases. The importance should be assigned according to the importance scale below.

[edit] Quality scale

For the quality scale please use the Category:Turkey articles by quality page.

[edit] Importance scale

For the Importance scale use the Category:Turkey articles by importance

The criteria used for rating article importance are not meant to be an absolute or canonical view of how significant the topic is. Rather, they attempt to gauge the probability of the average reader of Wikipedia needing to look up the topic (and thus the immediate need to have a suitably well-written article on it). Thus, subjects with greater popular notability may be rated higher than topics which are arguably more "important" but which are of interest primarily to students of military history. Importance does not equate to quality; a featured article could rate 'mid' on importance.

Note that general notability need not be from the perspective of editor demographics; generally notable topics should be rated similarly regardless of the country or region in which they hold said notability. Thus, topics which may seem obscure to a Western audience—but which are of high notability in other places—should still be highly rated.

  • The importance scale for the towns, provinces are determined by: High Importance: Capital and population higher than a million.
  • The importance scale for the biographies are determined by:
  • The importance scale for the current events are determined by:

[edit] Requesting an assessment

It is vital that people not take these assessments personally. It is understood that we all have different priorities and different opinions about what makes a perfect article. It is proposed that coordinator who performs a complete assessment on each page on that list every three months. If you contribute a lot of content to an article you may request an independent assessment.

For new articles please add this template

Placed on the articles talk page Generates
{{WPTR}}
WikiProject Turkey
Turkey Portal
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Turkey, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Turkey-related topics. Please visit the the participants page if you would like to get involved. Happy editing!
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
edit · history · watch · refresh To-do list for Wikipedia:WikiProject Turkey/Assessment:

No to-do list assigned; you can help us in improving the articles in the same category

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below. If you are interested in more extensive comments on an article, please use the peer review department instead. If you are adding articles below, please consider rating another article and remove it from the list after rating.

  1. Add articles here! Newest requests on TOP
  2. Topkapı Palace. Gryffindor 00:28, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
  3. Peace of Szeged - Still definitely needs work so I'm guessing either Start or B, but I'm a bit biased since I wrote it. If B, how far is it from GA? -Bbik 06:25, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
Languages