Wikipedia:WikiProject Montenegro/Project banner

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Project banner

The {{WikiProject Montenegro}} project banner template should be added (not subst:ed) to the talk page of every article within the scope of the project. While the template does not require any additional parameters, it has a number of optional ones that add various extra features to the banner. The full syntax is as follows:

{{WikiProject Montenegro
|small=
|class=  
|importance=
|attention=
|peer-review= 
|old-peer-review=
}}

Template display formatting parameters:

  • small - show the normal or reduced size template; shows the reduced size template if small=yes.

General parameters:

  • class – a rating of the article's quality; see the assessment department for more details.
    • FA - The article has reached Featured article status.
    • A - Could be submitted as a Featured article candidate; probably could use some small updates to make it Featured quality.
    • GA - The article has reached Good article status.
    • B - Could be submitted as a Good article nominee; probably could use some updates or may lack some features from the Good article criteria, but it presents a good overview of the subject.
    • Start - The article is more than a stub, but may lack some important aspects of the topic's discussion.
    • Stub - The article is a stub; it likely contains one of the Montenegro stub templates.
    • Disambig or Dab - The article is a disambiguation page.
    • Template - The page is a template.
    • Category or Cat - The page is a category.
    • Image or img - The page is an image/map.
    • NA - The page is not an article or does not belong to the above classes.
  • importance – a rating of the article's importance; see the assessment department for more details.
    • Top
    • High
    • Mid
    • Low
    • NA - for non article pages, like image, category, dab and template
  • attention - yes if the article needs attention.
  • peer-review – yes if the article is currently listed on the project's peer review department.
  • old-peer-review - yes if the article had a peer review.

To avoid needlessly cluttering up talk pages, it is usually appropriate to remove any unused parameters from the template.