Wikipedia:WikiProject Sussex/Assessment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to the assessment department of the WikiProject Sussex! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's Sussex related articles. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.

The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WikiProject Sussex}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Sussex-related articles by quality, which serves as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.

Contents 1 FAQ 2 Usage 3 Instructions 3.1 Quality assessments 3.2 Quality scale 3.3 Importance assessment 3.4 Importance scale 3.5 Requesting an assessment 4 Assessment log 4.1 June 11, 2008 4.2 June 8, 2008 4.3 June 4, 2008 4.4 June 1, 2008 4.5 May 28, 2008 4.6 May 25, 2008 4.7 May 21, 2008 4.8 May 18, 2008 4.9 May 14, 2008 4.10 May 11, 2008 4.11 May 5, 2008 4.12 May 4, 2008 4.13 April 26, 2008 4.14 April 22, 2008 4.15 April 15, 2008 4.16 April 13, 2008 4.17 April 9, 2008 4.18 April 6, 2008 4.19 April 2, 2008 4.20 March 31, 2008 4.21 March 27, 2008 4.22 March 22, 2008 4.23 March 19, 2008 4.24 March 16, 2008 4.25 March 11, 2008 4.26 March 4, 2008 4.27 February 27, 2008 4.28 February 25, 2008 4.29 February 19, 2008 4.30 February 14, 2008 4.31 February 10, 2008 4.32 February 6, 2008

[edit] FAQ

See also the general assessment FAQ.

1. What is the purpose of the article ratings?: The rating system allows the project to monitor the quality of articles in our subject areas, and to prioritize work on these articles. It is also utilized by the Wikipedia 1.0 program to prepare for static releases of Wikipedia content. Please note, however, that these ratings are primarily intended for the internal use of the project, and do not necessarily imply any official standing within Wikipedia as a who
2. How do I add an article to the WikiProject? : Just add {{WikiProject Sussex}} to the talk page; there's no need to do anything else.
3. Someone put a {{WikiProject Sussex}} template on an article, but it doesn't seem to be within the project's scope. What should I do? : Because of the large number of articles we deal with, we occasionally make mistakes and add tags to articles that shouldn't have them. If you notice one, feel free to remove the tag, and optionally leave a note on the talk page of this department (or directly with the person who tagged the article).
4. Who can assess articles? : Any member of the Sussex WikiProject is free to add—or change—the rating of an article. Editors who are not participants in this project are also welcome to assess articles, but should defer to consensus within the project in case of procedural disputes.
5. How do I rate an article? : Check the quality scale and select the level that best matches the state of the article; then, follow the instructions below to add the rating to the project banner on the article's talk page. Please note that some of the available levels have an associated formal review process; this is documented in the assessment scale.
6. Can I request that someone else rate an article? : Of course; to do so, please list it in the assessment requests section.
7. Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments? : Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning.
8. What if I don't agree with a rating? : You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again. Please note that some of the available levels have an associated formal review process; this is documented in the assessment scale.
9. Aren't the ratings subjective? : Yes, they are somewhat subjective, but it's the best system we've been able to devise. If you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!
10. What if I have a question not listed here? : If your question concerns the article assessment process specifically, please refer to the discussion page for this department; for any other issues, you can go to the main project discussion page directly.

[edit] Usage

The {{WikiProject Sussex}} project banner template should be added (not subst:ed) to the talk page of every article within the scope of the project. While the template does not require any additional parameters, it has a number of optional ones that add various extra features to the banner. The full syntax is as follows:

{{WikiProject Sussex
|class=
|importance=
|unref=
|needs-photo=yes
|nested=yes
}}

class is for the quality of the article

importance is for the importance for researchers of Sussex

unref=yes if references needed

needs-photo=yes if the article lacks a photograph.

nested=yes if used in conjunction with {{WikiProjectBannerShell}} on a multiple project.

any of the above parameters can be left blank

Comments should be added on the linked Talk sub page created by the template.

[edit] Instructions

[edit] Quality assessments

An article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{WikiProject Sussex}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject Sussex| ... | class=??? | ...}}

FA

A

GA

B

Start

Stub

Needed

The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article:

• FA (adds articles to Category:FA-Class Sussex-related articles)
• A (adds articles to Category:A-Class Sussex-related articles)
• GA (adds articles to Category:GA-Class Sussex-related articles)
• B (adds articles to Category:B-Class Sussex-related articles)
• Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class Sussex-related articles)
• Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class Sussex-related articles)
• Needed (for articles that do not yet exist but have been identified as subjects that should be covered; adds articles to Category:Needed-Class Sussex-related articles)

Template

Disambig

Category

Image

List

NA

For pages that are not articles, the following values can also be used for the class parameter:

• Template (for templates; adds pages to Category:Template-Class Sussex-related articles)
• Dab or Disambig (for disambiguation pages; add pages to Category:Disambig-Class Sussex-related articles)
• Cat or Category (for categories; adds pages to Category:Category-Class Sussex-related articles)
• Img or Image (for images and other media; adds pages to Category:Image-Class Sussex-related articles)
• List (for articles that are lists made up primarily of links to other pages; adds pages to Category:List-Class Sussex-related articles)
• NA (for any other pages where assessment is unnecessary; adds pages to Category:Non-article Sussex-related pages)

Articles for which a valid class is not provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Sussex-related articles. The class should be assigned according to the quality scale below.

After assessing an article's quality, comments on the assessment can be added either to the article's talk page or to the /Comments subpage which will appear as a link next to the assessment. Adding comments will add the article to Category:Sussex-related articles with comments. Comments that are added to the /Comments subpages will be transcluded onto the automatically generated work list pages in the Comments column.

[edit] Quality scale

Article progress grading scheme [  v • d • e  ]

Label	Criteria	Reader's experience	Editor's experience	Example
FA {{FA-Class}}	Reserved exclusively for articles that have received "Featured article" status, and meet the current criteria for featured articles.	Definitive. Outstanding, thorough article; a great source for encyclopedic information.	No further additions are necessary unless new published information has come to light, but further improvements to the text are often possible.	Tourette Syndrome (as of July 2007)
FL {{FL-Class}}	Reserved exclusively for articles that have received "Featured lists" status, and meet the current criteria for featured lists.	Definitive. Outstanding, thorough list; a great source for encyclopedic information.	No further additions are necessary unless new published information has come to light, but further improvements to the text are often possible.	FBI Ten Most Wanted Fugitives (as of January 2008)
A {{A-Class}}	Provides a well-written, reasonably clear and complete description of the topic, as described in How to write a great article. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, with a well-written introduction and an appropriate series of headings to break up the content. It should have sufficient external literature references, preferably from reliable, third-party published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy (peer-reviewed where appropriate). Should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. At the stage where it could at least be considered for featured article status, corresponds to the "Wikipedia 1.0" standard.	Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject matter would typically find nothing wanting. May miss a few relevant points.	Minor edits and adjustments would improve the article, particularly if brought to bear by a subject-matter expert. In particular, issues of breadth, completeness, and balance may need work. Peer-review would be helpful at this stage.	Durian (as of March 2007)
GA {{GA-Class}}	The article has passed through the Good article nomination process and been granted GA status, meeting the good article standards. This should be used for articles that still need some work to reach featured article standards, but that are otherwise acceptable. Good articles that may succeed in FAC should be considered A-Class articles, but having completed the Good article designation process is not a requirement for A-Class.	Useful to nearly all readers. A good treatment of the subject. No obvious problems, gaps, or excessive information. Adequate for most purposes, but other encyclopedias could do a better job.	Some editing will clearly be helpful, but not necessary for a good reader experience. If the article is not already fully wikified, now is the time.	International Space Station (as of February 2007)
B {{B-Class}}	Commonly the highest article grade that is assigned outside a more formal review process. Has several of the elements described in "start", usually a majority of the material needed for a comprehensive article. Nonetheless, it has some gaps or missing elements or references, needs editing for language usage or clarity, balance of content, or contains other policy problems such as copyright, Neutral Point Of View (NPOV) or No Original Research (NOR). With NPOV a well written B-class may correspond to the "Wikipedia 0.5" or "usable" standard. Articles that are close to GA status but don't meet the Good article criteria should be B- or Start-class articles.	Useful to many, but not all, readers. A casual reader flipping through articles would feel that they generally understood the topic, but a serious student or researcher trying to use the material would have trouble doing so, or would risk error in derivative work.	Considerable editing is still needed, including filling in some important gaps or correcting significant policy errors. Articles for which cleanup is needed will typically have this designation to start with.	Jammu and Kashmir (as of October 2007) has a lot of helpful material but needs more prose content and references.
Start {{Start-Class}}	The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas, and may lack a key element. For example an article on Africa might cover the geography well, but be weak on history and culture. Has at least one serious element of gathered materials, including any one of the following: a particularly useful picture or graphic multiple links that help explain or illustrate the topic a subheading that fully treats an element of the topic multiple subheadings that indicate material that could be added to complete the article	Useful to some, provides a moderate amount of information, but many readers will need to find additional sources of information. The article clearly needs to be expanded.	Substantial/major editing is needed, most material for a complete article needs to be added. This article still needs to be completed, so an article cleanup tag is inappropriate at this stage.	Real analysis (as of November 2006)
Stub {{Stub-Class}}	The article is either a very short article or a rough collection of information that will need much work to bring it to A-Class level. It is usually very short, but can be of any length if the material is irrelevant or incomprehensible.	Possibly useful to someone who has no idea what the term meant. May be useless to a reader only passingly familiar with the term. At best a brief, informed dictionary definition.	Any editing or additional material can be helpful.	Coffee table book (as of July 2005)

[edit] Importance assessment

An article's importance assessment is generated from the importance parameter in the {{WP:Sussex}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject Sussex| ... | importance=??? | ...}}

Top

High

Mid

Low

The following values may be used for importance assessments:

• Top - The article is about one of the core topics of Sussex. Adds articles to Category:Top-importance Sussex-related articles
• High - The article is about the infrastructure or the most well-known or culturally or historically significant aspects of Sussex. Adds articles to Category:High-importance Sussex-related articles
• Mid - The article is about a topic within Sussex that may or may not be commonly known outside the Sussex area. Adds articles to Category:Mid-importance Sussex-related articles
• Low - The article is about a topic that is highly specialized within Sussex and is not generally common knowledge outside the Sussex area. Adds articles to Category:Low-importance Sussex-related articles

All articles that lack an importance rating are categorized in Category:Unknown-importance Sussex-related articles.

[edit] Importance scale

Label	Criteria	Reader's experience	Editor's experience	Example
Top	The article is one of the core topics of Sussex.	A reader who is not involved in Sussex will have high familiarity with the subject matter and should be able to relate to the topic easily.	Articles in this importance range are written in mostly generic terms, leaving technical terms and descriptions for more specialized pages.	Sussex
High	The article covers a topic that is vital to understanding the history or technology, etc of Sussex.	Most readers will at least be familiar with the topic being discussed.	These articles describe the basics beyond the core topics about Sussex and the more significant historical events in Sussex history. Articles about the most basic topics in Sussex like towns and cities and the most historically and culturally significant topics are included in this level. Some technical terms can be used within articles in this range, but where they are used, they should be explained or at least link to articles that discuss the terms in more detail.	Brighton
Mid	The article covers a topic that has a strong but not vital role in the history or technology of Sussex.	Many readers will be familiar with the topic being discussed, but a larger majority of readers may have only cursory knowledge of the overall subject.	Articles at this level will cover subjects that are well known but not necessarily vital to understand Sussex. Due to the topics covered at this level, Mid-importance articles will generally have more technical terms used in the article text.	Fishbourne Roman Palace
Low	The article is not required knowledge for a broad understanding of Sussex.	Few readers outside the local area of the article's topic may be familiar with the subject matter. It is likely that the reader does not know anything at all about the subject before reading the article.	Articles at this range of importance will often delve into the minutiae of Sussex, using technical terms (and defining them) as needed. Topics included at this level include small villages, local railway stations, that otherwise had no significant impact on the rest of Sussex.	Ifield railway station

[edit] Requesting an assessment

This is a list of recent requests. To add to this list please click here.

• I am not a member of this project and do not wish to be, but would ask that the article Wealden iron industry be reassessed and rerated following its recent revision. Peterkingiron 14:46, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

Done MortimerCat (talk) 21:21, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

• Ashurst Wood - I've done a lot of editing to this article and it's currently rated as a stub. It definitely needs reassessing and as I've made a large set of changes it would be more appropriate if somebody else assessed it. Thanks ●BillPP ^{(talk|contribs)} 00:32, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Done MortimerCat (talk) 23:37, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

• Kingston near Lewes has been assessed on the UK Geography Wikiproject, but not Wikiproject Sussex. Would it be a good candidate? Autarch (talk) 20:23, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Assessment log

Sussex-related articles:

The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.

This is a log of operations by a bot. The contents of this page are unlikely to need human editing. In particular, links should not be disambiguated as this is a historical record.

[edit] June 11, 2008

• Hellingly Hospital Railway reassessed from Unassessed-Class (Low-Class) to B-Class (Low-Class)
• Ralf Hogge (talk) Start-Class (Mid-Class) added.
• Crawley Town F.C. reassessed from Start-Class (No-Class) to Start-Class (Low-Class)
• Heritage Mill, North Chailey reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Start-Class (Low-Class)
• Highdown New Mill, Angmering reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Start-Class (Low-Class)
• Hogg Hill Mill, Icklesham reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Start-Class (Low-Class)
• New Mill, Cross in Hand reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Start-Class (Low-Class)
• Nutbourne Windmill reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Start-Class (Low-Class)
• Nyetimber Mill, Pagham reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Start-Class (Low-Class)
• Sidley, East Sussex (talk) Start-Class (Low-Class) added.
• Walter's Mill, Mark Cross reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Start-Class (Low-Class)
• West Blatchington Windmill reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Start-Class (Low-Class)
• Windmill Hill Mill, Herstmonceux reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Start-Class (Low-Class)

[edit] June 8, 2008

• Eastbourne reassessed from GA-Class (High-Class) to GA-Class (Top-Class)
• East Wittering Windmill reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Start-Class (Low-Class)
• Ovenden's Mill, Polegate reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Start-Class (Low-Class)
• St Leonard's Mill, Winchelsea reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Start-Class (Low-Class)
• Stone Cross Windmill reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Start-Class (Low-Class)
• Crawley Town F.C. (talk) Start-Class (No-Class) added.
• Hellingly Hospital Railway (talk) Unassessed-Class (Low-Class) added.

[edit] June 4, 2008

• Halnaker Windmill reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Start-Class (Low-Class)
• Medmerry Mill, Selsey reassessed from Unassessed-Class (Low-Class) to Start-Class (Low-Class)
• Rock Mill, West Chiltington reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Start-Class (Low-Class)
• Waterhall Mill, Patcham reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Start-Class (Low-Class)

[edit] June 1, 2008

• Scouting in East Sussex (talk) Start-Class (Low-Class) renamed to East Sussex Scout County (The Scout Association)
• Clayton Windmills reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Start-Class (Low-Class)
• John Baker's Mill, Barnham reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Start-Class (Low-Class)
• Lewes F.C. reassessed from Start-Class (No-Class) to Start-Class (Low-Class)
• Medway watermills (middle tributaries) reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Start-Class (Low-Class)
• Medway watermills (upper tributaries) reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Start-Class (Low-Class)
• Shoreham Tollbridge reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Start-Class (Low-Class)
• Weald and Downland Open Air Museum reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Start-Class (Low-Class)
• Barlavington reassessed from Stub-Class (No-Class) to Stub-Class (Mid-Class)
• Icklesham reassessed from Stub-Class (No-Class) to Stub-Class (Mid-Class)
• Tarring Neville reassessed from Stub-Class (No-Class) to Stub-Class (Mid-Class)
• Bateman's (talk) Stub-Class (Low-Class) added.
• Medmerry Mill, Selsey reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Unassessed-Class (Low-Class)

[edit] May 28, 2008

• Newhaven, East Sussex (talk) Start-Class (Mid-Class) added.
• Newick (talk) Start-Class (Mid-Class) added.
• Peacehaven (talk) Start-Class (Mid-Class) added.
• Plumpton, East Sussex (talk) Start-Class (Mid-Class) added.
• Seaford, East Sussex (talk) Start-Class (Mid-Class) added.
• Wivelsfield (talk) Start-Class (Mid-Class) added.
• Argos Hill Mill, Mayfield reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Start-Class (Low-Class)
• Beacon Mill, Rottingdean reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Start-Class (Low-Class)
• Blackdown Mill, Punnetts Town reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Start-Class (Low-Class)
• Holywell, Eastbourne (talk) Start-Class (Low-Class) added.
• Ringmer (talk) Start-Class (Low-Class) added.
• Piddinghoe (talk) Stub-Class (Mid-Class) added.
• South Heighton (talk) Stub-Class (Mid-Class) added.
• St Ann Without (talk) Stub-Class (Mid-Class) added.
• St John Without (talk) Stub-Class (Mid-Class) added.
• Telscombe (talk) Stub-Class (Mid-Class) added.
• Folkington (talk) Stub-Class (Low-Class) added.
• Streat (talk) Stub-Class (Low-Class) added.
• Tarring Neville (talk) Stub-Class (No-Class) added.

[edit] May 25, 2008

• Ashdown Forest (talk) Start-Class (Mid-Class) added.
• Beckley, East Sussex reassessed from Stub-Class (Mid-Class) to Start-Class (Mid-Class)
• Falmer (talk) Start-Class (Mid-Class) added.
• Glynde and Beddingham (talk) Start-Class (Mid-Class) added.
• Mount Caburn (talk) Start-Class (Mid-Class) added.
• Alfriston Windmill reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Start-Class (Low-Class)
• Bulverhythe (talk) Start-Class (Low-Class) added.
• Camber Sands (talk) Start-Class (Low-Class) added.
• Drusillas Zoo Park (talk) Start-Class (Low-Class) added.
• Gibbet Mill, Rye reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Start-Class (Low-Class)
• Somerley Mill, Earnley reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Start-Class (Low-Class)
• Younsmere hundred (talk) Start-Class (Low-Class) added.
• East Chiltington (talk) Stub-Class (Mid-Class) added.

[edit] May 21, 2008

• Whatlington (talk) Start-Class (Mid-Class) added.
• Flimwell (talk) Start-Class (Low-Class) added.
• King's Mill, Shipley reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Start-Class (Low-Class)
• Nutley Windmill reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Start-Class (Low-Class)
• South Marsh Mill, Arundel reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Start-Class (Low-Class)
• Sussex coast reassessed from Stub-Class (Low-Class) to Start-Class (Low-Class)
• Lewes F.C. (talk) Start-Class (No-Class) added.
• Berthun of Sussex reassessed from Stub-Class (No-Class) to Stub-Class (High-Class)
• Mountfield, East Sussex (talk) Stub-Class (Mid-Class) added.
• Peasmarsh (talk) Stub-Class (Mid-Class) added.
• Salehurst and Robertsbridge (talk) Stub-Class (Mid-Class) added.
• Sedlescombe (talk) Stub-Class (Mid-Class) added.

[edit] May 18, 2008

• Anita Roddick reassessed from Start-Class (Low-Class) to B-Class (Low-Class)
• Rye, East Sussex reassessed from Start-Class (Low-Class) to Start-Class (High-Class)
• Crowhurst, East Sussex (talk) Start-Class (Mid-Class) added.
• Etchingham (talk) Start-Class (Mid-Class) added.
• Robertsbridge (talk) Start-Class (Low-Class) added.
• Rye Harbour (talk) Start-Class (Low-Class) added.
• Dallington, East Sussex (talk) Stub-Class (Mid-Class) added.
• East Guldeford (talk) Stub-Class (Mid-Class) added.
• Fairlight, East Sussex (talk) Stub-Class (Mid-Class) added.
• Hurst Green, East Sussex (talk) Stub-Class (Mid-Class) added.
• Iden, East Sussex (talk) Stub-Class (Mid-Class) added.
• Northiam (talk) Stub-Class (Mid-Class) added.
• Playden (talk) Stub-Class (Mid-Class) added.
• Rye Foreign (talk) Stub-Class (Mid-Class) added.
• Udimore (talk) Stub-Class (Mid-Class) added.
• Westfield, East Sussex (talk) Stub-Class (Mid-Class) added.
• Salehurst (talk) Stub-Class (Low-Class) added.
• Icklesham (talk) Stub-Class (No-Class) added.
• East Wittering Windmill (talk) Unassessed-Class (No-Class) added.
• Shoreham Tollbridge (talk) Unassessed-Class (No-Class) added.
• Walter's Mill, Mark Cross (talk) Unassessed-Class (No-Class) added.

[edit] May 14, 2008

• Wealden (talk) Start-Class (High-Class) added.
• Bodiam (talk) Start-Class (Mid-Class) added.
• Brightling (talk) Start-Class (Mid-Class) added.
• Furner's Green (talk) Start-Class (Low-Class) added.
• Groombridge (talk) Start-Class (Low-Class) added.
• Beckley, East Sussex (talk) Stub-Class (Mid-Class) added.
• Brede, East Sussex (talk) Stub-Class (Mid-Class) added.
• Camber, East Sussex (talk) Stub-Class (Mid-Class) added.
• Barlavington reassessed from Stub-Class (Low-Class) to Stub-Class (No-Class)
• Alfriston Windmill (talk) Unassessed-Class (No-Class) added.
• Beacon Mill, Rottingdean (talk) Unassessed-Class (No-Class) added.
• Blackdown Mill, Punnetts Town (talk) Unassessed-Class (No-Class) added.
• Gibbet Mill, Rye (talk) Unassessed-Class (No-Class) added.
• Highdown New Mill, Angmering (talk) Unassessed-Class (No-Class) added.
• Hogg Hill Mill, Icklesham (talk) Unassessed-Class (No-Class) added.
• John Baker's Mill, Barnham (talk) Unassessed-Class (No-Class) added.
• Medmerry Mill, Selsey (talk) Unassessed-Class (No-Class) added.
• Nutbourne Windmill (talk) Unassessed-Class (No-Class) added.
• Nyetimber Mill, Pagham (talk) Unassessed-Class (No-Class) added.
• Ovenden's Mill, Polegate (talk) Unassessed-Class (No-Class) added.
• Rock Mill, West Chiltington (talk) Unassessed-Class (No-Class) added.
• South Marsh Mill, Arundel (talk) Unassessed-Class (No-Class) added.
• St Leonard's Mill, Winchelsea (talk) Unassessed-Class (No-Class) added.
• Stone Cross Windmill (talk) Unassessed-Class (No-Class) added.
• Waterhall Mill, Patcham (talk) Unassessed-Class (No-Class) added.
• West Blatchington Windmill (talk) Unassessed-Class (No-Class) added.

[edit] May 11, 2008

• East Dean and Friston (talk) Start-Class (Mid-Class) added.
• Framfield reassessed from Stub-Class (Mid-Class) to Start-Class (Mid-Class)
• Frant (talk) Start-Class (Mid-Class) added.
• Hartfield (talk) Start-Class (Mid-Class) added.
• Hellingly (talk) Start-Class (Mid-Class) added.
• Herstmonceux (talk) Start-Class (Mid-Class) added.
• Hooe, East Sussex (talk) Start-Class (Mid-Class) added.
• Horam (talk) Start-Class (Mid-Class) added.
• Isfield (talk) Start-Class (Mid-Class) added.
• Kingston near Lewes (talk) Start-Class (Mid-Class) added.
• Long Man (talk) Start-Class (Mid-Class) added.
• Maresfield (talk) Start-Class (Mid-Class) added.
• Mayfield and Five Ashes (talk) Start-Class (Mid-Class) added.
• Pevensey (talk) Start-Class (Mid-Class) added.
• Rotherfield (talk) Start-Class (Mid-Class) added.
• Westham (talk) Start-Class (Mid-Class) added.
• Heathfield, East Sussex (talk) Start-Class (Low-Class) added.
• Hadlow Down (talk) Stub-Class (Mid-Class) added.
• Heathfield and Waldron (talk) Stub-Class (Mid-Class) added.
• Laughton, East Sussex (talk) Stub-Class (Mid-Class) added.
• Argos Hill Mill, Mayfield (talk) Unassessed-Class (No-Class) added.
• Heritage Mill, North Chailey (talk) Unassessed-Class (No-Class) added.
• King's Mill, Shipley (talk) Unassessed-Class (No-Class) added.
• New Mill, Cross in Hand (talk) Unassessed-Class (No-Class) added.
• Nutley Windmill (talk) Unassessed-Class (No-Class) added.
• Somerley Mill, Earnley (talk) Unassessed-Class (No-Class) added.
• Windmill Hill Mill, Herstmonceux (talk) Unassessed-Class (No-Class) added.

[edit] May 5, 2008

• Uckfield (talk) Start-Class (High-Class) added.
• Barcombe reassessed from Start-Class (No-Class) to Start-Class (Mid-Class)
• Chiddingly reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Start-Class (Mid-Class)
• Warbleton (talk) Start-Class (Mid-Class) added.
• Willingdon and Jevington (talk) Start-Class (Mid-Class) added.
• Withyham (talk) Start-Class (Low-Class) added.
• Little Horsted (talk) Stub-Class (Mid-Class) added.
• Selmeston (talk) Stub-Class (Mid-Class) added.
• Clayton Windmills (talk) Unassessed-Class (No-Class) added.
• Halnaker Windmill (talk) Unassessed-Class (No-Class) added.

[edit] May 4, 2008

• Crowborough (talk) Start-Class (High-Class) added.
• Ashburnham and Penhurst reassessed from Unassessed-Class (Mid-Class) to Start-Class (Mid-Class)
• Berwick, East Sussex (talk) Start-Class (Mid-Class) added.
• Buxted (talk) Start-Class (Mid-Class) added.
• Chalvington with Ripe (talk) Start-Class (Mid-Class) added.
• Cuckmere Valley (talk) Start-Class (Mid-Class) added.
• Danehill, East Sussex (talk) Start-Class (Mid-Class) added.
• East Hoathly with Halland (talk) Start-Class (Mid-Class) added.
• Firle (talk) Start-Class (Mid-Class) added.
• Fletching, East Sussex (talk) Start-Class (Mid-Class) added.
• Rodmell (talk) Start-Class (Mid-Class) added.
• Southease (talk) Start-Class (Mid-Class) added.
• High Salvington windmill reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Start-Class (Low-Class)
• Tide Mills, East Sussex (talk) Start-Class (Low-Class) added.
• Barcombe (talk) Start-Class (No-Class) added.
• Horsted Keynes railway station reassessed from Stub-Class (Low-Class) to Stub-Class (High-Class)
• Kingscote railway station reassessed from Stub-Class (Low-Class) to Stub-Class (High-Class)
• Sheffield Park railway station reassessed from Stub-Class (Low-Class) to Stub-Class (High-Class)
• Catsfield (talk) Stub-Class (Mid-Class) added.
• Ewhurst, East Sussex (talk) Stub-Class (Mid-Class) added.
• Hamsey (talk) Stub-Class (Mid-Class) added.
• Iford, East Sussex (talk) Stub-Class (Mid-Class) added.
• Ninfield (talk) Stub-Class (Mid-Class) added.
• Berthun of Sussex (talk) Stub-Class (No-Class) added.
• Chiddingly (talk) Unassessed-Class (No-Class) added.
• Weald and Downland Open Air Museum (talk) Unassessed-Class (No-Class) added.

[edit] April 26, 2008

• Hastings/Archive 1 (talk) Start-Class (High-Class) removed.
• International Dance Teachers Association (talk) Start-Class (Low-Class) removed.
• Bluebell Railway reassessed from B-Class (Low-Class) to B-Class (High-Class)
• Arlington, East Sussex (talk) Start-Class (Mid-Class) added.
• Ditchling (talk) Start-Class (Mid-Class) added.
• Alciston reassessed from Stub-Class (Low-Class) to Start-Class (Low-Class)
• Burwash, East Sussex (talk) Stub-Class (Mid-Class) added.
• Chailey (talk) Stub-Class (Mid-Class) added.
• Pett (talk) Stub-Class (Mid-Class) added.
• Earl of Sussex (talk) List-Class (Top-Class) added.
• List of places in East Sussex (talk) List-Class (Top-Class) added.
• List of places in West Sussex (talk) List-Class (Top-Class) added.
• Lord Lieutenant of East Sussex (talk) List-Class (Top-Class) added.
• Lord Lieutenant of Sussex (talk) List-Class (Top-Class) added.
• Lord Lieutenant of West Sussex (talk) List-Class (Top-Class) added.
• Custos Rotulorum of Sussex (talk) List-Class (Low-Class) added.
• Ashburnham and Penhurst (talk) Unassessed-Class (Mid-Class) added.
• High Salvington windmill (talk) Unassessed-Class (No-Class) added.
• Medway watermills (middle tributaries) (talk) Unassessed-Class (No-Class) added.
• Medway watermills (upper tributaries) (talk) Unassessed-Class (No-Class) added.

[edit] April 22, 2008

• IDTA (talk) Start-Class (Low-Class) renamed to International Dance Teachers Association
• Sussex reassessed from B-Class (Top-Class) to Start-Class (Top-Class)
• Hastings/Archive 1 (talk) Start-Class (High-Class) added.
• Polegate (talk) Start-Class (High-Class) added.
• Alfriston (talk) Stub-Class (Mid-Class) added.
• Framfield (talk) Stub-Class (Mid-Class) added.
• Alciston (talk) Stub-Class (Low-Class) added.

[edit] April 15, 2008

• Brighton railway works (talk) B-Class (Low-Class) removed.
• International Dance Teachers Association (talk) Start-Class (Low-Class) renamed to IDTA
• A21 road (talk) B-Class (High-Class) added.
• A27 road reassessed from Start-Class (Mid-Class) to Start-Class (Top-Class)
• Sussex County Cricket Club reassessed from Start-Class (No-Class) to Start-Class (Top-Class)
• A23 road reassessed from Start-Class (Mid-Class) to Start-Class (High-Class)
• Chichester reassessed from B-Class (Top-Class) to Start-Class (High-Class)
• A22 road (talk) Start-Class (Mid-Class) added.
• Hastings railway station reassessed from Start-Class (Low-Class) to Start-Class (Mid-Class)
• Gareth Barry reassessed from Start-Class (No-Class) to Start-Class (Low-Class)
• MS Athina B reassessed from Start-Class (No-Class) to Start-Class (Low-Class)
• River Medway reassessed from Start-Class (No-Class) to Start-Class (Low-Class)
• Coates, West Sussex reassessed from Stub-Class (No-Class) to Stub-Class (Low-Class)
• Guestling (talk) Stub-Class (Low-Class) added.
• Mountfield Halt railway station reassessed from Stub-Class (No-Class) to Stub-Class (Low-Class)

[edit] April 13, 2008

• Brighton (talk) B-Class (Top-Class) removed.
• Lord Lieutenant of East Sussex (talk) Stub-Class (Top-Class) removed.
• Lord Lieutenant of Sussex (talk) Unassessed-Class (No-Class) removed.
• Lord Lieutenant of West Sussex (talk) Unassessed-Class (No-Class) removed.
• Medway watermills reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to B-Class (Low-Class)
• Slindon Cricket Club reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to B-Class (Low-Class)
• River Bewl reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Start-Class (Low-Class)
• Silverhill, Hastings reassessed from Unassessed-Class (Low-Class) to Start-Class (Low-Class)
• High Sheriff of East Sussex (talk) Stub-Class (Top-Class) added.
• High Sheriff of Sussex (talk) Stub-Class (Top-Class) added.
• Lewes Castle reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Stub-Class (Mid-Class)
• Slindon reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Stub-Class (Mid-Class)
• Ouse Valley Railway reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Stub-Class (Low-Class)
• Earl of Sussex (talk) Unassessed-Class (Low-Class) removed.
• Custos Rotulorum of Sussex (talk) Unassessed-Class (No-Class) removed.
• List of places in East Sussex (talk) Unassessed-Class (No-Class) removed.
• List of places in West Sussex (talk) Unassessed-Class (No-Class) removed.
• Sharpthorne Tunnel (talk) Unassessed-Class (No-Class) removed.
• Soundwaves Festival (talk) Unassessed-Class (No-Class) removed.
• High Sheriff of West Sussex reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Start-Class (Top-Class)
• Forest Row reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Start-Class (Mid-Class)
• Herstmonceux Castle reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Start-Class (Mid-Class)
• Long Man of Wilmington reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Start-Class (Mid-Class)
• Wealden iron industry reassessed from Start-Class (Low-Class) to Start-Class (Mid-Class)
• Hampden Park, East Sussex (talk) Start-Class (Low-Class) added.
• Rye, East Sussex (talk) Start-Class (Low-Class) added.
• Gareth Barry (talk) Start-Class (No-Class) added.
• Lord Lieutenant of East Sussex reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Stub-Class (Top-Class)
• Chichester Castle reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Stub-Class (Low-Class)
• Knepp Castle reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Stub-Class (Low-Class)
• Silverhill, Hastings (talk) Unassessed-Class (Low-Class) added.

[edit] April 9, 2008

• Eastbourne (talk) GA-Class (High-Class) added.
• London Gatwick Airport (talk) B-Class (High-Class) added.
• Ashurst Wood reassessed from Stub-Class (Mid-Class) to B-Class (Mid-Class)
• Bexhill-on-Sea (talk) Start-Class (High-Class) added.
• Hailsham (talk) Start-Class (High-Class) added.
• Hastings (talk) Start-Class (High-Class) added.
• List of Sites of Special Scientific Interest in East Sussex (talk) Start-Class (High-Class) added.
• Fishbourne Roman Palace (talk) Start-Class (Mid-Class) added.
• Wadhurst (talk) Start-Class (Mid-Class) added.
• International Dance Teachers Association reassessed from Start-Class (No-Class) to Start-Class (Low-Class)
• Broomham reassessed from Stub-Class (No-Class) to Stub-Class (Low-Class)

[edit] April 6, 2008

• Devil's Dyke railway station (talk) Stub-Class (Low-Class) renamed to The Dyke railway station

[edit] April 2, 2008

• Rotherfield & Mark Cross railway station (talk) Stub-Class (Low-Class) renamed to Rotherfield and Mark Cross railway station

[edit] March 31, 2008

• East Grinstead railway station reassessed from Stub-Class (Low-Class) to Start-Class (Low-Class)

[edit] March 27, 2008

(No changes today)

[edit] March 22, 2008

(No changes today)

[edit] March 19, 2008

(No changes today)

[edit] March 16, 2008

(No changes today)

[edit] March 11, 2008

• Golf Club Halt railway station (talk) Stub-Class (Low-Class) renamed to Golf Club Halt railway station (Hove)
• Slindon (talk) Unassessed-Class (No-Class) added.
• Slindon Cricket Club (talk) Unassessed-Class (No-Class) added.

[edit] March 4, 2008

(No changes today)

[edit] February 27, 2008

(No changes today)

[edit] February 25, 2008

• Tilgate Park reassessed from Stub-Class (Mid-Class) to Start-Class (Mid-Class)

[edit] February 19, 2008

(No changes today)

[edit] February 14, 2008

(No changes today)

[edit] February 10, 2008

• Brighton/Worthing/Littlehampton reassessed from Stub-Class (Mid-Class) to Start-Class (Mid-Class)
• Medway watermills (talk) Unassessed-Class (No-Class) added.

[edit] February 6, 2008

(No changes today)