Wikipedia:WikiProject Musical Theatre/Article Assessment/Archive

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] New Assessment Strategy

We have now been assessed by the Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team quality bot. Giving us a wonderful analysis page at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Musical Theatre articles by quality. The next task is to update all the tags on individual talk pages to match the ones on this page. Then, when the bot reassess at around 3:00 AM UTC our stats will be updated. I'm still trying to figure out what to do with these pages, but would love some help tagging with the new {{Musicals-project}} template. Just go to the template page for instructions. Ohh, and with this new system we get a nifty new article count box:

[edit] Statistics

Musical Theatre
articles
Importance
None Total
Quality
Featured article FA 2 2
Good article GA 8 8
B 136 136
Start 915 915
Stub 741 741
List 33 33
Assessed 1835 1835
Unassessed 2 2
Total 1837 1837

Updated daily at around 3:00 AM UTC.


[edit] Other Assessment Pages

[edit] Musical Theatre Article Assessment

The purpose of this project is to assess the status of articles relating to musical theater. Similar projects have been started with various other WikiProjects. Featured articles are listed on the Project Page and should be removed from the tables once they reach that status.

If you see an article on the list that you would like to edit, feel free to sign up. If there are several of them that you would eventually like to work on, sign up for them all. If you see an article for which someone else has signed up, monitor their edits to the page. If they don't seem to be actively working on the article (no edits in a month or so), feel free to leave them a message on their talk page.


Article Assessed Status Pending tasks Assessed by Edited by Watched by
Put a link to the article here assessment date in
DD Mon YY format
Use the color scheme codes below for background color, and give assessment, or leave white with "not yet assessed" Explain further why your rating is what it is, or highlight additional areas of concern Put your userid here, linkable Put your userid here, linkable, if you are engaged in editing the article Put your userid here, linkable, if you are watching this article

If you don't know how to add or assess an article at these lists, please post at the project talk page instead. Your collaboration will be added here shortly.

[edit] Codes and meanings

Article progress grading scheme [  v  d  e  ]
Label Criterion Reader's experience Editor's experience Example
Featured article FA
{{FA-Class}}
Reserved exclusively for articles that have received "Featured article" status, and meet the current criteria for featured articles. Definitive. Outstanding, thorough article; a great source for encyclopedic information. No further additions are necessary unless new published information has come to light, but further improvements to the text are often possible. Tourette Syndrome (as of July 2007)
Featured list FL
{{FL-Class}}
Reserved exclusively for articles that have received "Featured lists" status, and meet the current criteria for featured lists. Definitive. Outstanding, thorough list; a great source for encyclopedic information. No further additions are necessary unless new published information has come to light, but further improvements to the text are often possible. FBI Ten Most Wanted Fugitives (as of January 2008)
A
{{A-Class}}
Provides a well-written, reasonably clear and complete description of the topic, as described in How to write a great article. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, with a well-written introduction and an appropriate series of headings to break up the content. It should have sufficient external literature references, preferably from reliable, third-party published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy (peer-reviewed where appropriate). Should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. At the stage where it could at least be considered for featured article status, corresponds to the "Wikipedia 1.0" standard. Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject matter would typically find nothing wanting. May miss a few relevant points. Minor edits and adjustments would improve the article, particularly if brought to bear by a subject-matter expert. In particular, issues of breadth, completeness, and balance may need work. Peer-review would be helpful at this stage. Durian (as of March 2007)
Good article GA
{{GA-Class}}
The article has passed through the Good article nomination process and been granted GA status, meeting the good article standards. This should be used for articles that still need some work to reach featured article standards, but that are otherwise acceptable. Good articles that may succeed in FAC should be considered A-Class articles, but having completed the Good article designation process is not a requirement for A-Class. Useful to nearly all readers. A good treatment of the subject. No obvious problems, gaps, or excessive information. Adequate for most purposes, but other encyclopedias could do a better job. Some editing will clearly be helpful, but not necessary for a good reader experience. If the article is not already fully wikified, now is the time. International Space Station (as of February 2007)
B
{{B-Class}}
Commonly the highest article grade that is assigned outside a more formal review process. Has several of the elements described in "start", usually a majority of the material needed for a comprehensive article. Nonetheless, it has some gaps or missing elements or references, needs editing for language usage or clarity, balance of content, or contains other policy problems such as copyright, Neutral Point Of View (NPOV) or No Original Research (NOR). With NPOV a well written B-class may correspond to the "Wikipedia 0.5" or "usable" standard. Articles that are close to GA status but don't meet the Good article criteria should be B- or Start-class articles. Useful to many, but not all, readers. A casual reader flipping through articles would feel that they generally understood the topic, but a serious student or researcher trying to use the material would have trouble doing so, or would risk error in derivative work. Considerable editing is still needed, including filling in some important gaps or correcting significant policy errors. Articles for which cleanup is needed will typically have this designation to start with. Jammu and Kashmir (as of October 2007) has a lot of helpful material but needs more prose content and references.
Start
{{Start-Class}}
The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas, and may lack a key element. For example an article on Africa might cover the geography well, but be weak on history and culture. Has at least one serious element of gathered materials, including any one of the following:
  • a particularly useful picture or graphic
  • multiple links that help explain or illustrate the topic
  • a subheading that fully treats an element of the topic
  • multiple subheadings that indicate material that could be added to complete the article
Useful to some, provides a moderate amount of information, but many readers will need to find additional sources of information. The article clearly needs to be expanded. Substantial/major editing is needed, most material for a complete article needs to be added. This article still needs to be completed, so an article cleanup tag is inappropriate at this stage. Real analysis (as of November 2006)
Stub
{{Stub-Class}}
The article is either a very short article or a rough collection of information that will need much work to bring it to A-Class level. It is usually very short, but can be of any length if the material is irrelevant or incomprehensible. Possibly useful to someone who has no idea what the term meant. May be useless to a reader only passingly familiar with the term. At best a brief, informed dictionary definition. Any editing or additional material can be helpful. Coffee table book (as of July 2005)


[edit] General Musical Theater articles

Article Assessed Status Pending tasks Assessed by Edited by Watched by
Musical theatre 30 Jun 06 B Good article, many lists, needs some sections MusicMaker    

[edit] Composers

Article Assessed Status Pending tasks Assessed by Edited by Watched by
Harry Akst 24 Jul 06 Stub More than I knew, but it's rather light. WesternActor    
Benny Andersson   Start A good start, but needs expansion Ssilvers    
Harold Arlen 24 Jul 06 B Strong, but would benefit from more biographical information, etc. WesternActor    
Edward Barnes   Unassessed        
Lionel Bart 24 Jul 06 Start Sketchy, but a good beginning. WesternActor    
George Bassman 24 Jul 06 B Quite good! WesternActor    
Irving Berlin 24 Jul 06 B Should be improved to GA Sandy    
Elmer Bernstein 24 Jul 06 B Nice, but could be tweaked/filled out some. WesternActor    
Leonard Bernstein 24 Jul 06 B Should be improved to GA SandyGeorgia    
Eubie Blake 24 Jul 06 B Maybe even A-class, but do we really know nothing else of his life? WesternActor    
Marc Blitzstein   Unassessed        
Jerry Bock   Unassessed        
John Walter Bratton   Unassessed        
Mel Brooks   Unassessed        
Jason Robert Brown   Unassessed        
Lew Brown   Unassessed        
Mark Charlap   Unassessed        
Petula Clark   B Should be improved to GA Sandy    
George M. Cohan   Unassessed        
Cy Coleman   Unassessed        
Noel Coward   Unassessed        
Robert E. Dolan   Unassessed        
Ervin Drake   Unassessed        
Vernon Duke   Unassessed        
Gus Edwards   Unassessed        
Sherman Edwards   Unassessed        
William Finn   Unassessed        
Stephen Flaherty   Unassessed        
Scott Frankel   Unassessed        
Rudolf Friml   Unassessed        
Noel Gay   Unassessed        
George Gershwin   Unassessed        
Micki Grant   Unassessed        
Adam Guettel   Unassessed        
Marvin Hamlisch   Unassessed        
Tony Hatch   Unassessed        
Jerry Herman   Unassessed        
Elton John   Unassessed        
John Kander   Unassessed        
Jerome Kern   Unassessed        
Edward Kleban   Unassessed        
Michael John LaChiusa   Unassessed        
Burton Lane   Unassessed        
Jonathan Larson   Unassessed        
Carolyn Leigh   Unassessed        
Mitch Leigh   Unassessed        
Sylvester Levay   Unassessed        
Andrew Lippa   Unassessed        
Andrew Lloyd Webber   Unassessed        
Frank Loesser   Unassessed        
Frederic Loewe   Unassessed        
Robert Lopez   Unassessed        
Brian Lowdermilk   Unassessed        
Galt MacDermot   Unassessed        
Marguerite Monnot   Unassessed        
Jeff Marx   Unassessed        
Simon May   Unassessed        
Alan Menken   Unassessed        
Jerome Moross   Unassessed        
Anthony Newley   Unassessed        
Ivor Novello   Unassessed        
Richard O'Brien   Unassessed        
Clifton Parker   Unassessed        
Robert Planquette   Unassessed        
Cole Porter   Unassessed        
Mike Read   Unassessed        
Mary Rodgers   Unassessed        
Richard Rodgers   Unassessed        
Sigmund Romberg   Unassessed        
Harold Jacob Rome   Unassessed        
Jerry Ross   Unassessed        
Dana P. Rowe   Unassessed        
Willy Russell   Unassessed        
Harvey Schmidt   Unassessed        
Arthur Schwartz   Unassessed        
Stephen Schwartz   Unassessed        
Claude-Michel Schönberg   Unassessed        
Al Sherman   Unassessed        
Lucy Simon   Unassessed        
Matthew Sklar   Unassessed        
Julian Slade   Unassessed        
Ted Snyder   Unassessed        
Stephen Sondheim   Unassessed        
Jim Steinman   Unassessed        
Charles Strouse   Unassessed        
Leslie Stuart   Unassessed        
Jule Styne   Unassessed        
Kay Swift   Unassessed        
Jeanine Tesori   Unassessed        
Harry Tierney   Unassessed        
Björn Ulvaeus   Unassessed        
James Van Heusen   Unassessed        
John Wallowitch   Unassessed        
Harry Warren   Unassessed        
Kurt Weill   Unassessed        
Richard A. Whiting   Unassessed        
Frank Wildhorn   Unassessed        
Meredith Willson   Unassessed        
Sandy Wilson   Unassessed        
David Yazbek   Unassessed        
Vincent Youmans   Unassessed        

[edit] Lyricists

Article Assessed Status Pending tasks Assessed by Edited by Watched by
Lynn Ahrens   Unassessed        

[edit] Writers

Article Assessed Status Pending tasks Assessed by Edited by Watched by
Abe Burrows   Unassessed        

[edit] Actors

Article Assessed Status Pending tasks Assessed by Edited by Watched by
Matthew Broderick   Unassessed        
Bernadette Peters   B Not far from GA quality User:Ssilvers    

[edit] Other Personnel

Article Assessed Status Pending tasks Assessed by Edited by Watched by
Cy Feuer   Unassessed