Wikipedia:WikiProject Star Wars/Collaboration of the month/Previous

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archive This page is an archive. Do not edit the contents of this page. Direct any additional comments to the current talk page.

Contents

Star Wars: Jedi Apprentice

Nominated [[ [23 Feb 2006] ]]; needs 2 votes by [[ [27 Feb 2006] ]] (minimum 3 votes per week)

Support:

  1. Jedi6 03:34, 23 February 2006 (UTC)--"These articles are basically a bunch of stubs that need serious work. (Also I made the ending date Monday since we aren't working on an article now and to keep it the same as the selected article voting at Portal:Star Wars/Vote"
  2. Tutmosis 03:39, 23 February 2006 (UTC) - "Support 100% since this is quite an essencial article of the Star Wars Expanded Universe."
  3. Deckiller 03:55, 23 February 2006 (UTC) — This includes the entire series, not just the main article. This includes books, characters, locations, and so on.
  4. Judgesurreal777 05:30, 23 February 2006 (UTC)']--I second that
  5. Griz 15:47, 23 February 2006 (UTC) - I agree.
  6. BinaryTed 22:06, 23 February 2006 (UTC) — Definitely needs a lot of work. I'm not familiar with any of the books so I can't contribute much in the way of content, but I'll be happy to help with style/copyediting in any way I can.
  7. PatCheng 01:20, 24 February 2006 (UTC) Support
  8. Pixelanteninja 03:22, 24 February 2006 (UTC) I support it, they do need alot of help.
  9. Smylere Snape 18:24, 24 February 2006 (UTC) I second everything BinaryTed said. :)
  10. Pkazz 18:56, 24 February 2006 (UTC) It is fine other than the Binary Ted section
  11. Mipadi 20:40, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
  12. thepangelinanpost 00:09, 25 February 2006 (EST) This article definately needs the help of the Wikipedia users.
  13. Dark jedi requiem 06:40, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

Comment: Remember that this does nomination includes ALL BOOKS, CHARACTERS, AND LOCATIONS. Deckiller 17:09, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

The New Jedi Order

Nominated [[ [2 Mar. 2006] ]]; needs 3 votes by [[ [9 Mar. 2006] ]] (minimum 3 votes per week)

Support:

  1. Jedi6 07:49, 2 March 2006 (UTC)--For how big of a series this is, too many of the book's pages are just stubs.
  2. Katanin 00:45, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
  3. Tutmosis 13:31, 4 March 2006 (UTC)--Why not, another essential EU
  4. Team6and7 01:17, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
  5. Deckiller 01:31, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
  6. Stilgar135 04:03, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

Yuuzhan Vong invasion

Nominated [[ [11 March 2006] ]]; needs 3 votes by [[ [18 March 2006] ]] (minimum 3 votes per week)

Support:

  1. Jedi6 -The article needs work also there is about 15 battles in the conflict according to Wookipedia but we only have 2 covered.
  2. Tutmosis 01:38, 12 March 2006 (UTC) --"needs work"
  3. Deckiller 02:28, 12 March 2006 (UTC) Moreover, we can use this collaboration to merge all the small battle articles into this main article.
  4. BinaryTed 16:56, 13 March 2006 (UTC) - Needs a total rewrite from the ground up, grammar is really bad and can use a lot of additional information. I'd use Mipadi's new Clone Wars article as a basis.

Heir to the Empire

Nominated 16 March ; needs 3 votes by 23 March (minimum 3 votes per week)

Support:

  1. Firestorm 03:38, 16 March 2006 (UTC) --this book is, in my opinion, one of the classics, yet the article hardly does it justice.
  2. BryanG 04:21, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
  3. Griz 16:15, 17 March 2006 (UTC) --This is a fantastic book, but the article does not do it credit.

The Jedi Academy trilogy

Nominated [[ [12 March 2006] ]]; needs 6 votes by [[ [29 March 2006] ]] (minimum 3 votes per week)

Support:

  1. Jedi6-(need help?) 02:32, 15 March 2006 (UTC)--This article really needs it, there is almost no information in it!
  2. Deckiller 02:34, 15 March 2006 (UTC) Excellent choice.
  3. Crna tec Gora 04:52, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

The Black Fleet Crisis

Nominated [[ [28 March 2006] ]]; needs 3 votes by [[ [3 April 2006] ]] (minimum 3 votes per week)

Support:

  1. ILovEPlankton 04:44, 28 March 2006 (UTC) This article also needs it very badly
  2. Mirlen 00:08, 29 March 2006 (UTC) - I would've gone with you Jedi6 because I agree that it needs to be standardized, but this article is badly in need of expansion.
  3. Jedi6-(need help?) 04:51, 3 April 2006 (UTC)