Wikipedia:WikiProject Tropical cyclones/Assessment/2004 Atlantic hurricane season

I point this one out since Eric wants it. I think it's a little lacking in that the storms section is poorly balanced (Bonnie is the third-most-detailed storm, for instance). Jdorje 03:12, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

It doesn't look as bad anymore. I would give it the A. Titoxd^{(?!? - help us)} 07:03, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

It looks good. All that's needed is inline sources. Hurricanehink 03:46, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

I've transferred the TCRs and other citations to Cite.php format, and the only thing to do is to add {{cite web}} to a few ones I left. I've also added a few {{fact}} tags for things that need a simple citation (or a link to another article). Titoxd^{(?!? - help us)} 04:39, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

Wow, nice work with that. Once the facts are found, then I'll support A class. Hurricanehink 15:26, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

I think it is a potential FA. Titoxd^{(?!? - help us)} 20:58, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

It appears that 2004 is going to be a repeat of 2005; most storms have articles. Before we push to FA, we should decide if all storms should have articles. If that's going to happen, a repeat of 2005, that is having a season summary and a List of 2004 storms article, could work. It worked for 2005, and seeing as that's an FA, what's the harm in repeating it? Hurricanehink (talk) 03:08, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

Now FA (though still work to be done here imo).--Nilfanion (talk) 19:05, 17 October 2006 (UTC)