Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Shortcut:
WP:MHA

The assessment department of the Military history WikiProject focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's military history articles. The resulting article ratings are used within the project to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work, and are also expected to play a role in the WP:1.0 program.

The assessment is done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WPMILHIST}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Military history articles by quality, which serve as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.

Contents

[edit] FAQ

Shortcut:
WP:MHA#FAQ
See also the general assessment FAQ and the project's B-Class assessment & criteria FAQ.
1. What is the purpose of the article ratings? 
The rating system allows the project to monitor the quality of articles in our subject areas, and to prioritize work on these articles. It is also utilized by the Wikipedia 1.0 program to prepare for static releases of Wikipedia content. Please note, however, that these ratings are primarily intended for the internal use of the project, and do not necessarily imply any official standing within Wikipedia as a whole.
2. How do I add an article to the WikiProject? 
Just add {{WPMILHIST}} to the talk page; there's no need to do anything else.
3. Someone put a {{WPMILHIST}} template on an article, but it doesn't seem to be within the project's scope. What should I do? 
Because of the large number of articles we deal with, we occasionally make mistakes and add tags to articles that shouldn't have them. If you notice one, feel free to remove the tag, and optionally leave a note on the talk page of this department (or directly with the person who tagged the article).
4. Who can assess articles? 
Any member of the Military history WikiProject is free to add—or change—the rating of an article. Editors who are not participants in this project are also welcome to assess articles, but should defer to consensus within the project in case of procedural disputes.
5. How do I rate an article? 
Check the quality scale and select the level that best matches the state of the article; then, follow the instructions below to add the rating to the project banner on the article's talk page. Please note that some of the available levels have an associated formal review process; this is documented in the assessment scale.
6. Can I request that someone else rate an article? 
Of course; to do so, please list it in the section for assessment requests below.
7. Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments? 
Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning.
8. Where can I get more comments about an article? 
The review department can conduct more thorough examination of articles; please submit it for peer review there.
9. What if I don't agree with a rating? 
You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again. Please note that some of the available levels have an associated formal review process; this is documented in the assessment scale.
10. Aren't the ratings subjective? 
Yes, they are somewhat subjective, but it's the best system we've been able to devise. If you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!
11. What about lists? 
Lists are assessed using the same scale as other articles; however, they progress towards featured list rather than featured article status.
12. What if I have a question not listed here? 
If your question concerns the article assessment process specifically, please refer to the discussion page for this department; for any other issues, you can go to the main project discussion page, or contact the project coordinators directly.

[edit] Assessment instructions

An article's assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{WPMILHIST}} project banner on its talk page (see the project banner instructions for more details on the exact syntax):

{{WPMILHIST| ... | class=??? | ...}}

The following values may be used:

Note that lists are assessed using the same scale as other articles; however, they progress towards featured list rather than featured article status.

Pages outside the main namespace (such as portals, images, categories, and user pages) are automatically assigned a class of "NA", indicating that they lie outside the assessment scheme.

Articles for which a valid class is not provided are listed in Category:Unassessed military history articles. The class should be assigned according to the quality scale below.

[edit] Quality scale

Class Criteria Formal process Example
Featured article FA Reserved for articles that meet the featured article criteria and have received featured article status after community review. Featured article candidates Victoria Cross (as of April 2008)
A Reserved for articles that have received A-Class status after review by the project. Such articles are expected to largely meet the featured article criteria, and must be comprehensive, accurate, well-sourced, and decently-written; however, they may require some further copyediting. A-Class review USS Siboney (ID-2999) (as of April 2008)
Good article GA Reserved for articles that meet the good article criteria and have received good article status. Good article nominations Siege of Damascus (as of April 2008)
B The article meets the following five criteria:
  1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points have appropriate inline citations.
  2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies.
  3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content.
  4. It is free from major grammatical errors.
  5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams.

See also the B-Class assessment & criteria FAQ.

May be assigned by any reviewer

A checklist is available through {{WPMILHIST}} to track the criteria (see the project banner instructions for more details)

Vicenzo Camporini (as of April 2008)
Start The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas, and may lack a key element; it has at least one serious element of gathered materials, including any one of the following:
  • A particularly useful picture or graphic
  • Multiple links that help explain or illustrate the topic
  • A subheading that fully treats an element of the topic
  • Multiple subheadings that indicate material that could be added to complete the article
May be assigned by any reviewer Thomas Müller (SS officer) (as of April 2008)
Stub The article is either a very short article or a rough collection of information that will need much work to bring it to A-Class level. It is usually very short, but can be of any length if the material is irrelevant or incomprehensible. May be assigned by any reviewer Bengal Regiment (as of April 2008)

[edit] Statistics

[edit] Current status

Military history
articles
Importance
None Total
Quality
Featured article FA 287 287
A 78 78
Good article GA 246 246
B 2403 2403
Start 34283 34283
Stub 30325 30325
Assessed 67622 67622
Unassessed 5 5
Total 67627 67627

[edit] Task force statistics

African military history task force assessment statistics
African military history
articles
Importance
None Total
Quality
Featured article FA 8 8
Good article GA 11 11
B 67 67
Start 468 468
Stub 458 458
Assessed 1012 1012
Total 1012 1012
worklistlogcategory
American Civil War task force assessment statistics
American Civil War
articles
Importance
None Total
Quality
Featured article FA 9 9
A 9 9
Good article GA 9 9
B 97 97
Start 1889 1889
Stub 1136 1136
Assessed 3149 3149
Total 3149 3149
worklistlogcategory
American Revolutionary War task force assessment statistics
American Revolutionary War
articles
Importance
None Total
Quality
Featured article FA 4 4
A 1 1
Good article GA 3 3
B 40 40
Start 651 651
Stub 484 484
Assessed 1183 1183
Total 1183 1183
worklistlogcategory
Australian military history task force assessment statistics
Australian military history
articles
Importance
None Total
Quality
Featured article FA 21 21
A 1 1
Good article GA 13 13
B 82 82
Start 835 835
Stub 887 887
Assessed 1839 1839
Total 1839 1839
worklistlogcategory
Balkan military history task force assessment statistics
Balkan military history
articles
Importance
None Total
Quality
Featured article FA 6 6
A 2 2
Good article GA 7 7
B 42 42
Start 309 309
Stub 183 183
Assessed 549 549
Total 549 549
worklistlogcategory
Baltic states military history task force assessment statistics
Baltic states military history
articles
Importance
None Total
Quality
Featured article FA 1 1
Good article GA 1 1
B 4 4
Start 81 81
Stub 35 35
Assessed 122 122
Total 122 122
worklistlogcategory
British military history task force assessment statistics
British military history
articles
Importance
None Total
Quality
Featured article FA 72 72
A 10 10
Good article GA 50 50
B 337 337
Start 4515 4515
Stub 5096 5096
Assessed 10080 10080
Total 10080 10080
worklistlogcategory
Canadian military history task force assessment statistics
Canadian military history
articles
Importance
None Total
Quality
Featured article FA 5 5
A 2 2
Good article GA 10 10
B 54 54
Start 625 625
Stub 646 646
Assessed 1342 1342
Total 1342 1342
worklistlogcategory
Chinese military history task force assessment statistics
Chinese military history
articles
Importance
None Total
Quality
Featured article FA 7 7
A 1 1
Good article GA 7 7
B 38 38
Start 523 523
Stub 397 397
Assessed 973 973
Total 973 973
worklistlogcategory
Classical warfare task force assessment statistics
Classical warfare
articles
Importance
None Total
Quality
Featured article FA 19 19
A 6 6
Good article GA 9 9
B 82 82
Start 537 537
Stub 491 491
Assessed 1144 1144
Total 1144 1144
worklistlogcategory
Crusades task force assessment statistics
Crusades
articles
Importance
None Total
Quality
Featured article FA 4 4
Good article GA 3 3
B 18 18
Start 138 138
Stub 63 63
Assessed 226 226
Total 226 226
worklistlogcategory
Dutch military history task force assessment statistics
Dutch military history
articles
Importance
None Total
Quality
Featured article FA 5 5
Good article GA 7 7
B 25 25
Start 236 236
Stub 143 143
Assessed 416 416
Total 416 416
worklistlogcategory
Early Modern warfare task force assessment statistics
Early Modern warfare
articles
Importance
None Total
Quality
Featured article FA 20 20
A 3 3
Good article GA 15 15
B 79 79
Start 1227 1227
Stub 869 869
Assessed 2213 2213
Total 2213 2213
worklistlogcategory
Early Muslim military history task force assessment statistics
Early Muslim military history
articles
Importance
None Total
Quality
Featured article FA 5 5
A 3 3
Good article GA 9 9
B 27 27
Start 91 91
Stub 39 39
Assessed 174 174
Total 174 174
worklistlogcategory
Fortifications task force assessment statistics
Fortifications
articles
Importance
None Total
Quality
Good article GA 11 11
B 20 20
Start 492 492
Stub 525 525
Assessed 1048 1048
Total 1048 1048
worklistlogcategory
French military history task force assessment statistics
French military history
articles
Importance
None Total
Quality
Featured article FA 27 27
A 6 6
Good article GA 16 16
B 122 122
Start 1453 1453
Stub 1270 1270
Assessed 2894 2894
Total 2894 2894
worklistlogcategory
German military history task force assessment statistics
German military history
articles
Importance
None Total
Quality
Featured article FA 27 27
A 7 7
Good article GA 10 10
B 147 147
Start 1709 1709
Stub 1340 1340
Assessed 3240 3240
Total 3240 3240
worklistlogcategory
Indian military history task force assessment statistics
Indian military history
articles
Importance
None Total
Quality
Featured article FA 3 3
Good article GA 3 3
B 50 50
Start 409 409
Stub 300 300
Assessed 765 765
Total 765 765
worklistlogcategory
Intelligence task force assessment statistics
Intelligence
articles
Importance
None Total
Quality
Featured article FA 1 1
Good article GA 1 1
B 13 13
Start 145 145
Stub 30 30
Assessed 190 190
Total 190 190
worklistlogcategory
Italian military history task force assessment statistics
Italian military history
articles
Importance
None Total
Quality
Featured article FA 8 8
B 49 49
Start 390 390
Stub 270 270
Assessed 717 717
Total 717 717
worklistlogcategory
Japanese military history task force assessment statistics
Japanese military history
articles
Importance
None Total
Quality
Featured article FA 25 25
Good article GA 6 6
B 85 85
Start 1426 1426
Stub 1089 1089
Assessed 2631 2631
Total 2631 2631
worklistlogcategory
Korean military history task force assessment statistics
Korean military history
articles
Importance
None Total
Quality
Featured article FA 1 1
B 17 17
Start 203 203
Stub 156 156
Assessed 377 377
Total 377 377
worklistlogcategory
Maritime warfare task force assessment statistics
Maritime warfare
articles
Importance
None Total
Quality
Featured article FA 54 54
A 5 5
Good article GA 25 25
B 377 377
Start 9123 9123
Stub 6789 6789
Assessed 16373 16373
Total 16373 16373
worklistlogcategory
Medieval warfare task force assessment statistics
Medieval warfare
articles
Importance
None Total
Quality
Featured article FA 34 34
A 7 7
Good article GA 30 30
B 97 97
Start 1111 1111
Stub 863 863
Assessed 2142 2142
Total 2142 2142
worklistlogcategory
Middle Eastern military history task force assessment statistics
Middle Eastern military history
articles
Importance
None Total
Quality
Featured article FA 7 7
A 1 1
Good article GA 3 3
B 73 73
Start 415 415
Stub 266 266
Assessed 765 765
Total 765 765
worklistlogcategory
Military aviation task force assessment statistics
Military aviation
articles
Importance
None Total
Quality
Featured article FA 18 18
A 18 18
Good article GA 19 19
B 468 468
Start 4131 4131
Stub 2361 2361
Assessed 7015 7015
Total 7015 7015
worklistlogcategory
Military biography task force assessment statistics
Biography (military)
articles
Importance
Top High Mid Low None Total
Quality
Featured article FA 4 8 2 36 50
A 1 3 4
Good article GA 3 5 10 7 34 59
B 11 43 81 87 538 760
Start 2 26 292 1162 5534 7016
Stub 2 5 83 612 6283 6985
Assessed 18 83 475 1870 12428 14874
Total 18 83 475 1870 12428 14874
worklistlogcategory
Military historiography task force assessment statistics
Military historiography
articles
Importance
None Total
Quality
Good article GA 3 3
B 14 14
Start 148 148
Stub 97 97
Assessed 262 262
Total 262 262
worklistlogcategory
Military memorials and cemeteries task force assessment statistics
Military memorials and cemeteries
articles
Importance
None Total
Quality
Featured article FA 7 7
Good article GA 3 3
B 18 18
Start 249 249
Stub 145 145
Assessed 422 422
Total 422 422
worklistlogcategory
Military science task force assessment statistics
Military science
articles
Importance
None Total
Quality
Featured article FA 2 2
Good article GA 1 1
B 22 22
Start 190 190
Stub 125 125
Assessed 340 340
Total 340 340
worklistlogcategory
Military technology and engineering task force assessment statistics
Military technology and engineering
articles
Importance
None Total
Quality
Featured article FA 23 23
A 12 12
Good article GA 18 18
B 217 217
Start 2530 2530
Stub 2050 2050
Assessed 4850 4850
Total 4850 4850
worklistlogcategory
Napoleonic era task force assessment statistics
Napoleonic era
articles
Importance
None Total
Quality
Featured article FA 12 12
A 1 1
Good article GA 8 8
B 43 43
Start 501 501
Stub 257 257
Assessed 822 822
Total 822 822
worklistlogcategory
National militaries task force assessment statistics
National militaries
articles
Importance
None Total
Quality
Featured article FA 7 7
Good article GA 1 1
B 37 37
Start 359 359
Stub 97 97
Assessed 501 501
Total 501 501
worklistlogcategory
New Zealand military history task force assessment statistics
New Zealand military history
articles
Importance
None Total
Quality
Featured article FA 2 2
Good article GA 1 1
B 21 21
Start 132 132
Stub 125 125
Assessed 281 281
Total 281 281
worklistlogcategory
Nordic military history task force assessment statistics
Nordic military history
articles
Importance
None Total
Quality
Featured article FA 10 10
Good article GA 3 3
B 29 29
Start 444 444
Stub 389 389
Assessed 875 875
Total 875 875
worklistlogcategory
Ottoman military history task force assessment statistics
Ottoman military history
articles
Importance
None Total
Quality
Featured article FA 3 3
A 2 2
Good article GA 2 2
B 27 27
Start 239 239
Stub 235 235
Assessed 508 508
Total 508 508
worklistlogcategory
Polish military history task force assessment statistics
Polish military history
articles
Importance
None Total
Quality
Featured article FA 16 16
A 3 3
Good article GA 5 5
B 30 30
Start 416 416
Stub 405 405
Assessed 875 875
Total 875 875
worklistlogcategory
Romanian military history task force assessment statistics
Romanian military history
articles
Importance
None Total
Quality
Featured article FA 1 1
A 4 4
Good article GA 6 6
B 10 10
Start 107 107
Stub 72 72
Assessed 200 200
Total 200 200
worklistlogcategory
Russian and Soviet military history task force assessment statistics
Russian and Soviet military history
articles
Importance
None Total
Quality
Featured article FA 18 18
A 10 10
Good article GA 8 8
B 83 83
Start 1199 1199
Stub 733 733
Assessed 2051 2051
Total 2051 2051
worklistlogcategory
South American military history task force assessment statistics
South American military history
articles
Importance
None Total
Quality
Featured article FA 1 1
Good article GA 1 1
B 21 21
Start 252 252
Stub 208 208
Assessed 483 483
Total 483 483
worklistlogcategory
Southeast Asian military history task force assessment statistics
Southeast Asian military history
articles
Importance
None Total
Quality
Featured article FA 12 12
A 19 19
B 48 48
Start 457 457
Stub 233 233
Assessed 769 769
Total 769 769
worklistlogcategory
Spanish military history task force assessment statistics
Spanish military history
articles
Importance
None Total
Quality
Featured article FA 10 10
A 1 1
Good article GA 3 3
B 10 10
Start 281 281
Stub 197 197
Assessed 502 502
Total 502 502
worklistlogcategory
Taiwanese military history task force assessment statistics
Taiwanese military history
articles
Importance
None Total
Quality
Good article GA 2 2
B 5 5
Start 51 51
Stub 30 30
Assessed 88 88
Total 88 88
worklistlogcategory
United States military history task force assessment statistics
United States military history
articles
Importance
None Total
Quality
Featured article FA 77 77
A 32 32
Good article GA 69 69
B 933 933
Start 13649 13649
Stub 7475 7475
Assessed 22235 22235
Total 22235 22235
worklistlogcategory
War films task force assessment statistics
War films
articles
Importance
Top High Mid Low None Total
Quality
Featured article FA 1 1 1 3
Good article GA 1 1 2
B 3 3 3 2 3 14
Start 4 10 14 17 107 152
Stub 1 3 76 181 261
Assessed 8 16 22 95 291 432
Total 8 16 22 95 291 432
worklistlogcategory
Weaponry task force assessment statistics
Weaponry
articles
Importance
None Total
Quality
Featured article FA 21 21
A 10 10
Good article GA 14 14
B 183 183
Start 2087 2087
Stub 1616 1616
Assessed 3931 3931
Total 3931 3931
worklistlogcategory
World War I task force assessment statistics
World War I
articles
Importance
None Total
Quality
Featured article FA 31 31
A 5 5
Good article GA 22 22
B 144 144
Start 2085 2085
Stub 1316 1316
Assessed 3603 3603
Total 3603 3603
worklistlogcategory
World War II task force assessment statistics
World War II
articles
Importance
None Total
Quality
Featured article FA 76 76
A 21 21
Good article GA 33 33
B 561 561
Start 8108 8108
Stub 4150 4150
Assessed 12949 12949
Total 12949 12949
worklistlogcategory

[edit] Requests for assessment

Shortcut:
WP:MHA#REQ
Please also check Category:Unassessed military history articles for articles needing assessment.

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below. Requests for formal A-Class review should be made at the review department. You could also consider entering articles you have worked on in the military history article writing contest.


Add new requests above this line

If you are interested in more extensive comments on an article, please list it for peer review instead.

[edit] Backlog of articles for assessment by class

The articles in Category:Unassessed military history articles need assessing by class. After assessment, they are automatically removed from this category.

[edit] Backlog of articles for tagging by task force

The articles in Category:Military history articles with no associated task force need tagging to allocate to task forces. After task forces have been assigned, they are automatically removed from the category.

[edit] Log

A full log of assessment changes for the past thirty days is available; unfortunately, due to its extreme size, it cannot be transcluded directly.

Languages