Wikipedia:WikiProject Radio/Peer review
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Instructions
[edit] Requesting a review
Consider running the article through an automated peer review first. This will catch common errors, saving you and the reviewer time.
- Add
peer-review=yes
to the {{WikiProject Radio}} project banner at the top of the article's talk page (see the project banner instructions for more details on the exact syntax). - From there, click on the "request has been made" link that appears in the template. This will open a page to discuss the review of your article.
- Place
=== [[Name of nominated article]] ===
at the top. - Below it, write what you hope to gain from a peer review (what are your goals? FA? GA? etc) and sign by using four tildes (
~~~~
). - Add
{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Radio/Peer review/Name of nominated article}}
at the top of the list of requests on this page. - Add a link to your article to the beginning of the Peer Review announcement list, which will automatically include it in the appropriate section of the Wikipedia:WikiProject Radio/to do.
[edit] Responding to a request
Everyone is encouraged to comment on any request listed here. To comment on an article, please add a new section (using ==== [[User:Your name|Your name]] ====
) for your comments, in order to keep multiple responses legible. You could also choose to just post bullets (*
) of suggestions and then post an indented bullet (**
) to comment about that suggestion.
[edit] Archiving
Reviews should be archived after they have been inactive for some time, or when the article is nominated as a featured article candidate or the articles "goals" have been met. To archive a review:
- Replace
peer-review=yes
withold-peer-review=yes
in the {{WikiProject Radio}} project banner template at the top of the article's talk page - Move
{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Radio/Peer review/Name of nominated article}}
from this page to the current archive page. - Remove article from Peer review announcement list
[edit] Requests
[edit] American Top 40
I am getting back in full WP mode, beginning with this article on a famous radio show that has now turned into a weekly habit for me. I am a fan of the weekend reruns on XM; who else on WP listens to it there? (I have DirecTV for that.)
I've gotten the most authorative book on AT40 (by Rob Durkee) for a while, via library loan. Only now am I realising how tough improvement will be accomplished this Christmas; hopefully it will be sped up upon the New Year.
Fellow Wikipedians from Coast to Coast, what's still there to do to make it a GA? I'll come back to continue editing next week, and read the suggestions. --Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 20:05, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
- A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style. If you would find such a review helpful, please click here. Thanks, APR t 02:39, 11 December 2007 (UTC)