Wikipedia:WikiProject Semiprotect

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Some Wikipedians have formed a project to better organize information in articles related to projectname. This page and its subpages contain their suggestions; it is hoped that this project will help to focus the efforts of other Wikipedians. If you would like to help, please inquire on the talk page and see the to-do list there.

For more information on WikiProjects, please see Wikipedia:WikiProjects and Wikipedia:WikiProject best practices.

Contents

[edit] Title

WikiProject on Semiprotect status

[edit] Scope

Many RC patrol members spend a significant amount of time to revert misguided energy of vandals. Articles such as George W. Bush, Abortion, Creationism, etc.. are at a constant state of vandalist attack. Vandals would less likely to vandalise these articles as a set of restrictions (to be established) will inconviniance/prevent them from vandalising as easily. Articles such as George W. Bush can be quite unreliable at times. --Cool Cat My Talk 03:26, 27 July 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Participants

  • --Cool Cat My Talk 03:11, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
  • -- novacatz 04:23, 10 August 2005 (UTC) (relatively new to wikipedia, not sure what to do)

[edit] Structure

[edit] Estabslishing restrictions. Proposed restrictions

[edit] Edit count, logged in users only

The idea is that we require user to log in and have n many edits prior to editing a semi-protected page.

[edit] Pro
  • Vandals will need to make n number of edits. Fewer vandals will have the patience.
  • Vandals that vandalise political/contraversial pages due to their personal POV. (ie people vandalising George W. Bush just because they hate the guy)
  • Certain articles that exist to be vandalise will be reliable.
  • RC patrol will deal with lesser vandalim, or a slower rate of vandalism.

[edit] Con
  • Vandals may instead vandalise random pages.
  • May promote a minor level of elitisim although not intended.
  • An entier new policy. One new thing for admins to deal with.

[edit] Verification

Below is the email from wiki-pipermail

Hi! I've added to MediaWiki a feature which could be an alternative to page
protection: the verify feature. I've added to the sysops' bar a
'verify'/'unverify' button: 'verify' sets the current revision as
'verified'. When there is a 'verified' revision, users can still edit the
page, but new revisions are not shown until a sysops verifies it again (of
course, even new revisions can be accessed though the history, and the
verified one, if any, is in bold).
'Unverify', of course, removes the protection.
I think this would be a very good alternative to page protection against
vandals.
I would like to heard what do you think of it.
Regards,
Salvatore

[1]

[edit] Pro
  • Already implemented by devs according to the email, not avalible in the admin tool bar, yet.
  • Pages will be able to be edited by even the newest editor
  • Article will be reliable

[edit] Con
  • A new load to admins.

[edit] How should a pages semiprotected status be determined?

[edit] Admins will power, identical to how it works on {{portected}}

[edit] Pro
  • Pages are semi-protected swiftly on demand

[edit] Con
  • Just like {{protected}}, this function is open for abuse.

[edit] A voting system

SImilar to VfD users vote to semi protect pages

[edit] Pro
  • "Democratic"

[edit] Con
  • Likely to be cluttered like VfD
  • Yet a nother vote!

[edit] Goals

  1. Inconvenience/Discourage/Exterminate! vandals.
  2. Make articles such as George W. Bush, Abortion more reliable as these articles get vandalised multiple times a day.

[edit] Projects

[edit] Tasks

  1.  ?

[edit] General strategy and discussion forums

  • /General
  • /Strategy

[edit] Other subpages

[edit] Templates

[edit] Infoboxes


[edit] Other templates

Template:VotesforSemiprotect

[edit] Categories

  • Category:Semiprotected

[edit] Archives

  • #1