Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/HMAS Melbourne (R21)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
This article successfully passed the A-class review. Blnguyen (vote in the photo straw poll) 06:58, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] HMAS Melbourne (R21)

I've expanded this article and run it through Milhist Peer Review to get rid of most of the kinks. Although I do admit it could use a copyedit (which is on request at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Logistics, and anyway, what article couldn't use a copyedit?) is this article ready for A-class status, or is there anything else that needs fixing? -- saberwyn 06:51, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

  • Support. Excellent article. Cla68 (talk) 07:27, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Support. Good piece and, unusually, applies the MoS stuff about figures and numbers correctly :) Well done, --ROGER DAVIES talk 07:49, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
    • I've been smacked down by WP:MOSNUM so many times I thought it would be more painless to try and fix that stuff before anything else. -- saberwyn 09:40, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Support An outstanding article --Nick Dowling (talk) 09:29, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Support Really well done. One of the most comprehensive articles I've seen. Carom (talk) 01:05, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Support Outstanding article! Go ahead and nominate it for FA. --Eurocopter (talk) 17:28, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Absolutely Support This is 100% the exemplification of an A-class article. Good work. Everyone involved gets a pat on the back. --ExplorerCY 22:14, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Support. Just made a couple of minor copyedits but this is one of the best A-Class nominees I've seen - go for FA. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 14:48, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Support Outstanding work. Go for FA, you can do it! TomStar81 (Talk) 19:59, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.