The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Recently passed GA review, and also the main article for the cannon article series. --Grimhelm 09:21, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
Comment. Seems okay except that large portions of the text are uncited and there are a few one sentence paragraphs. If those can be fixed, I can support. CLA 02:00, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Comment. I agree with Cla I think it needs to be more thoroughly cited before I can support. Kyriakos 10:54, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Support the citation now appears adequate. However, I would consider removing the "See Also" section, and incorporating the links into the text. Carom 16:54, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.