Wikipedia:WikiProject Organizations/Taskforce-Notability

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted by Anthony Appleyard as obvious advertising. Non-admin closure. Alexius08 is welcome to talk about his contributions. 17:34, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Etoo

Etoo (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View AfD)

Violates WP:SPAM, reads like an advertisement, no sources. Renee (talk) 21:43, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:51, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

• This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 12:08, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

• Speedy Delete G11 or A7 Duffbeerforme (talk) 13:58, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
• Speedy delete G11. Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 15:44, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
• Delete non-notable, non-verifiable, and spam Jasynnash2 (talk) 16:14, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
• Tagged for speedy deletion as blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, or some other entity and requires a fundamental rewrite in order to become encyclopedic. Alexius08 is welcome to talk about his contributions. 16:34, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete requirement for non-trivial independant coverage not addressed by keeping side. Notability not therefore established. Spartaz ^Humbug! 20:59, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Picnicface Comedy

Picnicface Comedy (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View AfD)

Non-notable comedy group. One of their writers was listing in a magazine, and the group received trivial mention in an article bemoaning YouTube celebrities. Does not satisfy WP:N, in my opinion. ZimZalaBim ^talk 11:57, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Keep. One of them writes for This Hour has 22 Minutes, one of their Youtube videos has seven million views and was nominated for video of the year. They have also been acclaimed by Will Ferrell. -Oreo Priest ^talk 17:33, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

If you have sources for these claims, feel free to add them to the article. --ZimZalaBim ^talk 17:34, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Added sources to the page. Beijing goalie (talk) 16:22, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

• Delete this link farm. No significant coverage in reliable sources. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 22:54, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 19:24, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Renata (talk) 05:31, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

• Delete Sources don't seem to be that verifiable, the majority of the article seems to be a collection of links. --neonwhite user page talk 21:36, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
• Keep Useful information about certain internet memesTowel401 (talk) 22:29, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
• Keep The list of links could be trimmed, and I added a stub template because there isn't a whole lot of information, but other than those I think they are certainly notable enough. Reinderien 20:04, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.